james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,803
- 170
No, not at all. your dogma makes you think that. Please be more specific about your preferred brand of magical voodoo when complaining about evolution. You do not speak for all theists.Doesn't that replace God?
First, there isn't any magic or voodoo involved with creation science. It's just science and the creation part was accepted as scientific theory before the 1850s.
I already mentioned the explanation without any scientific evidence whatsoever about today's apes and monkeys not being bipedal nor evolving (tailed to tailless, chimps-to-apes or apes-to-chimps, apes to ape-human or chimp-human. That includes both macro and microevolution theories.
Next, we also have the abiogenesis theory and finding aliens on Mars or in outer space somewhere including evidence of past aliens theories. What are these evolution theories suppose to go against (since you do not like the word replaced)? It seems they are there to go against creation science because creation science was there before uniformitarianism, Darwism and evolution came into existence. On one hand, the opposition by creation scientists has been systematically eliminated from secular science, then on the other the atheist or secular scientists have free reign to test or find evidence for whatever silly thing they propose to support evolution. In fact, the ones that goes against creation science the most are the ones who get funded the most. If anything such as the fine tuning facts go against evolution, then it becomes ignored science. The opposition is gone so this can happen. We have examples such as multiverses being discussed like it's already happened.