We need to decentralize our military.

[ihopehefails]

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

 

[VaYank5150]

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

Oh yes, this is a great fucking idea. Because we ALL know just how much money the states already have in surplus to support their very own militaries. Not to mention an aircraft that costs $146M EACH! What a fucking moron.

 

[rightwinger]

We need to decentralize our military.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

Wow!

Absolutely the dumbest post of 2010. But considering it came from ihopehefails, I'm sure he can top it

 

[DiamondDave]

For once, I agree with ya VA.. this is on a Chris, Rightwinger, KMAN, or rdean level of lunacy

 

[TheSuaveOne]

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

Why do you hate the Constitution?

-TSO

 

[slackjawed]

Each state already has a national guard, which is organized and under the direct control of the governor of each state. The national guard is supported by supplies from the federal government, and the federal government can borrow national guard troops by making requests to the governor of the state.
The citizen's militias in each state(yes they are there) are funded and organized by private citizens. They are not under the direct control of the state government, but are loaned to them upon request.
The citizens militia here lends a hand when someone is lost, or our local sheriff needs help in some way.

 

[VaYank5150]

Each state already has a national guard, which is organized and under the direct control of the governor of each state. The national guard is supported by supplies from the federal government, and the federal government can borrow national guard troops by making requests to the governor of the state.
The citizen's militias in each state(yes they are there) are funded and organized by private citizens. They are not under the direct control of the state government, but are loaned to them upon request.
The citizens militia here lends a hand when someone is lost, or our local sheriff needs help in some way.

So, how many F-22s have you guys bought so far?

 

[slackjawed]

Each state already has a national guard, which is organized and under the direct control of the governor of each state. The national guard is supported by supplies from the federal government, and the federal government can borrow national guard troops by making requests to the governor of the state.
The citizen's militias in each state(yes they are there) are funded and organized by private citizens. They are not under the direct control of the state government, but are loaned to them upon request.
The citizens militia here lends a hand when someone is lost, or our local sheriff needs help in some way.

So, how many F-22s have you guys bought so far?

The local branch of the citizens militia here has two helicopters and two airplanes, with 2 more of each on the way this year. They have several military vehicles, and recently sent two to other militias in Missouri and in arkansas.

 

[ihopehefails]

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

Oh yes, this is a great fucking idea. Because we ALL know just how much money the states already have in surplus to support their very own militaries. Not to mention an aircraft that costs $146M EACH! What a fucking moron.

How much money does the federal government have. Are you aware it is in the same position that the state government are?

 

[Modbert]

I officially nominate the OP's post for stupidest post of 2010. I have a feeling it will be tough to top the OP.

 

[ihopehefails]

We need to decentralize our military.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

Wow!

Absolutely the dumbest post of 2010. But considering it came from ihopehefails, I'm sure he can top it

I'll just cut and paste your stuff to top it.

 

[TheSuaveOne]

Virginia ANG already has them.

-TSO

 

[ihopehefails]

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

Why do you hate the Constitution?

-TSO

The constititution does not forbid each state from getting its own military if it wanted to.

 

[TheSuaveOne]

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

Why do you hate the Constitution?

-TSO

The constititution does not forbid each state from getting its own military if it wanted to.

So how do you suppose they would interact with the active duty forces and reserve forces? Oh and who would fund the purchase of the equipment they would use? The people of the state? Will the people of the state also maintain the bases this military would be stationd at? Just curious where the states will find their funding.

-TSO

 

[slackjawed]

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

Why do you hate the Constitution?

-TSO

The constititution does not forbid each state from getting its own military if it wanted to.

from the constitution;
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

 

[VaYank5150]

Currently, our military is in the hands of one federal government but why can't each state develop their own military along with the federal government? This would ensure that when we have complete pussies in office, like we have now, that any state can build their own F-22s if they want to and any other military thing they want.

It might create a two prong method of defense. One is the federal government military and if that is killed off each state can then put up its own arms for defense.

Oh yes, this is a great fucking idea. Because we ALL know just how much money the states already have in surplus to support their very own militaries. Not to mention an aircraft that costs $146M EACH! What a fucking moron.

How much money does the federal government have. Are you aware it is in the same position that the state government are?

And this somehow makes your post less comical, how?

 

[ihopehefails]

Why do you hate the Constitution?

-TSO

The constititution does not forbid each state from getting its own military if it wanted to.

So how do you suppose they would interact with the active duty forces and reserve forces? Oh and who would fund the purchase of the equipment they would use? The people of the state? Will the people of the state also maintain the bases this military would be stationd at? Just curious where the states will find their funding.

-TSO

The state will buy them so they will fund it and they will maintain it for the same reason the federal government maintains their own military. Where does the federal government get funding for a military? They don't have any money either.

 

[VaYank5150]

The constititution does not forbid each state from getting its own military if it wanted to.

So how do you suppose they would interact with the active duty forces and reserve forces? Oh and who would fund the purchase of the equipment they would use? The people of the state? Will the people of the state also maintain the bases this military would be stationd at? Just curious where the states will find their funding.

-TSO

The state will buy them so they will fund it and they will maintain it for the same reason the federal government maintains their own military. Where does the federal government get funding for a military? They don't have any money either.

So.....you are suggesting the states raise taxes on their constituents to pay for all of this?

 

[ihopehefails]

Oh yes, this is a great fucking idea. Because we ALL know just how much money the states already have in surplus to support their very own militaries. Not to mention an aircraft that costs $146M EACH! What a fucking moron.

How much money does the federal government have. Are you aware it is in the same position that the state government are?

And this somehow makes your post less comical, how?

I don't think it is since that it is stated in the constitution that the federal government shall provide a navy. Who do you think was suppose to provide everything else?

 

[slackjawed]

Why do you hate the Constitution?

-TSO

The constititution does not forbid each state from getting its own military if it wanted to.

So how do you suppose they would interact with the active duty forces and reserve forces? Oh and who would fund the purchase of the equipment they would use? The people of the state? Will the people of the state also maintain the bases this military would be stationd at? Just curious where the states will find their funding.

-TSO

Depends, if your talking about the 'official' militia, that's the national guard. It gets its funding from both the state and the federal govt. If your talking about the citizens militias, most get their equipment from private sources. Our citizens militia is made up of mostly active and former military. Do you know what the 'oathkeeper patch is? Those guys, or the majority of them, wearing that patch in our military are also in their state's citizens militia.
Our state constitution defines militia members as "any armed citizen". The real organized part of it however, is made up of former and active military.