Warmers are Neurotic Basket Cases

[Sunsettommy]

Oh look ....another personal attack. Lol

Oh look another dodging of this: "CO2 warm forcing effect is very small and smaller over time."

You will eventually get exposed as the troll you are well known to be elsewhere since you are not here to really discuss anything of substance.

 

[Vegasgiants]

Oh look another dodging of this: "CO2 warm forcing effect is very small and smaller over time."

You will eventually get exposed as the troll you are well known to be elsewhere since you are not here to really discuss anything of substance.

So you say....with no evidence. Lol

 

[MisterBeale]

No it isn't. You analyze the water, provided there are no poisons, or toxic materials it is safe.

No consensus. It is yes/no.

Actually, according to the narrative, and international politics? Scientifically, you are correct. . . Politically Vegasgiants is correct. This is an epic job of gas-lighting, the establishment wants to conflate science with politics.

Folks need to understand how Codex Alimentarius work, to understand the thinking of bureaucrats behind the AGW scam. They aren't for sure if humans cause it, so, they take the data, and attribute it to humans just in case. The use arbitrary standards, based on political agendas, and then use math, data, and formulas. . . and pass THAT off as, "science," within their models.

NCF Dr Rima Laibow Codex Alimentarius and the Nazi Agenda 21 depoulation plan​

Codex work on water use a valuable contribution on World Water Day​

Codex work on water use a valuable contribution on World Water Day | CODEXALIMENTARIUS

www.fao.org

1 Codex Standard 108-1981
Adopted 1981. Amendment 2001, 2011. Revisions 1997, 2008.
CODEX STANDARD FOR NATURAL MINERAL WATERS

https://www.fao.org/input/download/standards/223/CXS_108e.pdf

Water reuse and recycling in the food industry

Water is an essential resource for food and drink production. With water scarcity worldwide a serious concern, there is a need for industry to address the impact of its water consumption and consider ways in which it can optimise water use in the future whilst ensuring the safety and...

www.newfoodmagazine.com

". . . Regulations established by public health authorities have long been considered a barrier to greater implementation of water reuse in the food industry. However, in recent years, regulators’ perceptions have started to change. The Committee on Food Hygiene of the Codex Alimentarius Commission has published draft guidelines on the hygienic reuse of processing water in food plants. These acknowledge that ‘while water should be reconditioned to a level safe and suitable for its intended use, reconditioning to the level of potable water is unnecessary in many cases’. However, regarding reuse water for incorporation into a food product, it insists on meeting at least the microbiological and, where necessary, chemical specifications for potable water4."

 

[Sunsettommy]

So you say....with no evidence. Lol

You know the truth since you have been banned from several forums but I can't post the forum names here for the obvious reasons.

Meanwhile you still avoid discussing the science stuff, third time I post this,

"CO2 warm forcing effect is very small and smaller over time."

 

[Vegasgiants]

You know the truth since you have been banned from several forums but I can't post the forum names here for the obvious reasons.

Meanwhile you still avoid discussing the science stuff, third time I post this,

"CO2 warm forcing effect is very small and smaller over time."

Let's discuss it


I see no evidence of that claim

 

[Cardinal Carminative]

What a stupid reply since you make clear you going to ignore post one article because as many have learned you are mainly here for trolling.

Let me know when you post something of value.

 

[Oddball]

Actually, according to the narrative, and international politics? Scientifically, you are correct. . . Politically Vegasgiants is correct. This is an epic job of gas-lighting, the establishment wants to conflate science with politics.

Folks need to understand how Codex Alimentarius work, to understand the thinking of bureaucrats behind the AGW scam. They aren't for sure if humans cause it, so, they take the data, and attribute it to humans just in case. The use arbitrary standards, based on political agendas, and then use math, data, and formulas. . . and pass THAT off as, "science," within their models.

NCF Dr Rima Laibow Codex Alimentarius and the Nazi Agenda 21 depoulation plan​

Codex work on water use a valuable contribution on World Water Day​

Codex work on water use a valuable contribution on World Water Day | CODEXALIMENTARIUS

www.fao.org

1 Codex Standard 108-1981
Adopted 1981. Amendment 2001, 2011. Revisions 1997, 2008.
CODEX STANDARD FOR NATURAL MINERAL WATERS

https://www.fao.org/input/download/standards/223/CXS_108e.pdf

Water reuse and recycling in the food industry

Water is an essential resource for food and drink production. With water scarcity worldwide a serious concern, there is a need for industry to address the impact of its water consumption and consider ways in which it can optimise water use in the future whilst ensuring the safety and...

www.newfoodmagazine.com

". . . Regulations established by public health authorities have long been considered a barrier to greater implementation of water reuse in the food industry. However, in recent years, regulators’ perceptions have started to change. The Committee on Food Hygiene of the Codex Alimentarius Commission has published draft guidelines on the hygienic reuse of processing water in food plants. These acknowledge that ‘while water should be reconditioned to a level safe and suitable for its intended use, reconditioning to the level of potable water is unnecessary in many cases’. However, regarding reuse water for incorporation into a food product, it insists on meeting at least the microbiological and, where necessary, chemical specifications for potable water4."

 

[Vegasgiants]

View attachment 632502

Memes!!!!!!!!! Lol

 

[Sunsettommy]

Let's discuss it


I see no evidence of that claim

You have seen it many times therefore either your brain is full of Swiss cheese, or you are playing games as you normally do.

I made the statement you didn't address it because you know you can't which is why you throw it back.

When I post the evidence that isn't even under dispute by scientists on your side since the is 101 stuff that has been understood for years.

AGW comes in two parts, and YOU have no idea what it is because you ignore the answer over and over.

What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?

 

[Vegasgiants]

You have seen it many times therefore either your brain is full of Swiss cheese, or you are playing games as you normally do.

I made the statement you didn't address it because you know you can't which is why you throw it back.

When I post the evidence that isn't even under dispute by scientists on your side since the is 101 stuff that has been understood for years.

AGW comes in two parts, and YOU have no idea what it is because you ignore the answer over and over.

What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?

Ok no evidence

Dismissed

 

[Sunsettommy]

Let me know when you post something of value.

You already habitually ignore science research I post thus you are a liar.

Remember the listed 135 published papers I linked and posted the first paper that shows low CO2 doubling values doesn't promote much warming?

Remember you continually dodging the scientist Westfall asking you this at POST 417

"Still waiting for you to detail the emergency."

your reply was the usual dodge you do:

"Think of it this way. You are a young and stupid 20 something who is in the habit of driving your 1974 Dodge Dart down country roads in the midwest (where they are straight as an arrow for miles and miles). You drive at crazy speeds and since it's 1983 you do it without a seatbelt. Just crazy stupid stuff.

At some point you WILL crash. You will hit something, or something will jump out of the corn rows on either side and you WILL be seriously injured. Horrifically so.

Do you stop and start driving more safely and wear your seatbelt? Or do you simply assume that since nothing bad has happened so far, there's no problem?

That's the emergency. We KNOW that climate change is happening. We don't know exactly how bad it might be in the long haul but we know it will NOT be better. IF we are lucky the impacts will be only mildly bad (maybe a severe economic depression as climate refugees flood the inland areas stressing the infrastructure etc.). Or it will be VERY bad as we collapse vast swaths of the argicultural infrastructure we've developed over 4 centuries on this continent.

Change in the basics is betting against the house in Las Vegas. Sure you MIGHT walk out of the casino a multi-millionaire, but the odds are VERY MUCH AGAINST YOU."

===

What a stupid reply as there were ZERO science based evidence to answer that simple question. just a patented Gook powered verbal diarrhea is what you ginned up.

No details at all.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Ok no evidence

Dismissed

LOL I gave you something to start with but your inability to understand it is made obvious:

"What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?"

I wonder if you even have a clue what this is.

 

[Vegasgiants]

LOL I gave you something to start with but your inability to understand it is made obvious:

"What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?"

I wonder if you even have a clue what this is.

Post your evidence

 

[Sunsettommy]

Post your evidence

You still don't know what it means, and it is one of the answers about the Logarithmic of CO2 warm forcing.

Your ignorance is screaming loud!

THINK little child.....

"What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?"

This is 101 stuff and you don't even recognize it!

 

[Vegasgiants]

You still don't know what it means, and it is one of the answers about the Logarithmic of CO2 warm forcing.

Your ignorance is screaming loud!

THINK little child.....

"What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?"

This is 101 stuff and you don't even recognize it!

Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

The rate of change since the mid-20th century is unprecedented over millennia.

climate.nasa.gov

 

[Oddball]

Memes!!!!!!!!! Lol

A meme that accurately depicts how you warmer cultists have perverted science, sock-o.

 

[Vegasgiants]

A meme that accurately depicts how you warmer cultists have perverted science, sock-o.

Memes!!!!!!!!


HAHAHAHAHA

 

[Sunsettommy]

Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

The rate of change since the mid-20th century is unprecedented over millennia.

climate.nasa.gov

Here is his typical dodge to a website with no detail offered.

It is clear you don't understand this:

"What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?"

 

[Vegasgiants]

Here is his typical dodge to a website with no detail offered.

It is clear you don't understand this:

"What does MODTRAN results show for declining CO2 warm forcing effect as the gas increases in the atmosphere?"

You dont know?


HAHAHAHAHA

 

[Sunsettommy]

You dont know?


HAHAHAHAHA

Yup it is confirmed you don't know what MODTRAN is.

Go play in the sandbox I am done with you.