Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 21,038
- 6,450
- 335
Your naivete is almost beyond words, but....
The point is they would have chosen their candidate based on the evidence that was in place before the crime. They chose a man who fit the crime. How hard of a concept is that to understand?
And while it is almost certainly true that the FBI has never hired a person off the streets for security, Oswald himself may have been dumb enough to believe them if prompted. He certainly didnt seem to be a shining pillar of intelligence. His IQ was just 103 and he was also emotionally disturbed since childhood and likely easily misled by someone more intelligent than him. Is that also hard to understand? Maybe your IQ is comparable.
I will also give it to you, that he may well have reloaded. However, if he smacked the ejection lever, the remaining loaded bullet or bullets would also have popped out. None were found. So by your logic he would have picked those up yet left the empties. You didn't think about that part. So there's that. Even someone with an IQ of 103 who had already done a good job at evading being caught, and with several years of military training would likely know better.
no you are wrong and that ship has sailed
the naive fools are the gullible sheep falling for conspiracy theories
name this evidence already in place and be specific.
The FBi does not provide security for the president the Secret Service does.
no that is not any sort of logic of mine. Many people replace empty shells from the cylinder of a revolver by picking out the empties and leaving the live ones
Military traning does not cover that sort of thing DUMBASS
You are a failure at this