We know Lefties hate Russian interference, how about Big Tech / Social Media election interference..are you okay with that?

Indeependent

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
48,881
Reaction score
11,310
Points
2,030
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
Just like GW's Housing Bubble...
No evidence but it happened.
 

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,060
Points
1,590
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
That's again, an asinine interpretation. But what do you expect from a shill.

The irregularities have not been explained away despite the best of efforts. Why are the disqualified ballot rates so low? Why did they stop the count? Why were observers now allowed access? What where the 100K batches of ballots? On and on...
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
21,505
Reaction score
1,537
Points
190
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
Just like GW's Housing Bubble...
No evidence but it happened.
Plenty of evidence for the housing bubble. For election fraud, nothing concrete so far.
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
21,505
Reaction score
1,537
Points
190
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
That's again, an asinine interpretation. But what do you expect from a shill.

The irregularities have not been explained away despite the best of efforts. Why are the disqualified ballot rates so low? Why did they stop the count? Why were observers now allowed access? What where the 100K batches of ballots? On and on...
All speculation without any solid proof so far.
 

Indeependent

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
48,881
Reaction score
11,310
Points
2,030
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
Just like GW's Housing Bubble...
No evidence but it happened.
Plenty of evidence for the housing bubble. For election fraud, nothing concrete so far.
See Post #42.
SCOTUS will decide.
 

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,060
Points
1,590
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
That's again, an asinine interpretation. But what do you expect from a shill.

The irregularities have not been explained away despite the best of efforts. Why are the disqualified ballot rates so low? Why did they stop the count? Why were observers now allowed access? What where the 100K batches of ballots? On and on...
All speculation without any solid proof so far.
No, that's not speculation, that's evidence. It's enough evidence for me to determine the election was clearly stolen.

Facts are not speculation in any sense anyway.
 

WTH_Progs?

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
4,765
Reaction score
3,320
Points
940
I’m curious to know if election interference in general is what bothers them or if it’s and issue of who / what interferes and how said inference changes the end result.
They don't care about election interference - they had the most inclusive voter fraud organization as detailed by Biden.

They just hated Trump - and Americans.
Yep,they hate Trump and Americans so much that if voter fraud is what it took to keep trump out,they were all for that and they do eveything in the world to convince themselves fraud did not occur constantly lying ignoring whistle blowers same as they ignore whistle blowers in the fake Klung flu virus. It’s only the traiter biden fans that ignore the coronavirus hoax.
As for voter fraud, where's the beef? Nobody's shown any real proof of that yet.
 

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
42,120
Reaction score
9,367
Points
2,040
I’m curious to know if election interference in general is what bothers them or if it’s and issue of who / what interferes and how said inference changes the end result.
American citizens expressing opinions isn't "interference".

I mean seriously, can you really not understand the difference here?
 

Indeependent

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
48,881
Reaction score
11,310
Points
2,030
I’m curious to know if election interference in general is what bothers them or if it’s and issue of who / what interferes and how said inference changes the end result.
American citizens expressing opinions isn't "interference".

I mean seriously, can you really not understand the difference here?
Russia!
 

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
42,120
Reaction score
9,367
Points
2,040
Lol
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
That's again, an asinine interpretation. But what do you expect from a shill.

The irregularities have not been explained away despite the best of efforts. Why are the disqualified ballot rates so low? Why did they stop the count? Why were observers now allowed access? What where the 100K batches of ballots? On and on...
All speculation without any solid proof so far.
No, that's not speculation, that's evidence. It's enough evidence for me to determine the election was clearly stolen.

Facts are not speculation in any sense anyway.
He's correct, its just speculation.
 

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
42,120
Reaction score
9,367
Points
2,040
I’m curious to know if election interference in general is what bothers them or if it’s and issue of who / what interferes and how said inference changes the end result.
American citizens expressing opinions isn't "interference".

I mean seriously, can you really not understand the difference here?
Russia!
I already knew you were too stupid to understand the difference, no need to broadcast it.
 

BS Filter

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Messages
15,403
Reaction score
5,112
Points
360
The ends justify the means.

The goal is to destroy this government and replace it with a global collectivist state. The means of production belong to the workers of the world and they should not be exploited to benefit a few billionaires in NYC. All nations must be destroyed eventually to make the planet an egalitarian homogeneous place for humanity to properly flourish. It is a crime against humanity that billions of people struggle to live while manufacturing hideous clothing Americans wear once and throw away. It's a crime against humanity that we throw away more food than the rest of the world can produce, while children starve in the street. America must face it's comeuppance, so even if the ballot boxes have to be stuffed, so be it. Stalin had to do a few nasty things to make Russia a superpower in 30 years. If we have to do a few things to make the world a single power and eliminate war, genocide and hunger then there is no rule that shouldn't be broken to achieve that end.
Are you one of Bernie's kids?
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
21,505
Reaction score
1,537
Points
190
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
Just like GW's Housing Bubble...
No evidence but it happened.
Plenty of evidence for the housing bubble. For election fraud, nothing concrete so far.
See Post #42.
SCOTUS will decide.
Just cuz Trump stacked SCOTUS in his favour, doesn't mean that they'll support any nonsense whatsoever. So far, there's been NO solid evidence. And even you know that.
 

Taz

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
21,505
Reaction score
1,537
Points
190
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
That's again, an asinine interpretation. But what do you expect from a shill.

The irregularities have not been explained away despite the best of efforts. Why are the disqualified ballot rates so low? Why did they stop the count? Why were observers now allowed access? What where the 100K batches of ballots? On and on...
All speculation without any solid proof so far.
No, that's not speculation, that's evidence. It's enough evidence for me to determine the election was clearly stolen.

Facts are not speculation in any sense anyway.
You didn't present any facts. Just speculation.
 

Indeependent

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
48,881
Reaction score
11,310
Points
2,030
I’m curious to know if election interference in general is what bothers them or if it’s and issue of who / what interferes and how said inference changes the end result.
American citizens expressing opinions isn't "interference".

I mean seriously, can you really not understand the difference here?
Russia!
I already knew you were too stupid to understand the difference, no need to broadcast it.
4 years of Russia!
 
OP
BrokeLoser

BrokeLoser

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
23,832
Reaction score
7,867
Points
360
Location
MEXIFORNIA
I’m curious to know if election interference in general is what bothers them or if it’s and issue of who / what interferes and how said inference changes the end result.
American citizens expressing opinions isn't "interference".

I mean seriously, can you really not understand the difference here?
Yep, the folks writing the code, the algorithms for big tech and social media are all "Americans"....Because Crepitus said so.
 

Indeependent

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
48,881
Reaction score
11,310
Points
2,030
I’m curious to know if election interference in general is what bothers them or if it’s and issue of who / what interferes and how said inference changes the end result.
American citizens expressing opinions isn't "interference".

I mean seriously, can you really not understand the difference here?
Yep, the folks writing the code, the algorithms for big tech and social media are all "Americans"....Because Crepitus said so.
All the software I write receives message from users to change behavior.
 

Norman

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
31,256
Reaction score
15,060
Points
1,590
I love all the butthurt after 4 years of being obnoxious about everything. :woohoo:
Being pro-US is obnoxious?
No, Trump has been obnoxious about pretty much everything the last 4 years.
Successful is the word you look for.
Yes, some success, and I agreed with some of his policies, but he was just way too obnoxious as a person, otherwise he might have had a second term.
Everyone always knew who they were voting for and the current election results are still up in the air.
Trump lost, and he knows it. Claimed fraud again yesterday but with no proof, just fartsmoke.
The "victories" are statistically impossible.
Even in the Blueist areas in NYS, no one party gets over 95% of the vote; it just never happens.
Except no one has real proof of that.
The "victories" are impossible.
Except nobody has any real proof, just a lot of fartsmoke and butthurt.
Just like GW's Housing Bubble...
No evidence but it happened.
Plenty of evidence for the housing bubble. For election fraud, nothing concrete so far.
See Post #42.
SCOTUS will decide.
Just cuz Trump stacked SCOTUS in his favour, doesn't mean that they'll support any nonsense whatsoever. So far, there's been NO solid evidence. And even you know that.
You keep repeating that while plenty of evidence has been presented.

Just because you don't consider it evidence, as you won't consider anything evidence, doesn't mean it's not evidence.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
20,656
Reaction score
6,442
Points
265
I’m curious to know if election interference in general is what bothers them or if it’s and issue of who / what interferes and how said inference changes the end result.
American citizens expressing opinions isn't "interference".

I mean seriously, can you really not understand the difference here?
Yep, the folks writing the code, the algorithms for big tech and social media are all "Americans"....Because Crepitus said so.
Which social media company isn't an American company? Twitter, Facebook, Google, those are all American companies.
 
OP
BrokeLoser

BrokeLoser

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
23,832
Reaction score
7,867
Points
360
Location
MEXIFORNIA
I’m curious to know if election interference in general is what bothers them or if it’s and issue of who / what interferes and how said inference changes the end result.
American citizens expressing opinions isn't "interference".

I mean seriously, can you really not understand the difference here?
Yep, the folks writing the code, the algorithms for big tech and social media are all "Americans"....Because Crepitus said so.
Which social media company isn't an American company? Twitter, Facebook, Google, those are all American companies.
Easy there sheep.....They are companies primarily based in America with global employees, global shareholders, global users and global interests.
Don't dumb yourself down...that's what Leftarded fools do.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top