Watching CNN, former GOP Mia Love...thankfully she was voted out, she is dumb as a stump (or just dishonest)

[Faun]

.......,

LOL

Thanks for the tacit confession you lied again.

 

[Dragonlady]

She didn't use any "input or veto power" to put guards around the capitol.... come on DL now you aren't making any sense.... either she has control or she doesn't... she put the fence up and it didn't come down until she said it could... what do you call that?....
You are being shorted on the truth from where ever you get your news....

ONCE AGAIN, GIVING INPUT OR ADVICE ON OCCASION IN NO WAY MAKES PELOSI RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF THE CAPITOL.

The ONLY reason you are attempting to make this claim is to deflect from Donald Trump's responsibility for send a mob to the Capitol to violently attack the Line of Succession, preventing Biden's confirmation by the House and Senate, and thus giving Trump an excuse to declare Martial Law and cancel the Inauguration.

The failure by the Capitol Police, the DC Police, and the FBI to be properly prepared for the Insurrection in no way minimizes Donald Trump's responsibility for planning the assault, inciting the mob, and then ensuring that no help was sent to the Capitol for more than three hours after the Capitol was breached, to give them time to bring down the House and Senate.

Trump only called for the mob to go home when it became clear that no members of the House or Senate had been harmed and that the attack was a failure. Mike Pence called out the National Guard, and they were on their way to the Capitol. The Maryland National Guard had already arrived. Trump failed.

 

[Faun]

ONCE AGAIN, GIVING INPUT OR ADVICE ON OCCASION IN NO WAY MAKES PELOSI RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF THE CAPITOL.

The ONLY reason you are attempting to make this claim is to deflect from Donald Trump's responsibility for send a mob to the Capitol to violently attack the Line of Succession, preventing Biden's confirmation by the House and Senate, and thus giving Trump an excuse to declare Martial Law and cancel the Inauguration.

The failure by the Capitol Police, the DC Police, and the FBI to be properly prepared for the Insurrection in no way minimizes Donald Trump's responsibility for planning the assault, inciting the mob, and then ensuring that no help was sent to the Capitol for more than three hours after the Capitol was breached, to give them time to bring down the House and Senate.

Trump only called for the mob to go home when it became clear that no members of the House or Senate had been harmed and that the attack was a failure. Mike Pence called out the National Guard, and they were on their way to the Capitol. The Maryland National Guard had already arrived. Trump failed.

Rambtard already proved he was lying by being incapable of producing evidence he wasn't.

 

[Rambunctious]

ONCE AGAIN, GIVING INPUT OR ADVICE ON OCCASION IN NO WAY MAKES PELOSI RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF THE CAPITOL.

The ONLY reason you are attempting to make this claim is to deflect from Donald Trump's responsibility for send a mob to the Capitol to violently attack the Line of Succession, preventing Biden's confirmation by the House and Senate, and thus giving Trump an excuse to declare Martial Law and cancel the Inauguration.

The failure by the Capitol Police, the DC Police, and the FBI to be properly prepared for the Insurrection in no way minimizes Donald Trump's responsibility for planning the assault, inciting the mob, and then ensuring that no help was sent to the Capitol for more than three hours after the Capitol was breached, to give them time to bring down the House and Senate.

Trump only called for the mob to go home when it became clear that no members of the House or Senate had been harmed and that the attack was a failure. Mike Pence called out the National Guard, and they were on their way to the Capitol. The Maryland National Guard had already arrived. Trump failed.

She calls the shots... she said put up a fence and the fence went up... she said take it down and they took it down... if she has that power then she had that power on 1-6 too... you don't have to be a genius to figure that out DL......
The more you argue the dumber you sound.....

 

[Rambunctious]

LOL

Thanks for the tacit confession you lied again.

Pelosi said put up a fence and the fence went up... she said take it down and they took it down... if she has that power now then she had that power on 1-6 too... you don't have to be a genius to figure that out fauny......
The more you argue this issue the dumber you sound.....

 

[Faun]

She calls the shots... she said put up a fence and the fence went up... she said take it down and they took it down... if she has that power then she had that power on 1-6 too... you don't have to be a genius to figure that out DL......
The more you argue the dumber you sound.....

You're lying again. Need I remind you, you never posted any proof that Pelosi had that fence put up.

 

[Faun]

Pelosi said put up a fence and the fence went up... she said take it down and they took it down... if she has that power now then she had that power on 1-6 too... you don't have to be a genius to figure that out fauny......
The more you argue this issue the dumber you sound.....

LOL

I didn't ask you to repeat your lie and cite yourself as your source. I challenged you to prove your claim with a link.

As expected, you failed spectacularly.

 

[Rambunctious]

You're lying again. Need I remind you, you never posted any proof that Pelosi had that fence put up.

Where have you been?... under a rock... she talked about the fence at her daily pressers... she was asked when the fence will be taken down and she said when she says it can be.....

 

[Faun]

Where have you been?... under a rock... she talked about the fence at her daily pressers... she was asked when the fence will be taken down and she said when she says it can be.....

LOL

And here you are, still citing yourself instead of posting a link.

 

[Rambunctious]

LOL

And here you are, still citing yourself instead of posting a link.

The House sergeant-at-arms is the head of the capitol police and he or she reports to the House speaker... who happens to be Pelosi... for a few more months anyway.... if I cared about what you think I would take the time to find a link on the widely biased fake news web.... but I have a golf date.... so you are on your own dummy.....

 

[Faun]

The House sergeant-at-arms is the head of the capitol police and he or she reports to the House speaker... who happens to be Pelosi... for a few more months anyway.... if I cared about what you think I would take the time to find a link on the widely biased fake news web.... but I have a golf date.... so you are on your own dummy.....

LOL

You're truly a fucking rambtard.

No, imbecile, the House Sergeant-at-Arms is not the head of the Capitol Police. They're just one member of the Capitol Police Board. Nor does the Sergeant-at-Arms report to the House Speaker. They report to specific committees.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2/pdf/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2-3-3-3.pdf

The Committee on House Administration exercises oversight of the Office of the Sergeant–at–Arms and provides policy direction, pursuant to clause 4(d)(1)(A) of rule X.(41) Pursuant to clause 3(e) of rule II,(42) the Sergeant–at–Arms reports to the Committee on House Administration semi–annually on the ‘‘financial and operational status of each function under the jurisdiction of the Sergeant–at–Arms.’’ Clause 3(f) of rule II(43) requires the Sergeant–at–Arms to cooperate with any review or audit of financial or administrative operations.​

 

[Rambunctious]

LOL

You're truly a fucking rambtard.

No, imbecile, the House Sergeant-at-Arms is not the head of the Capitol Police. They're just one member of the Capitol Police Board. Nor does the Sergeant-at-Arms report to the House Speaker. They report to specific committees.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2/pdf/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2-3-3-3.pdf

​

The Committee on House Administration exercises oversight of the Office of the Sergeant–at–Arms and provides policy direction, pursuant to clause 4(d)(1)(A) of rule X.(41) Pursuant to clause 3(e) of rule II,(42) the Sergeant–at–Arms reports to the Committee on House Administration semi–annually on the ‘‘financial and operational status of each function under the jurisdiction of the Sergeant–at–Arms.’’ Clause 3(f) of rule II(43) requires the Sergeant–at–Arms to cooperate with any review or audit of financial or administrative operations.​

You are an idiot read your own link dumbass!!!!! the Sgt at arms is the head of the board and he answers to the speaker of the house.... what a fucking tard you are....

 

[Rambunctious]

LOL

You're truly a fucking rambtard.

No, imbecile, the House Sergeant-at-Arms is not the head of the Capitol Police. They're just one member of the Capitol Police Board. Nor does the Sergeant-at-Arms report to the House Speaker. They report to specific committees.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2/pdf/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2-3-3-3.pdf

​

The Committee on House Administration exercises oversight of the Office of the Sergeant–at–Arms and provides policy direction, pursuant to clause 4(d)(1)(A) of rule X.(41) Pursuant to clause 3(e) of rule II,(42) the Sergeant–at–Arms reports to the Committee on House Administration semi–annually on the ‘‘financial and operational status of each function under the jurisdiction of the Sergeant–at–Arms.’’ Clause 3(f) of rule II(43) requires the Sergeant–at–Arms to cooperate with any review or audit of financial or administrative operations.​

If you want to play word games you will have to play with yourself... which is what you are good at.... Pelosi rules that house inside and out and you know it.....
If she wanted the national guard there they would have been there....

 

[Faun]

You are an idiot read your own link dumbass!!!!! the Sgt at arms is the head of the board and he answers to the speaker of the house.... what a fucking tard you are....

LOL

You're brain-dead, rambtard. It doesn't say the Sergeant-at-Arms is the head of the board. It says he's a member of that board...

The Sergeant–at–Arms sits on the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the Capitol Police​

... and it doesn't say he reports to the House Speaker, it says the presiding officer, which can be the Speaker of any member of the House designated to preside over a session, can direct the Sergeant-at-Arms to maintain order in the House. According to your idiocy, that would mean the Sergeant-at-Arms reports to EVERY member of the House.

the Sergeant–at–Arms shall, ‘‘maintain order under the direction of the Speaker or other presiding officer.’’(17) The Speaker may direct the Sergeant–at–Arms to present the mace (the symbol of the authority of the Sergeant–at–Arms) to enforce order in the Chamber.(18)​

 

[Faun]

If you want to play word games you will have to play with yourself... which is what you are good at.... Pelosi rules that house inside and out and you know it.....
If she wanted the national guard there they would have been there....

She doesn't rule the Capitol, ya rambtard.

 

[Rambunctious]

LOL

You're brain-dead, rambtard. It doesn't say the Sergeant-at-Arms is the head of the board. It says he's a member of that board...

The Sergeant–at–Arms sits on the Capitol Police Board, which oversees the Capitol Police​

... and it doesn't say he reports to the House Speaker, it says the presiding officer, which can be the Speaker of any member of the House designated to preside over a session, can direct the Sergeant-at-Arms to maintain order in the House. According to your idiocy, that would mean the Sergeant-at-Arms reports to EVERY member of the House.

the Sergeant–at–Arms shall, ‘‘maintain order under the direction of the Speaker or other presiding officer.’’(17) The Speaker may direct the Sergeant–at–Arms to present the mace (the symbol of the authority of the Sergeant–at–Arms) to enforce order in the Chamber.(18)​

The board has a head and he is it.....
If Pelosi wanted the national guard there they would have been there.... you know it and everyone else knows it..... so your argument is moot.....

 

[Rambunctious]

She doesn't rule the Capitol, ya rambtard.

If Pelosi wanted the national guard there they would have been there....

 

[Faun]

The board has a head and he is it.....

False. The head alternates every year between the House Sergeant-at-Arms and the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms. THIS year, it's the House Sergeant-at-Arms. See if you can figure out who it was LAST year.

If Pelosi wanted the national guard there they would have been there.... you know it and everyone else knows it..... so your argument is moot.....

LOL

I like how you switched your argument from Pelosi rejected it ... to ... Pelosi could have had it if she wanted.

 

[Rambunctious]

False. The head alternates every year between the House Sergeant-at-Arms and the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms. THIS year, it's the House Sergeant-at-Arms. See if you can figure out who it was LAST year.





LOL

I like how you switched your argument from Pelosi rejected it ... to ... Pelosi could have had it if she wanted.

Whether its the HSA or the SSA they both answer to Pelosi dumbass....

 

[Rambunctious]

False. The head alternates every year between the House Sergeant-at-Arms and the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms. THIS year, it's the House Sergeant-at-Arms. See if you can figure out who it was LAST year.





LOL

I like how you switched your argument from Pelosi rejected it ... to ... Pelosi could have had it if she wanted.

Nothing happens in DC unless the queen signs off on it....
If pelosi wanted the Guard there they would have been there... she didn't want them there... why not dummy?... ask yourself why not?....