War With Syria: Yea Or Nay?

[Kondor3]

Nope. Just about every politiican has declared allegiance to the zionist regime so they will vote yes.

Oh, horseshit, this has nothing to do with Zionism...

Pig puke...everything happening in the Middle East today stems from racist Zionists inflicting a Jewish state upon Palestine in 1948 IN SPITE of the fact there were twice as many non-Jews as Jews living between the River and the sea at that time.

\

Yer a funny guy, Georgie...

 

[georgephillip]

Oh, horseshit, this has nothing to do with Zionism...

Pig puke...everything happening in the Middle East today stems from racist Zionists inflicting a Jewish state upon Palestine in 1948 IN SPITE of the fact there were twice as many non-Jews as Jews living between the River and the sea at that time.

\

Yer a funny guy, Georgie...

As funny as Ze'ev?

"There can be no voluntary agreement between ourselves and the Palestine Arabs. Not now, nor in the prospective future. I say this with such conviction, not because I want to hurt the moderate Zionists. I do not believe that they will be hurt. Except for those who were born blind, they realised long ago that it is utterly impossible to obtain the voluntary consent of the Palestine Arabs for converting 'Palestine' from an Arab country into a country with a Jewish majority."

"The Iron Wall" by Ze'ev (Vladimir Jabotinsky

What racist wouldn't chuckle at that?

 

[Kondor3]

This thread is about the prospect of war or war-like action against Syria...

This is not supposed to be a vehicle for your incessant pro-Palestinian propagandizing against Israel and the Jews...

 

[georgephillip]

This thread is about the prospect of war or war-like action against Syria...

This is not supposed to be a vehicle for your incessant pro-Palestinian propagandizing against Israel and the Jews...

The "prospect of war or war-like action against Syria" today can't be separated from 650,000 Jews inflicting their nation upon twice as many Arabs in Palestine in 1948 or similar provocations like Operation Orchard in 2007.

 

[Kondor3]

This thread is about the prospect of war or war-like action against Syria...

This is not supposed to be a vehicle for your incessant pro-Palestinian propagandizing against Israel and the Jews...

The "prospect of war or war-like action against Syria" today can't be separated from 650,000 Jews inflicting their nation upon twice as many Arabs in Palestine in 1948 or similar provocations like Operation Orchard in 2007.

Seen.

 

[paulitician]

And what about all the innocent Civilians who will be killed in this coming attack on Syria? I haven't seen anyone address that yet on this thread. This attack is going to kill innocent Men, Women, and Children. Just like the Thousands we've slaughtered in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. This isn't a TV Show or an Action Movie. Real Women & Children die in these attacks. We are very accurate with our weapons. The most accurate in the World. But they still kill many innocent Civilians. Shooting missiles from ships hundreds of miles out at sea, will result in the needless slaughter of Civilians.

Unfortunately, too many Americans don't like reality. So they try and ignore it. They pretend it's a TV Show or Movie. Personally, i cannot support murdering even one Syrian Civilian. Assad and Syria have done nothing to my Nation. They've given me no cause to hate them or kill them. I would like to see this issue discussed more on this thread. Your Leaders are about to kill many innocent Men, Women, and Children in your name. How do you feel about that?

On my last forum, Dale in Sales went into incredible detail of just how many died in Iraq and Afghanistan, but the ridicule he received for it was unreal. I don't know why not a single person made a single attempt to support his approach. It was such a fiasco, that it has made me feel very reluctant to go down that road at all. It's just not worth it, and if people aren't intelligent enough to realize this themselves or even make any comments about it, what can you do?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnYmoWO-ts4]Dale in Sales calls Howard about the War in Iraq - YouTube[/ame]

I fully support what you are saying here, but I'm not going to stick my neck out on it unless others do.

Americans especially, despise reality. Our weapons are the most accurate in the World. But they still kill many innocent Men, Women, and Children. Personally, i will not support killing even one Syrian Civilian. It's not a video game or movie. It's real. Real children are brutally slaughtered in these attacks. The 'It's ok, cause it's collateral damage' crowd should be ashamed of themselves. There is no justification for this War. Period, end of story.

 

[paulitician]

Looks like the American People are winning on this one so far. Their voice is being heard. And that's a pretty incredible refreshing change.

 

[Kondor3]

Looks like the American People are winning on this one so far. Their voice is being heard. And that's a pretty incredible refreshing change.

Indeed.

And it's about flippin' time...!

 

[U2Edge]

I have not voted in this poll because its not asking the right question. Going to War with Syria and launching a limited missile strike are two different things. You will get different poll results depending how the poll is worded! Unfortunately the mods have closed my poll with the different wording. I hope they re-open it.

 

[paulitician]

I have not voted in this poll because its not asking the right question. Going to War with Syria and launching a limited missile strike are two different things. You will get different poll results depending how the poll is worded! Unfortunately the mods have closed my poll with the different wording. I hope they re-open it.

I hear ya, but try to approach it from another angle. If another Nation began bombing the U.S., would you consider that a 'limited missile strike' or an act of War?

 

[whitehall]

There is no possibility of "war with". The only question is whether we will punish Syria or not. My guess is that the president is weighing the political impact which is the only thing democrats ever worry about.

 

[paulitician]

 

[paulitician]

There is no possibility of "war with". The only question is whether we will punish Syria or not. My guess is that the president is weighing the political impact which is the only thing democrats ever worry about.

Not our call to 'punish' anyone. There is no valid argument for our involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Period, end of story.

 

[Kondor3]

I have not voted in this poll because its not asking the right question. Going to War with Syria and launching a limited missile strike are two different things. You will get different poll results depending how the poll is worded! Unfortunately the mods have closed my poll with the different wording. I hope they re-open it.

The firing of missiles, or bombing, directed against a foreign government, is an Act of War.

The survey question ( War: Yes or No? ) was correct, both literally and figuratively.

I do not mean this in an unkind way, but, I will repeat something that I said on this board in the past couple of days...

Every thinking person over the age of 10 who sees that question, knows what is meant...

War can be big or small, declared or undeclared, long or short, cheap or costly, bombing-only or full-scale invasion...

The survey question paints with a broad brush - on the macro level - and is sufficient to our purposes...

"No" means no.

"Yes" can mean missile strikes or bombing or full-scale invasion or whatever; TBD later.

I agree with you that it would be good to have more detailed insights into how folks would like to proceed, if the audience chooses military action, and there may very well be room for such a poll in the coming days, especially if Congress and/or the President end-up taking action that contravenes our own little survey mechanism, but, at present, it seems best to simply take the pulse of the audience as to whether we should take ANY action, rather than muddying the waters with details at this early stage in the game.

The mods can speak for themselves but, at first glance, that's MY guess as to why they chose to ask the audience to focus on the existing one... first things first, so-to-speak. I would craft an Action Survey with more options than the one you served-up but your idea is sound... it's merely a bit premature, methinks... nor not...

For whatever that's worth...

 

[Contumacious]

There is no possibility of "war with". The only question is whether we will punish Syria or not. My guess is that the president is weighing the political impact which is the only thing democrats ever worry about.

WHY are we going to punish Syria when we didn't punish Clinton and those who gassed and incinerated the Davidians?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?


.

 

[The Rabbi]

There is no possibility of "war with". The only question is whether we will punish Syria or not. My guess is that the president is weighing the political impact which is the only thing democrats ever worry about.

Not our call to 'punish' anyone. There is no valid argument for our involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Period, end of story.

"Valid"="Whatever Ron Paul says is valid".

There are many valid reasons for acting here.

 

[georgephillip]

This thread is about the prospect of war or war-like action against Syria...

This is not supposed to be a vehicle for your incessant pro-Palestinian propagandizing against Israel and the Jews...

The "prospect of war or war-like action against Syria" today can't be separated from 650,000 Jews inflicting their nation upon twice as many Arabs in Palestine in 1948 or similar provocations like Operation Orchard in 2007.

Seen.

"seen
sēn...
1.
past participle of see1."

https://www.google.com/#q=seen

 

[Contumacious]

UNITED STATES USE OF BIOCHEMICAL WEAPONS AT HOME

.

 

[antiquity]

There is no possibility of "war with". The only question is whether we will punish Syria or not. My guess is that the president is weighing the political impact which is the only thing democrats ever worry about.

Not our call to 'punish' anyone. There is no valid argument for our involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Period, end of story.

What was Clinton reason for interfering with the civil war in Serbia?

 

[Hoffstra]

Wow, a massive majority of the members of this forum say no to war on Syria.

thats good to know.