Watch this... Hey libs, do you have any examples of successful socialist countries? List them.

[playtime]

don'tcha mean officially recognized definitions that all forms of higher education accepts as truth & fact?

no asswipe, you wouldn't know that for the very obvious reason i explained earlier.

i'll bet you think wikipedia is the go to source outside of your alternative factual based rw sites you frequent.

Accepting dictionary terms irregardless of what experts say is what morons like you do.

As for wikipedia, if the subject is political in any way, I assume the entry is a lie.

no, see official dictionaries do not do that. they print official definitions based on officially recognized terms from officially recognized sources..

but, you see.... i have seen you post opinions from the likes of breitbart & gateway pundit as if they were facts, so the very idea that you would know officially recognized anything is absurd.

What is this "official" source of definitions you're talking about it? What is the name of the dept of word definitions?

There is no "official" definition of any word, moron. Dictionaries decide on definition by looking at how words are used in widely published books, magazines, web sites and newspapers.

You pretend you know something about dictionaries, but you just proved you're an ignoramus and a blowhard.

webster's, oxford, etc do not define words based on the mere 'usage' of words. if they do duplicate what is written elsewhere it would be from BOOKS that ARE published from experts in the fields of origin. ie

legal terms, medical terms & the like. your idea of 'experts' are goons who hawk rag mags.

So who are these "official" sources of definitions for terms like "fake news," and "socialism?"

who are your experts that go by different definitions for socialism?

 

[bripat9643]

Accepting dictionary terms irregardless of what experts say is what morons like you do.

As for wikipedia, if the subject is political in any way, I assume the entry is a lie.

no, see official dictionaries do not do that. they print official definitions based on officially recognized terms from officially recognized sources..

but, you see.... i have seen you post opinions from the likes of breitbart & gateway pundit as if they were facts, so the very idea that you would know officially recognized anything is absurd.

What is this "official" source of definitions you're talking about it? What is the name of the dept of word definitions?

There is no "official" definition of any word, moron. Dictionaries decide on definition by looking at how words are used in widely published books, magazines, web sites and newspapers.

You pretend you know something about dictionaries, but you just proved you're an ignoramus and a blowhard.

webster's, oxford, etc do not define words based on the mere 'usage' of words. if they do duplicate what is written elsewhere it would be from BOOKS that ARE published from experts in the fields of origin. ie

legal terms, medical terms & the like. your idea of 'experts' are goons who hawk rag mags.

So who are these "official" sources of definitions for terms like "fake news," and "socialism?"

who are your experts that go by different definitions for socialism?

I no longer understand what the hell you're talking about. The point is that dictionaries are full of bullshit and crap. They aren't the final authority, much as you would like to believe.

 

[playtime]

no, see official dictionaries do not do that. they print official definitions based on officially recognized terms from officially recognized sources..

but, you see.... i have seen you post opinions from the likes of breitbart & gateway pundit as if they were facts, so the very idea that you would know officially recognized anything is absurd.

What is this "official" source of definitions you're talking about it? What is the name of the dept of word definitions?

There is no "official" definition of any word, moron. Dictionaries decide on definition by looking at how words are used in widely published books, magazines, web sites and newspapers.

You pretend you know something about dictionaries, but you just proved you're an ignoramus and a blowhard.

webster's, oxford, etc do not define words based on the mere 'usage' of words. if they do duplicate what is written elsewhere it would be from BOOKS that ARE published from experts in the fields of origin. ie

legal terms, medical terms & the like. your idea of 'experts' are goons who hawk rag mags.

So who are these "official" sources of definitions for terms like "fake news," and "socialism?"

who are your experts that go by different definitions for socialism?

I no longer understand what the hell you're talking about. The point is that dictionaries are full of bullshit and crap. They aren't the final authority, much as you would like to believe.

uh-huh. thing is, little dude.... if someone were to write a paper on socialism for a college level class & were to cite their sources.... the definition & the source i used would be accepted. that is the bottom line.

i see you produced no 'experts' that you claim have defined what socialism is.

 

[bripat9643]

What is this "official" source of definitions you're talking about it? What is the name of the dept of word definitions?

There is no "official" definition of any word, moron. Dictionaries decide on definition by looking at how words are used in widely published books, magazines, web sites and newspapers.

You pretend you know something about dictionaries, but you just proved you're an ignoramus and a blowhard.

webster's, oxford, etc do not define words based on the mere 'usage' of words. if they do duplicate what is written elsewhere it would be from BOOKS that ARE published from experts in the fields of origin. ie

legal terms, medical terms & the like. your idea of 'experts' are goons who hawk rag mags.

So who are these "official" sources of definitions for terms like "fake news," and "socialism?"

who are your experts that go by different definitions for socialism?

I no longer understand what the hell you're talking about. The point is that dictionaries are full of bullshit and crap. They aren't the final authority, much as you would like to believe.

uh-huh. thing is, little dude.... if someone were to write a paper on socialism for a college level class & were to cite their sources.... the definition & the source i used would be accepted. that is the bottom line.

i see you produced no 'experts' that you claim have defined what socialism is.

Of course it would be accepted, because pinko professors believe in socialism. They believe in bullshit and fairy tales.

 

[Rustic]

Dictionaries simply report how morons like you use a term. That doesn't make it rational or coherent.

don'tcha mean officially recognized definitions that all forms of higher education accepts as truth & fact?

no asswipe, you wouldn't know that for the very obvious reason i explained earlier.

i'll bet you think wikipedia is the go to source outside of your alternative factual based rw sites you frequent.

Accepting dictionary terms irregardless of what experts say is what morons like you do.

As for wikipedia, if the subject is political in any way, I assume the entry is a lie.

no, see official dictionaries do not do that. they print official definitions based on officially recognized terms from officially recognized sources..

but, you see.... i have seen you post opinions from the likes of breitbart & gateway pundit as if they were facts, so the very idea that you would know officially recognized anything is absurd.

Says someone who trusts the federal government... lol

says someone who is also poorly educated.

Says someone who lacks common sense

 

[regent]

webster's, oxford, etc do not define words based on the mere 'usage' of words. if they do duplicate what is written elsewhere it would be from BOOKS that ARE published from experts in the fields of origin. ie

legal terms, medical terms & the like. your idea of 'experts' are goons who hawk rag mags.

So who are these "official" sources of definitions for terms like "fake news," and "socialism?"

who are your experts that go by different definitions for socialism?

I no longer understand what the hell you're talking about. The point is that dictionaries are full of bullshit and crap. They aren't the final authority, much as you would like to believe.

uh-huh. thing is, little dude.... if someone were to write a paper on socialism for a college level class & were to cite their sources.... the definition & the source i used would be accepted. that is the bottom line.

i see you produced no 'experts' that you claim have defined what socialism is.

Of course it would be accepted, because pinko professors believe in socialism. They believe in bullshit and fairy tales.

College and University book stores have book on political ideologies, But of course if the writer is a college professor and most are...

 

[NYcarbineer]

This lame thread is still limping along? lol

Answer to the OP's question...all of Western Europe,

you know, those nations that for years have operated under what RW'ers have derisively described as 'European Socialism'.

Happy now?

 

[bripat9643]

This lame thread is still limping along? lol

Answer to the OP's question...all of Western Europe,

you know, those nations that for years have operated under what RW'ers have derisively described as 'European Socialism'.

Happy now?

You mean all those nations that are lilly white? Are you a racist?

 

[sealybobo]

Go ahead, we are interested in hearing these wonderful successes.

Please, list the countries.

Every country with national healthcare?

 

[sealybobo]

This lame thread is still limping along? lol

Answer to the OP's question...all of Western Europe,

you know, those nations that for years have operated under what RW'ers have derisively described as 'European Socialism'.

Happy now?

Or Canada and Australia too

 

[Theowl32]

No countries that are predominantly BROWN not on any list? Huh.....how could that be?

Say, why didn't the obamas rent a vacation villa in Port Au Prince?

Why did the great black Jesus go to the French Polynesia with Geffen on that $300 million yacht? Did they go to his homeland of Kenya? Noooooo?

Huh, why not?

Well, don't worry cause the very next week Geffen invited more Jews to be with them on that yacht.

The movie and music mogul, who seems to enjoy posting pics of famous friends on Instagram, has shared a string of images these past few months including a busy August when he welcomed (at the same time) Oprah Winfrey and BFF Gayle King, Disney chairman and CEO Bob Iger with wife Willow Bay, Barry Diller with wife Diane von Furstenberg, and Diane Sawyer. “Great week in Sicily,” Geffen wrote with a pic of Winfrey, King, Iger, Bay and Sawyer with newly-single Dasha Zhukova.


Let me know when one of these pieces of shit go to a shit hole, and being on a yacht or vacationing off the shore or staying in well secured luxurious hotels, also really does not count.

Boy, the left sure love going to those shit holes, don't they. They are so much better. They are just so great, arent they? How is that we get to even share the same air as these great people on the left? How could anyone in the peasant class ever think they could achieve anything? How dare someone in the serf class dare to dream.

 

[Theowl32]

This lame thread is still limping along? lol

Answer to the OP's question...all of Western Europe,

you know, those nations that for years have operated under what RW'ers have derisively described as 'European Socialism'.

Happy now?

Or Canada and Australia too

Two more reasons you are a racist.

The left still have no idea what my point is, and they keep making my point and they don't know it.

LOL!!!

 

[NYcarbineer]

No countries that are predominantly BROWN not on any list? Huh.....how could that be?

Say, why didn't the obamas rent a vacation villa in Port Au Prince?

Why did the great black Jesus go to the French Polynesia with Geffen on that $300 million yacht? Did they go to his homeland of Kenya? Noooooo?

Huh, why not?

Well, don't worry cause the very next week Geffen invited more Jews to be with them on that yacht.

The movie and music mogul, who seems to enjoy posting pics of famous friends on Instagram, has shared a string of images these past few months including a busy August when he welcomed (at the same time) Oprah Winfrey and BFF Gayle King, Disney chairman and CEO Bob Iger with wife Willow Bay, Barry Diller with wife Diane von Furstenberg, and Diane Sawyer. “Great week in Sicily,” Geffen wrote with a pic of Winfrey, King, Iger, Bay and Sawyer with newly-single Dasha Zhukova.


Let me know when one of these pieces of shit go to a shit hole, and being on a yacht or vacationing off the shore or staying in well secured luxurious hotels, also really does not count.

Boy, the left sure love going to those shit holes, don't they. They are so much better. They are just so great, arent they? How is that we get to even share the same air as these great people on the left? How could anyone in the peasant class ever think they could achieve anything? How dare someone in the serf class dare to dream.

We get it. You want Aryan superiority to be governmentally endorsed, supported, and promoted.

 

[danielpalos]

This lame thread is still limping along? lol

Answer to the OP's question...all of Western Europe,

you know, those nations that for years have operated under what RW'ers have derisively described as 'European Socialism'.

Happy now?

Or Canada and Australia too

Two more reasons you are a racist.

The left still have no idea what my point is, and they keep making my point and they don't know it.

LOL!!!

There are no true AnCaps. All first world nations have mixed-market economies.

 

[sealybobo]

This lame thread is still limping along? lol

Answer to the OP's question...all of Western Europe,

you know, those nations that for years have operated under what RW'ers have derisively described as 'European Socialism'.

Happy now?

Or Canada and Australia too

Two more reasons you are a racist.

The left still have no idea what my point is, and they keep making my point and they don't know it.

LOL!!!

What is your point?

 

[sealybobo]

Go ahead, we are interested in hearing these wonderful successes.

Please, list the countries.

Ok so I answered your question and you come back with: "The left still have no idea what my point is, and they keep making my point and they don't know it."

So what was your point? And how is answering Canada or Australia making your point? You wanted ANY example of a successful socialist country and since both of these countries have socialized medicine I picked them as two examples.

Wasn't the point you were trying to make that there are no successful socialist countries?

 

[dudmuck]

The fact remains, the Nazi party is/was socialist and they hate/hated capitalism and embraced socialism.
Confirmed...

I hear they also wore clothes and shit in toilets. What is your point?

The ONLY time Nazis hated capitalism was when Jewish people practiced it.
And Rustic has yet to back up that spectacularly dumb claim with ANY kind of evidence whatsoever.
I bet five bucks Rustic cannot offer ONE SINGLE concrete example of Hitler shutting down any capitalist endeavor whatsoever. In fact, Hitler loved capitalism SO MUCH that he gave an award to a very famous antisemite named Henry Ford.

Henry Ford receiving the Grand Cross of the German Eagle from Nazi officials, 1938

At a ceremony in Dearborn, Michigan, Henry Ford is presented with the Grand Cross of the Supreme Order of the German Eagle on his 75th birthday. Henry Ford was the first American recipient of this order, an honor created in 1937 by Adolf Hitler. This was the highest honor Nazi Germany could give to any foreigner and represented Adolf Hitler’s personal admiration and indebtedness to Henry Ford. The presentation was made by Karl Kapp, German consul in Cleveland, and Fritz Heller, German consular representative in Detroit.

Rustic, so far I've KICKED YOUR ASS TO HELL AND BACK with EVERY SINGLE reply I've given, and you have yet to disprove or overturn ONE SINGLE THING that I have said, not ONE, NONE, ZERO, ZILCH, ZIP, NADA.
You can yell, scream, flail about, post stupid internet memes, and contradict all you like but it doesn't change the fact that I have proven every single thing you have said is flat out WRONG, INCORRECT, ABSURD.

Why don't you just lay down and lick your nuts like the dumb dog that you are, and admit that you might just possibly be misinformed.
I know why...because secretly, you LOVE Hitler.
I bet you even have a giant swastika flag and posters of the guy in your Mom's basement where you live.

We're done here.

Lol
Angry much?
Capitalism is the enemy of every dictatorship, because capitalism improves the life of the individual not the collective. Dumbass

Oh yea, improving lives greatly.

 

[evenflow1969]

Go ahead, we are interested in hearing these wonderful successes.

Please, list the countries.

well had hitler not opened up a two front war we wouold have all been speaking german.

 

[jc456]

Go ahead, we are interested in hearing these wonderful successes.

Please, list the countries.

well had hitler not opened up a two front war we wouold have all been speaking german.

ahhh, but he did. and history is history.

 

[jc456]

The fact remains, the Nazi party is/was socialist and they hate/hated capitalism and embraced socialism.
Confirmed...

I hear they also wore clothes and shit in toilets. What is your point?

The ONLY time Nazis hated capitalism was when Jewish people practiced it.
And Rustic has yet to back up that spectacularly dumb claim with ANY kind of evidence whatsoever.
I bet five bucks Rustic cannot offer ONE SINGLE concrete example of Hitler shutting down any capitalist endeavor whatsoever. In fact, Hitler loved capitalism SO MUCH that he gave an award to a very famous antisemite named Henry Ford.

Henry Ford receiving the Grand Cross of the German Eagle from Nazi officials, 1938

At a ceremony in Dearborn, Michigan, Henry Ford is presented with the Grand Cross of the Supreme Order of the German Eagle on his 75th birthday. Henry Ford was the first American recipient of this order, an honor created in 1937 by Adolf Hitler. This was the highest honor Nazi Germany could give to any foreigner and represented Adolf Hitler’s personal admiration and indebtedness to Henry Ford. The presentation was made by Karl Kapp, German consul in Cleveland, and Fritz Heller, German consular representative in Detroit.

Rustic, so far I've KICKED YOUR ASS TO HELL AND BACK with EVERY SINGLE reply I've given, and you have yet to disprove or overturn ONE SINGLE THING that I have said, not ONE, NONE, ZERO, ZILCH, ZIP, NADA.
You can yell, scream, flail about, post stupid internet memes, and contradict all you like but it doesn't change the fact that I have proven every single thing you have said is flat out WRONG, INCORRECT, ABSURD.

Why don't you just lay down and lick your nuts like the dumb dog that you are, and admit that you might just possibly be misinformed.
I know why...because secretly, you LOVE Hitler.
I bet you even have a giant swastika flag and posters of the guy in your Mom's basement where you live.

We're done here.

Lol
Angry much?
Capitalism is the enemy of every dictatorship, because capitalism improves the life of the individual not the collective. Dumbass

Oh yea, improving lives greatly.

where's the danish guy's test?