Oddball
Unobtanium Member
- Thread starter
- #161
Oooo.....The self-licking ice cream cone known as NASA!![]()
Climate Change - NASA Science
NASA is a global leader in studying Earth’s changing climate.climate.nasa.gov
pffffffft
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oooo.....The self-licking ice cream cone known as NASA!![]()
Climate Change - NASA Science
NASA is a global leader in studying Earth’s changing climate.climate.nasa.gov
How that "agreement" is reached is that nobody can disprove that the procedure for treatment of the water is safe and effective....The Socratic method, which brings on all comers to prove it to themselves.....That's fucking science, you fucking pig-headed silly ass.Yes it is. They only choose the tests that have large agreement are effective. That is consensus
Actually science NEVER proves anything. That is pretty basic stuff. LOLHBow that "agreement" is reached is that nobody can disprove that the treatment of the water is safe and eveftive....That's fucking since, you fucking silly ass.
I accept your concessionOK....So you're a fucking nihilist....Glad we cleared that up.
Okay dokey pokeyI concede nothing, other than that you're obviously a nihilist....And very probably a sock to boot.
Have a great day. LOLWhatever, sock-o.
The test to confirm that was agreed upon by consensus you silly potato. LOL
And the results agreed up and confirmed by othersNo, it wasn't you retard. The LD50 is determined by EXPERIMENTATION. Not talking about it.
DURRRRRR
I am afraid, it is worse than that. .. .Climate cultism is a form of mental illness.
So no consensus. Thanks
Wow. I have a stalker. LolHa ha it appears the other forum finally got tired of you so you come here and post over 525 time in just 36 hours.
![]()
![]()
Typical overreliance on consensus fallacies since it doesn't prove anything at all consensus errors are many which warmist/alarmists ignore every day.
Reproducible research is what drives science.
And the results agreed up and confirmed by others
Consensus
A wide variety of things have caused temperature changes in the past. Now its AGW
Wow. I have a stalker. Lol
Yes there isNo, REPEATED by others to confirm the result of the experiment. It is either yes or no.
There is no consensus
A wide variety of things have caused temperature changes in the past. Now its AGW
Oh look ....another personal attack. LolA typical evidence/fact free reply from a warmist Gook who can't get past the consensus drivel to realize that CO2 warm forcing effect is very small and smaller over time.