Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Everything you need to know is contained right here.You're literally just too goddamn stupid to be discussing the topic. Anything that the normal people say whooshes right over your head. The cult gave you some talking points, and that settles it for you.
So what? Landmass configurations were different. You'd know that if you were a geologist.LOLOL.
The earth is a lot older than that.
LOLOLOL.
So what? Landmass configurations were different. You'd know that if you were a geologist.
But even our new SCOTUS judge admitted....biologist....geologist.....siesmologist....they don't know shit about shit. Her words, not mine.I'm a geologist. At least I can prove that by speaking knowledgably on the topic.
I doubt very highly you were ever in Oil E&P.
Otherwise you wouldn't have run away from the discussion of the Permo-Triassic earlier.
I know you were faking it.
If you were a geologist you could talk about paleo climates and why they changed using the oxygen isotope curve. Bipolar glaciation has never existed before in earth's history and is the number one driver of earth's climate today. Something you know nothing about.I'm a geologist. At least I can prove that by speaking knowledgably on the topic.
I doubt very highly you were ever in Oil E&P.
Otherwise you wouldn't have run away from the discussion of the Permo-Triassic earlier.
I know you were faking it.
If you were a geologist you could talk about paleo climates
No you haven't. You have no idea why the planet transitioned from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet ~3 million years ago, nor do you understand the importance of that transition for today's climate.Which I have at length.
Ding, you really ought to try to avoid telling other posters what they do and do not understand. It leaves you open to some terrific pwning.No you haven't. You have no idea why the planet transitioned from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet ~3 million years ago, nor do you understand the importance of that transition for today's climate.
The next time that happens will be the first time it happened.Ding, you really ought to try to avoid telling other posters what they do and do not understand. It leaves you open to some terrific pwning.
It would be super awesome if you could actually discuss the earth’s climate.There you go again.
Yeah, because we've never had hurricanes before!It's too late to do anything except spend the millions/billions/trillions to clean up after each natural disaster now.
What facts?Classic idiot behavior. Reject facts out of hand to fit your ignorant preconceived notions.
NASA is also a major player in climate change analysis and has been for years. The mandate of NASA expanded decades ago to focus on earth analysis as well. Which is why many of the leading climate scientists are at NASA with the GISS.
The USGS also deals with some of the forests out here in the West as well. They also work on issues related to rivers and waterbodies as well.
Your view of the division of the sciences is out of date and limited (more like a cartoon without any real technical knowledge of what you are talking about).
The reason is that Jim Hansen is a brainwashed prog who is pushing his agenda.
There's no such thing as "division of the sciences," moron. His view of governments job with respect to science is not to push quackery, which is what it does these days.
What does science say were the conditions that led to the planet transitioning from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet?Let me know when you want to talk about science.
What does science say were the conditions that led to the planet transitioning from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet?
JIim Hansen is a proven liar, so we know NASA isn't spewing out scientific truthsAnd how would you know if NASA spewing out scientific truths ... you're so gullible in that respect ... it's still appealing to authority until Congress passed that mandate on ... NOAA presents the more conservative view, which rarely includes "catastrophism" ...
Do you agree that overplaying the data for sensational headlines is bad for our children's mental health? ...