Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 60,605
- 25,398
- 2,173
You defend the privileges of child sexual abusers to protect them.They are not. They are on record of protecting privileged communications.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You defend the privileges of child sexual abusers to protect them.They are not. They are on record of protecting privileged communications.
.Doctors are mandatory reporters, dope.
So you understand that we make exceptions to confidentiality laws to protect children..
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Actually said something right.
.

.This is one odd thread.![]()
oOO... He found one.Doctors are mandatory reporters, dope.
I'll take a win against child abuse any way it happens..
As OP, I wanted it mostly to be about the irony of a state that has given itself the legal right to sexually assault children, and wants you to believe it's preventing child abuse.
.
You do that for everything in life..
You just have to take your chances.
I chose a diocese and a church with a bishop and a priest I can trust. There are fewer leftist dimocrats in my pastorate -- a word they made up when the liberals and homos destroyed the abundance of priests, so now many priest have to manage many parishes, instead of just one.
And I will wait until judgment falls and hope it's soon.
.
.I'll take a win against child abuse any way it happens.
You decline them WHEN the are adjudicated as abusers.You defend the privileges of child sexual abusers to protect them.
LOL....Truth be told what happens on the left coast may as well happen on the surface of the moon for all I really care about it..
I'm afraid that the only win we have concerning the left coast is war.
.
.You decline them WHEN the are adjudicated as abusers.
Don't you understand anything about law and the presumption of innocence?
Or shall I accuse you of child abuse and then let you make your way through the legal system to defend your innocence.
Of course, your reputation will NEVER recover.
Accusations of this nature require the utmost care and in the end, The state has no right to break a privileged communication on the 'accusation' of one person to another.
That way leads to Leftist Marxism and authoritarianism.
I'm not Catholic. But I am opposed, and will go to war over it, to the lefts attempt to remove religion from the public square.
.I'm not Catholic. But I am opposed, and will go to war over it, to the lefts attempt to remove religion from the public square.
It’s a shitty point for many reasons, not the least of which that the catholic church has engaged in widespread cover up of child sexual abuse and therefore is not trustworthy.oOO... He found one.
The point is, there are privileged communications in all manner of life and the government is not trustworthy. Even with Trump in the WH, it is not trustworthy.
.It’s a shitty point for many reasons, not the least of which that the catholic church has engaged in widespread cover up of child sexual abuse and therefore is not trustworthy.
.What is the point of confession if you are not going to take responsibility for your sins against another human?
Isn’t part of confession of sins a way to reconcile to God, and if that is the case, isn’t making amends to the wronged person a key part of reconciliation?
Should or does a priest have a moral obligation to protect other children of God to encourage the abuser to go turn himself in?
So confession doesn’t mean you have to make amends? What is the point of confession if you don’t need or have to make amends, seems just empty words..
A priest will always assume that the confession is genuine and appeal to the person confessing to turn himself/herself in to the authorities.
Unless he's one of the twisted leftist priests who just wants a cheap thrill.
.
.So confession doesn’t mean you have to make amends? What is the point of confession if you don’t need or have to make amends, seems just empty words.