Actually, according to the narrative, and international politics? Scientifically, you are correct. . . Politically Vegasgiants is correct. This is an epic job of gas-lighting, the establishment wants to conflate science with politics.
Folks need to understand how Codex Alimentarius work, to understand the thinking of bureaucrats behind the AGW scam. They aren't for sure if humans cause it, so, they take the data, and attribute it to humans just in case. The use arbitrary standards, based on political agendas, and then use math, data, and formulas. . . and pass THAT off as, "science," within their models.
NCF Dr Rima Laibow Codex Alimentarius and the Nazi Agenda 21 depoulation plan
Codex work on water use a valuable contribution on World Water Day
Water is an essential resource for food and drink production. With water scarcity worldwide a serious concern, there is a need for industry to address the impact of its water consumption and consider ways in which it can optimise water use in the future whilst ensuring the safety and...
www.newfoodmagazine.com
". . . Regulations established by public health authorities have long been considered a barrier to greater implementation of water reuse in the food industry. However, in recent years, regulators’ perceptions have started to change. The Committee on Food Hygiene of the Codex Alimentarius Commission has published draft guidelines on the hygienic reuse of processing water in food plants. These acknowledge that ‘while water should be reconditioned to a level safe and suitable for its intended use, reconditioning to the level of potable water is unnecessary in many cases’. However, regarding reuse water for incorporation into a food product, it insists on meeting at least the microbiological and, where necessary, chemical specifications for potable water4."
Actually, according to the narrative, and international politics? Scientifically, you are correct. . . Politically Vegasgiants is correct. This is an epic job of gas-lighting, the establishment wants to conflate science with politics.
Folks need to understand how Codex Alimentarius work, to understand the thinking of bureaucrats behind the AGW scam. They aren't for sure if humans cause it, so, they take the data, and attribute it to humans just in case. The use arbitrary standards, based on political agendas, and then use math, data, and formulas. . . and pass THAT off as, "science," within their models.
NCF Dr Rima Laibow Codex Alimentarius and the Nazi Agenda 21 depoulation plan
Codex work on water use a valuable contribution on World Water Day
Water is an essential resource for food and drink production. With water scarcity worldwide a serious concern, there is a need for industry to address the impact of its water consumption and consider ways in which it can optimise water use in the future whilst ensuring the safety and...
www.newfoodmagazine.com
". . . Regulations established by public health authorities have long been considered a barrier to greater implementation of water reuse in the food industry. However, in recent years, regulators’ perceptions have started to change. The Committee on Food Hygiene of the Codex Alimentarius Commission has published draft guidelines on the hygienic reuse of processing water in food plants. These acknowledge that ‘while water should be reconditioned to a level safe and suitable for its intended use, reconditioning to the level of potable water is unnecessary in many cases’. However, regarding reuse water for incorporation into a food product, it insists on meeting at least the microbiological and, where necessary, chemical specifications for potable water4."
You already habitually ignore science research I post thus you are a liar.
Remember the listed 135 published papers I linked and posted the first paper that shows low CO2 doubling values doesn't promote much warming?
Remember you continually dodging the scientist Westfall asking you this at POST 417
"Still waiting for you to detail the emergency."
your reply was the usual dodge you do:
"Think of it this way. You are a young and stupid 20 something who is in the habit of driving your 1974 Dodge Dart down country roads in the midwest (where they are straight as an arrow for miles and miles). You drive at crazy speeds and since it's 1983 you do it without a seatbelt. Just crazy stupid stuff.
At some point you WILL crash. You will hit something, or something will jump out of the corn rows on either side and you WILL be seriously injured. Horrifically so.
Do you stop and start driving more safely and wear your seatbelt? Or do you simply assume that since nothing bad has happened so far, there's no problem?
That's the emergency. We KNOW that climate change is happening. We don't know exactly how bad it might be in the long haul but we know it will NOT be better. IF we are lucky the impacts will be only mildly bad (maybe a severe economic depression as climate refugees flood the inland areas stressing the infrastructure etc.). Or it will be VERY bad as we collapse vast swaths of the argicultural infrastructure we've developed over 4 centuries on this continent.
Change in the basics is betting against the house in Las Vegas. Sure you MIGHT walk out of the casino a multi-millionaire, but the odds are VERY MUCH AGAINST YOU."
===
What a stupid reply as there were ZERO science based evidence to answer that simple question. just a patented Gook powered verbal diarrhea is what you ginned up.
www.newfoodmagazine.com
climate.nasa.gov
