Clairvoyance not required. Don’t be silly, Flops. We know the bullshit allegations. All 34 of them.
Do that and this would not be USMB, a Board that promotes free speech, no matter how stupid it might be.
If you want anyone to believe your claim that these are really bullshit allegations, then you need support your claim based on the facts of the case, otherwise, there is no need to waste time on replies.
Not buying it. Sorry.
He has not once said that. No need to lie. You can waste time and embarrass yourself fully truthfully.
Oh, I see. So the cause of your error is a poor grasp of basic logic.
Campaign contributions are not just money. A contribution is anything of value given, loaned or advanced to influence a federal election. The contribution does not need to be given to the campaign. If you buy a billboard that says elect Trump that is a contribution. If you pay someone hush money to stop the spread of rumors against Trump, that is a contribution. A single contribution limit from an individual in 2016 was $2700. So Cohen's contribution of over $300,000 in hush money is a violation of the law with a maximum penalty of 5yrs. Actually it's two violations. It exceeds the limit and he did not report the contribution. Any contribution over a a certain amount must be reported.
Snore boy says what?
If Trump wrote a personal check for the NDA, that would have been a campaign contribution? Yes A candidate can contributed unlimited amounts of money or things of value to his campaign to be elected. However the candidate is required to report the contribution. In the case of hush money payments, Trump would be required to report the amount as a contribution and also as a campaign expense. Obviously he did not want to publicize his hush money payments so he had Cohen do it and he paid him back after the election.
It's almost as if the grand juries, prosecutors, and judges understand the law. And those defending Turmp do not.
Yep, he could. Bragg has tried 31 cases with same charges as Trump. I wonder if they walked.
Probably so. State Criminal Judges and DA tend handle a bigger variety of criminal cases than most lawyers. In New York all felonies have to go through a Grand Jury before being tried. So prosecutors have to present the case twice. In the Grand Jury, jurors ask questions and this gives the prosecutor an insight into how well a jury will responds to his case. However, for a defendant like Trump that has unlimited resources to spend on lawyers, he can hire the best. However the DA is limited to prosecutors who are certainly not the best in the country.
They are bullshit claims, as I have already posted about numerous times. But you’re free to buy them as being the epitome of valid legal claims if that makes you feel better.
Just stomping your feet and repeating your claim doesn't cut it.
True dat. Which is why I haven’t stamped my feet. But repetition in light of the many reiterations of the false claim which I dispute is definitely required.
