Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So the private company Crowdstrike got to look but the FBI and NSA were not allowed independent access in determining the investigation.
LOL
RW' accuse Comey of lying - how can you be sure he wasnt lying about the server ?
Pretty much been sorted out under investigation.........If you have proof he's lying then I suggest you send the proof to the DOJ so he can be prosecuted for Lying under oath ...........again....lol........so he can be properly charged.......
Ummm.......one question for you........do you guys love him now or hate him now.......hard to keep up with it.
So the private company Crowdstrike got to look but the FBI and NSA were not allowed independent access in determining the investigation.
LOL
So the private company Crowdstrike got to look but the FBI and NSA were not allowed independent access in determining the investigation.
LOL
RW' accuse Comey of lying - how can you be sure he wasnt lying about the server ?
Pretty much been sorted out under investigation.........If you have proof he's lying then I suggest you send the proof to the DOJ so he can be prosecuted for Lying under oath ...........again....lol........so he can be properly charged.......
Ummm.......one question for you........do you guys love him now or hate him now.......hard to keep up with it.
personally, I dont give 2 shits either way
one minute Comey is the biggest liar on the planet, the next minute his comments are trustworthy
another personally - I dont put a damn bit of stock in anything that comes from some RW partisan hack.
But you'd be OK with a Democrat org checking up on a Democrat computer server, to see what's going on ?another personally - I dont put a damn bit of stock in anything that comes from some RW partisan hack.
So the private company Crowdstrike got to look but the FBI and NSA were not allowed independent access in determining the investigation.
LOL
An "appropriate substitute" Uh huh. And all that appropriateness was with a Crowdstrike officer having been appointed to an Obama admin job (a little "collusion" anyone ?) (or might we say "corruption" quid pro quo ?) Strike 1.
A George Soros group. Uh huh. Strike 2
Crowdstrike funded by lefty Google. Uh huh. Strike 3.
Wagers open for how many more examples of Democrats investigating THEMSELVES. Maximum of 100, please.
Then used by the FBI for their investigation after Crowdstrike was paid to do it by the DNC.But you'd be OK with a Democrat org checking up on a Democrat computer server, to see what's going on ?another personally - I dont put a damn bit of stock in anything that comes from some RW partisan hack.
But you'd be OK with a Democrat org checking up on a Democrat computer server, to see what's going on ?another personally - I dont put a damn bit of stock in anything that comes from some RW partisan hack.
You mean the ones the DNC refused to allow the FBI to look at........F'n RW's couldnt cry any louder about a pointless server even if you shove one up their butt sideways.
yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
You mean the ones the DNC refused to allow the FBI to look at........F'n RW's couldnt cry any louder about a pointless server even if you shove one up their butt sideways.
yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Let me repeat that.........the DNC refused to allow the FBI to look at....
Let that sink in and get back with me.
That wasn't the question.how many servers does Trump have ?
Let this sink in.........Crowdstrike was paid for by the DNC........they have DNC ties.........and the DNC refused the FBI access to the Servers.....You mean the ones the DNC refused to allow the FBI to look at........F'n RW's couldnt cry any louder about a pointless server even if you shove one up their butt sideways.
yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Let me repeat that.........the DNC refused to allow the FBI to look at....
Let that sink in and get back with me.
no, the servers that WERE as pointless then as they are RIGHT FUCKING NOW !
soak that in MORON.
And your word >> "pointless" is based on ...............what ?no, the servers that WERE as pointless then as they are RIGHT FUCKING NOW !
soak that in MORON.
Like the FBI and NSA need a private company to do their work for them..........The FBI should have done the investigation not a private group......especially when it shows clear bias towards the DNC..........The long answer is that there is no "server"—there are many different servers and pieces of internet infrastructure in question, and the United States intelligence community and independent security researchers have examined much of it and have all reached the same conclusion: Russia hacked the DNC.
It is widely believed that CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC to respond to the hack, gave an identical image of some of the servers to the FBI, which experts I’ve spoken to say would be more useful than giving the FBI a physical server itself. I say “widely believed,” because we don’t know exactly what CrowdStrike gave to the FBI. However, in March 2017, former FBI Director James Comey told Congress that the FBI got an “appropriate substitute” from CrowdStrike, and Mueller’s indictment makes clear that the FBI has lots of information about the hack from both within the DNC and from other sources.
GFY - PLEASE.
Let this sink in.........Crowdstrike was paid for by the DNC........they have DNC ties.........and the DNC refused the FBI access to the Servers.....You mean the ones the DNC refused to allow the FBI to look at........F'n RW's couldnt cry any louder about a pointless server even if you shove one up their butt sideways.
yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Let me repeat that.........the DNC refused to allow the FBI to look at....
Let that sink in and get back with me.
no, the servers that WERE as pointless then as they are RIGHT FUCKING NOW !
soak that in MORON.
Soak that up and put it into a FRAME...........
An elaborate DODGE, but a DODGE nevertheless.The long answer is that there is no "server"—there are many different servers and pieces of internet infrastructure in question, and the United States intelligence community and independent security researchers have examined much of it and have all reached the same conclusion: Russia hacked the DNC.
It is widely believed that CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC to respond to the hack, gave an identical image of some of the servers to the FBI, which experts I’ve spoken to say would be more useful than giving the FBI a physical server itself. I say “widely believed,” because we don’t know exactly what CrowdStrike gave to the FBI. However, in March 2017, former FBI Director James Comey told Congress that the FBI got an “appropriate substitute” from CrowdStrike, and Mueller’s indictment makes clear that the FBI has lots of information about the hack from both within the DNC and from other sources.
GFY - PLEASE.
I haven't kept up much with the investigation which I've always considered just political flak perpetrated by anti-Trump folks. As for Rosenstein and Mueller it seems to me the Republicans have nobody to blame but themselves for this pair. So why does Dobbs lay this on Democrats while harping on two Republicans?
