We face a harsh new reality.

Trump ramping up the issue in Syria where we have no business being to start with is indeed an issue.
Ironic, you didn't have an issue when your favorite vegetable put them there. LOL, ISIS kills two American service members in Syria and somehow you equate it with Trump because he SAID the US will retaliate. WTF, did you think the US would do. You're an ignorant partisan moron. BTW, WTF would YOU do, turn a blind eye to the deaths of Americans like Biden did in Afghanistan?
 
The Taliban are a creation of the Islamic Fundamentalist faction within the Pakistan ISI;
...
The Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) (Urdu: انٹر سروسز انٹیلی جنس) is the military intelligence agency of Pakistan. It is responsible for gathering, processing, and analyzing information from around the world that is deemed relevant to Pakistan's national security. The main objective of the ISI is to integrate the Pakistan Armed Forces during wartime with real-time intelligence and support. The ISI reports to its agency executive and is primarily focused on providing intelligence to the Government of Pakistan and the Pakistan Armed Forces. It is part of the Pakistan Intelligence Community.
...
Relatively unknown outside of Pakistan since its inception, the agency gained global recognition and fame in the 1980s when it backed the Afghan mujahideen against the Soviet Union during the Soviet–Afghan War in the former Democratic Republic of Afghanistan. Over the course of the conflict, the ISI worked in close coordination with the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States and the Secret Intelligence Service of the United Kingdom to run Operation Cyclone, a program to train and fund the mujahideen in Afghanistan with support from China, Saudi Arabia, and other Muslim nations.

Following the dissolution of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan in 1992, the ISI provided strategic support and intelligence to the Taliban against the Northern Alliance during the Afghan Civil War in the 1990s.The ISI has strong links with jihadist groups, particularly in Afghanistan and Kashmir. Its special warfare unit is the Covert Action Division. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in their first ever open acknowledgement in 2011 in US Court, said that the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) sponsors and oversees the insurgency in Kashmir by arming separatist militant groups.
...

So basically, put bluntly, to get rid of the Taliban requires making war on Pakistan and clearing out about half of their ISI.

For a start.

Things get more messy and complicated if and/or when that first goal/objective is achieved.

War with the entire world........smart......
 
As recently as a decade ago, it would not have been hard to unite a broad majority of Republicans and Democrats around a shared idea of what America's military power should be for.

Defense of the homeland. Deterrence of would-be aggressors. Cooperation with treaty allies and protection of kindred democracies confronting common foes. Humanitarian aid and relief. The security of the global commons: sea lanes, air corridors, undersea cables, digital networks. Upholding the laws of war.

In sum, the ability to prevent war wherever possible and win it whenever necessary — all for the sake of a safer, more open, rules-based world.

The Trump administration brings a starkly different mind-set to the issue. Out with the Department of Defense; back to the Department of War. Well-established rules of engagement have yielded to blowing up small boats on the high seas. In place of standing with Ukraine’s embattled democracy against Russia’s invasion, the administration has adopted a course of moral equivalence between the two sides while seeking profits from the war through arms sales and mineral deals.


Before launching in to the usual personal attacks, dismissive deflections, whataboutisms, and disparagements of the source, I ask a question of those who disagree with the content of the editorial. What, IYO, did the authors get wrong?

I don't want to limit the scope of the discussion to the regime's activities in the Caribbean, but is this not true?

Well-established rules of engagement have yielded to blowing up small boats on the high seas.
So the harsh new reality is someone's opinion?
 
15th post
If I advocated for what you do, I wouldn't admit to being a democrat either. DON'T LOOK HERE--NOTHING TO SEE, LOOK OVER THERE. Moron.

You are advocating getting more American's killed. And for what?
 
The administration admitted it wasn't even being sent here.
The admin had never said all the narcoterrorist we’ve been able to take out weren’t coming here

They did acknowledge some was flowing to the larger market
 
You are advocating getting more American's killed. And for what?
Please link to that. You're LYING, AGAIN. You're favored democrats are the party responsible for EVERY American who is in danger in the world today. Take the blinders off, moron.
 
Back
Top Bottom