First of all a gun is not a rifle....
Never said it was. I did say that Oswald didn't bring his pistol (aka gun) with him to the TSBD that morning. Yet after he shot JFK with his rifle, he took precious time out to go home and get it. Thus, it wasn't important before he shot JFK but became important after he did. To me, this is indicative of something changing between the the time he decided to kill JFK and the time after he pulled the trigger.
I think any reasonable person would come to that same conclusion.
the Warren Commission claim that Oswald bought the rifle in question
False.
is unproven and cannot be proven. It was bought by mail order. Anyone under any name could have bought that rifle....
No. Oswald bought the rifle.
if someone wanted to frame oswald....it would have been very easy for them to rent a po box in his name and buy the rifle to make it appear that Oswald bought the rifle.
And then falsify a picture of him holding the rifle, falsify his bringing the rifle to work that day, falsify the DPD finding the rifle where he worked...
You're incredibly wrong about that.
The majority of the American People do not believe the b.s. you and the warren commission spout thus....that places you and your opinion in the cheap seats with all the other dupes.
Oh? Please give us a competing narrative of what happened then. I'm sure you have a much better explanation.
The floor is yours. Go.
The fact that Oswald did not bring his pistol to work but after JFK was assassinated he went directly home and got it....indicates two things...........first he did not shoot JFK...if he had been planning on doing that he most likely would have brought his pistol with him to work....as in it might come in handy during his flight from the scene.
Secondly.....after the assassination he suddenly felt he needed it because he realized he had been set up....and they might come after him next...thus he went home and got it for protection.
At this point he no doubt was utterly terrified as well as confused ....realizing he had gotten himself into the tragic trap of being a Patsy....and for him to be a patsy he would have had to be under the direction of someone....at the very least of getting a job at the school book depository...that had to be arranged by someone....the paines apparantly sent him there to apply for the job....but how did they know about the job opening?...were they part of the plot or just innocent dupes?....did someone tell them to make sure Oswald applied for that job?
How Oswald was involved with the folks who actually shot JFK will probably never be known.
When you see the pictures of Oswald he is obviously very,very angry....why? Most likely because he realized someone he trusted had turned on him and set him up. Why else would he be angry?....if had actually been the shooter as described by the W.C. as someone who just suddenly decided to shoot JFK for the fame, glory or whatever....why would he be angry?...makes no sense...in that scenario he would have been proud and happy to have accomplished his mission.
There are some who believed Oswald had been hypnotized by David Ferrie who Jim Garrision thought was involved with the plot....he had the ability to hypnotize people.
Again, and this is very important to understand......the rifle was bought via mail order.....as I have explained before.....anyone could have rented a po box in oswalds name and ordered the rifle via mail order though the name used was hillel or something like that...apparantly a fake name oswald used....and it would have been even more clever of those who framed oswald to use a fictious name that oswald was known to use...as in it would appear to the authorities he was trying to hide the fact he had bought the rifle. Very clever...whoever framed Oswald was undoubtedly involved in intelligence work.
The picture of Oswald holding the rifle could have been easily arranged by someone....it makes no sense that Oswald would leave the picture lying around and then go shoot JFK with the same rifle he posed with....unless he wanted to be caught which he obviously did not.
Most likely someone persuaded him to pose with the rifle. Not even to mention the controversy of whether the rifle found was a Mauser or the Italian rifle....at first it was identified as a Mauser.
And in fact even if he owned the rifle, had bought it and had taken it to the book depository as claimed....does not prove he was the triggerman.
I read somewhere that he had brought the curtain rods to give to a fellow employee who needed some....which if true the employee most likely would not admit to it for fear of getting involved.
Also to think that an assassin would try to pose a rifle off as curtain rods is rather ridiculous...he would have had to known that in the investigation following the shooting that such a package would be construed to be the manner he got the rifle into the building.
They might have told him to bring the rifle to work giving some excuse or reason to do so...perhaps to buy it or whatever.
I do not think it makes any sense for him to have known what it would be used for....if he knew that...he would never have brought it to work with him because as an employee in the book depository he would have understood he would have been a prime suspect and with his communist background very likely convicted because at that time there was a visceral hatred of communists in society as a whole.
Or it could be he did not even know JFK would be passing by the book depository.
And the claim that Oswald hid the rifle is ridiculous....to leave it by the window that it was fired out of and simply cover it up is not hiding a rifle....a kid might have hidden it that way....but anyone with even average i.q. would have known that it would be easily found...I have no doubt though the rifle was left there by the real assassin to be found in order to easily make it appear Oswald was the shooter.
Also why did he go to the theater after the assassination....was he supposed to meet someone there? Or was it just that he knew the authorities would find out where he lived very quickly so he could not stay at home....thus he had to get out quickly...so he took off...not having any refuge ....he wandered around and decided to hide in the Theater while he thought about what he should do.
All this certainly indicates he had no plan.....thus not the shooter....as in if he had been the shooter he would have had some kind of plan to escape.
To sum up...no real proof Oswald actually bought the rifle.
No proof Oswald was in possession of the rifle on the day of the shooting.
No real proof that Oswald transported the rifle to the book depository...the rifle was not seen in his possession.
No real proof that Oswald was the triggerman.
. Sure. That's seems "reasonable". How many holes in the president would convince you?
