We Knew this was coming.

[Daktoria]

Marines, neoconservatism, feminism...

...same thing. Isn't that what neocons campaigned on when it came to the wars in the Middle East anyway - how radical Islamofascists treated their women?

If I only had a nickel every time people complained about feminists because they support women being allowed to abuse beta males...

...besides, the marines will probably enjoy having more women in their ranks anyway to help compensate for their lack of social assimilation into civilian society.

Aye yay yay......

You're a moron. There's no point bothering with a substantive response to your infantile babble.

Not really. You're just a neocon who doesn't understand what conservatism originally stood for: Neoconservatism and paleoconservatism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old Right (United States) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

 

[Kondor3]

Marines, neoconservatism, feminism...

...same thing. Isn't that what neocons campaigned on when it came to the wars in the Middle East anyway - how radical Islamofascists treated their women?

If I only had a nickel every time people complained about feminists because they support women being allowed to abuse beta males...

...besides, the marines will probably enjoy having more women in their ranks anyway to help compensate for their lack of social assimilation into civilian society.

Aye yay yay......

That was a crappy thing to say about the United States Marines...

Enjoy the Neg-Rep...

From a US Army veteran, watching the backs of other service-folk at the moment...

 

[bripat9643]

The military started to allow females and males to be trained jointly in basic training in 1982. You know it was really the feminist Nancy Reagan of which you reffer.

Exactly.

It's really amazing how often conservatives ignore how much feminism has infected their ideology.

Rugged individualism hooah! /facepalm

Yes, let's just ignore domestic violence against men and how the public education system tolerates girls bullying boys because boys are supposed to be tough and so many conservatives aren't willing to confront female, feminist, unionized teachers.

Let's just throw boys into the military instead after getting socially alienated by the destruction of family values, ruining of public education, and tolerance of mass media pop culture consumerism backed by the free market.

It's no wonder the right is viewed as being anti-intellectual.

Apparently you believe the above drivel is supposed to make some kind of sense. Aside from being totally moronic, what does any of that have to do with the question of whether females are physically able to perform in combat?

 

[Daktoria]

Marines, neoconservatism, feminism...

...same thing. Isn't that what neocons campaigned on when it came to the wars in the Middle East anyway - how radical Islamofascists treated their women?

If I only had a nickel every time people complained about feminists because they support women being allowed to abuse beta males...

...besides, the marines will probably enjoy having more women in their ranks anyway to help compensate for their lack of social assimilation into civilian society.

Aye yay yay......

That was a crappy thing to say about the United States Marines...

Enjoy the Neg-Rep...

From a US Army veteran, watching the backs of other service-folk at the moment...

Why is it crappy to say something about how people aren't socially assimilated into civilian society?

Are you saying we should deliberately alienate people, especially men, instead and drill them into rugged individualism rather than respecting who's on the inside that counts?

Pardon me, but I don't think we should be relying on the military to employ people and fight wars around the world just because we refuse to care about how our social fabric is tearing apart.

Instead, we should start caring.

 

[bripat9643]

Marines, neoconservatism, feminism...

...same thing. Isn't that what neocons campaigned on when it came to the wars in the Middle East anyway - how radical Islamofascists treated their women?

If I only had a nickel every time people complained about feminists because they support women being allowed to abuse beta males...

...besides, the marines will probably enjoy having more women in their ranks anyway to help compensate for their lack of social assimilation into civilian society.

Aye yay yay......

You're a moron. There's no point bothering with a substantive response to your infantile babble.

Not really. You're just a neocon who doesn't understand what conservatism originally stood for: Neoconservatism and paleoconservatism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old Right (United States) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

So conservatism used to stand for sending women into combat?

Like I said, you're a moron.

 

[Kondor3]

"...Why is it crappy to say..."

If you have to ask the question, you will not understand the answer...

 

[bripat9643]

Marines, neoconservatism, feminism...

...same thing. Isn't that what neocons campaigned on when it came to the wars in the Middle East anyway - how radical Islamofascists treated their women?

If I only had a nickel every time people complained about feminists because they support women being allowed to abuse beta males...

...besides, the marines will probably enjoy having more women in their ranks anyway to help compensate for their lack of social assimilation into civilian society.

Aye yay yay......

That was a crappy thing to say about the United States Marines...

Enjoy the Neg-Rep...

From a US Army veteran, watching the backs of other service-folk at the moment...

Why is it crappy to say something about how people aren't socially assimilated into civilian society?

Are you saying we should deliberately alienate people, especially men, instead and drill them into rugged individualism rather than respecting who's on the inside that counts?

Pardon me, but I don't think we should be relying on the military to employ people and fight wars around the world just because we refuse to care about how our social fabric is tearing apart.

Instead, we should start caring.

You obviously aren't socially assimilated into civilian society since you don't even realize you are insulting an entire group of people.

I only wish I could neg you again since you're one of the dumbest libturds I have encountered so far in this forum.

 

[bripat9643]

The military started to allow females and males to be trained jointly in basic training in 1982. You know it was really the feminist Nancy Reagan of which you reffer.

Training with males is one thing. Going into combat loaded down with 60 lbs of gear is another.

 

[Daktoria]

That was a crappy thing to say about the United States Marines...

Enjoy the Neg-Rep...

From a US Army veteran, watching the backs of other service-folk at the moment...

Why is it crappy to say something about how people aren't socially assimilated into civilian society?

Are you saying we should deliberately alienate people, especially men, instead and drill them into rugged individualism rather than respecting who's on the inside that counts?

Pardon me, but I don't think we should be relying on the military to employ people and fight wars around the world just because we refuse to care about how our social fabric is tearing apart.

Instead, we should start caring.

You obviously aren't socially assimilated into civilian society since you don't even realize your are insulting an entire group of people.

I only wish I could neg you again since you're one of the dumbest libturds I have encountered so far in this forum.

I only wish you knew what a liberal actually was.

The marines you stand up for are an example of neoconservatism which is actually liberalism in conservative clothing.

Why?

...because the Zionism which neoconservatism supports is the foundation of the Progressive Era's Social Gospel's Protestant Work Ethic, the exact premise that founds rugged individualism in the first place by the way...

...and it even goes further than that. Have you ever heard of the New York Intellectuals?

If you want to neg-rep someone for being a "libturd", then you can neg-rep yourself.

 

[Antares]

Marines, neoconservatism, feminism...

...same thing. Isn't that what neocons campaigned on when it came to the wars in the Middle East anyway - how radical Islamofascists treated their women?

If I only had a nickel every time people complained about feminists because they support women being allowed to abuse beta males...

...besides, the marines will probably enjoy having more women in their ranks anyway to help compensate for their lack of social assimilation into civilian society.

Aye yay yay......

We'll let you partner with one then.

Me?
If I need to be pulled out of a situation I don't want one with me.

 

[Daktoria]

...and why does that situation exist in the first place?

Did you ever consider that the very maintenance of defense provokes the need for defense to begin with?

For example, if we weren't intervening in the Middle East for decades upon generations, why would we have a problem with radical Islamists today?

 

[bripat9643]

Why is it crappy to say something about how people aren't socially assimilated into civilian society?

Are you saying we should deliberately alienate people, especially men, instead and drill them into rugged individualism rather than respecting who's on the inside that counts?

Pardon me, but I don't think we should be relying on the military to employ people and fight wars around the world just because we refuse to care about how our social fabric is tearing apart.

Instead, we should start caring.

You obviously aren't socially assimilated into civilian society since you don't even realize your are insulting an entire group of people.

I only wish I could neg you again since you're one of the dumbest libturds I have encountered so far in this forum.

I only wish you knew what a liberal actually was.

The marines you stand up for are an example of neoconservatism which is actually liberalism in conservative clothing.

Why?

...because the Zionism which neoconservatism supports is the foundation of the Progressive Era's Social Gospel's Protestant Work Ethic, the exact premise that founds rugged individualism in the first place by the way...

...and it even goes further than that. Have you ever heard of the New York Intellectuals?

If you want to neg-rep someone for being a "libturd", then you can neg-rep yourself.

The term "Zionism" is only used by anti-Semites. All your blather is totally absurd and meaningless. It has nothing to do with the topic of this thread. Conservatives of any stripe have never supported putting women into combat. That's purely a libturd position.

 

[bripat9643]

...and why does that situation exist in the first place?

Did you ever consider that the very maintenance of defense provokes the need for defense to begin with?

For example, if we weren't intervening in the Middle East for decades upon generations, why would we have a problem with radical Islamists today?

So the best defense is no defense?

You are setting new libturd standards for idiocy.

 

[kaz]

Watch the military lower the standards for women

Women are a victim of your sexist counting...

 

[Antares]

...and why does that situation exist in the first place?

Did you ever consider that the very maintenance of defense provokes the need for defense to begin with?

For example, if we weren't intervening in the Middle East for decades upon generations, why would we have a problem with radical Islamists today?

Sorry son , the situation exists because despite your utopian beliefs man is not a peaceful animal. He is selfish, violent and greedy. It was ever thus, pacifists and existenialists don't survive in the real world.

 

[deltex1]

...and why does that situation exist in the first place?

Did you ever consider that the very maintenance of defense provokes the need for defense to begin with?

For example, if we weren't intervening in the Middle East for decades upon generations, why would we have a problem with radical Islamists today?

I suppose that's why bullies always pick of the tough kids?? No...never thought of that.

 

[Daktoria]

...and why does that situation exist in the first place?

Did you ever consider that the very maintenance of defense provokes the need for defense to begin with?

For example, if we weren't intervening in the Middle East for decades upon generations, why would we have a problem with radical Islamists today?

So the best defense is no defense?

You are setting new libturd standards for idiocy.

The best defense is preventing the problem before it starts.

For example, don't intervene in foreign countries in the name of some people who are actually destroying our social fabric back home. Don't take their natural resources in order to empower the destruction of our social fabric back home.

Instead, deal with the destruction of social fabric back home instead of provoking others into trying to deal with it for us.

I mean the Wars in Iraq and on Terror are basically like having a neighbor who tries to intervene in your dysfunctional household where you're getting abused, only for you to go back over after he does so, and punching him in the face...

...and then on top of that, you talk about how that intervening neighbor contradicts your abusive housemate (see: how neocons criticize how radical Islamists treat their women despite having problems with feminists back home).

Do you understand how bona fide moronic that is?

 

[Kondor3]

"...don't intervene in foreign countries in the name of some people who are actually destroying our social fabric back home..."

Who is destroying our social fabric back home?

 

[bripat9643]

"...don't intervene in foreign countries in the name of some people who are actually destroying our social fabric back home..."

Who is destroying our social fabric back home?

He is, along with the rest of his ilk.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

...and why does that situation exist in the first place?

Did you ever consider that the very maintenance of defense provokes the need for defense to begin with?

For example, if we weren't intervening in the Middle East for decades upon generations, why would we have a problem with radical Islamists today?

So the best defense is no defense?

You are setting new libturd standards for idiocy.

The best defense is preventing the problem before it starts.

For example, don't intervene in foreign countries in the name of some people who are actually destroying our social fabric back home. Don't take their natural resources in order to empower the destruction of our social fabric back home.

Instead, deal with the destruction of social fabric back home ?

Define our 'Social Fabric'