Walz compares American Law Officers to German Nazis

He never claimed to have served in combat. You're just so desperate to slag this man and you're willing to lie to do it. How typical of you.

He served, for 30 years, which is more than Captain Bonespurs was willing to serve.
'misspoke' or not, he claimed to have carried it in war.

you wouldn't allow a republican to get away with something like that.

and as far as 'porridge brain' Biden has had little besides mush between his ears since before he left the senate.
 
The Dems are in full Bizarro World as the former VP candidate compares ICE agents trying to protect our nation from illegal aliens to murderous Nazis gathering up law-abiding Jewish citizens for slaughter.

They have turned everything upside down - casting illegal aliens as poor innocent victims and the Americans trying to protect our citizens from the harm they do as the evil Gestapo - as they work to flood the country with unskilled, uneducated, semi-literate and often violent foreigners.

So, grandma propaganda, it’s white and shiny for an old phax obsessed woman.
 
This is the kind of response from someone who is so indoctrinated and impossible to have a reasonable adult conversation.

It is adult of you to call Trump a facist but not for me to call your party Communist. How does that work or are they both hyperbolic? Think about it.
 
It is adult of you to call Trump a facist but not for me to call your party Communist. How does that work or are they both hyperbolic? Think about it.

Only if you can defend the accusation.

Trump is rounding up people he finds undesirable and sending them to foreign prisons without allowing for any judicial oversight.

Trump is arresting people because they expressed an opinion in a student newspaper he finds objectionable.

That seems pretty fascist.
 
The fact that you consider yourself a rational adult and independent thinker is absolutely astounding. You are an expert at self-deception.

Yeah, ok. Whatever you say. Democrats have a knack of believing they are always right. That is part of the indoctrination I guess.

As for this due process thing. You are merely parroting what you hear. Illegals don't have the same due process as those here legally. Maybe we will get a SC ruling on it.

On a side note, I can hardly wait to come back to point out just how wrong you were about the economy.
 
Yeah, ok. Whatever you say. Democrats have a knack of believing they are always right. That is part of the indoctrination I guess.

As for this due process thing. You are merely parroting what you hear. Illegals don't have the same due process as those here legally. Maybe we will get a SC ruling on it.

On a side note, I can hardly wait to come back to point out just how wrong you were about the economy.

Everyone has a right to habeas corpus, at least until Trump decides to get rid of that (illegally).

You do know what habeas corpus is, right?
 
I note your entire lack of a counterargument means you admit defeat on the point. He is a dick of the highest order, but he never stole anyone's valor, because he has none.
You obviously have no clue WTF stolen valor is, Gilligan.
 
The campaign has both acknowledged that Governor Walz misspoke and did not intend to infer that he served in a war zone, and they did that as soon as he made that remark. Governor Walz did carry that weapon while the US was at war, but he didn't carry while he was personally serving in the war zone, although he did serve overseas.

He made no claim of "stolen valor", claimed no heroic behaviour or actions while in the military.
Yes, he did make a claim that was stolen valor. Making idiotic excuses when caught doesn't change that fact.
 
'misspoke' or not, he claimed to have carried it in war.

you wouldn't allow a republican to get away with something like that.

and as far as 'porridge brain' Biden has had little besides mush between his ears since before he left the senate.
I don't think someone can forget they didn't serve in combat.
 
Everyone has a right to habeas corpus, at least until Trump decides to get rid of that (illegally).

You do know what habeas corpus is, right?

Nowhere in the clause does it state which branch has the right to suspend the writ. Sure, most may agree it requires Congress, but that would have to be decided by an interpretation by the SC. Technically, they would have to interject their opinion that Congress must do so. It is NOT in the Constitution. In fact, Lincoln did it during the Civil War without the consent of Congress. Yes, Congress later approved the decision, but that doesn’t negate the fact that he exercised his authority to do it first.

On that note, I am not saying that he should or shouldn’t do it, I am just pointing out that it is not illegal as you state. That is up for interpretation.
 
15th post
It's not a trial, but an administrative hearing to determine if they're even here legally or to appeal to the court before you send them to a gulag.

We don’t have time for that either due to the shear numbers thanks to Biden. The hearing is to show their legal paperwork. They don’t have it, then sayonara.
 
And then Trump turned around and granted asylum to a foreign antisemite from South Africa.

Disagreeing with Israeli foreign policy does not make one anti-semitic.

Yet disagreeing with Obama made you a racist. Weird.
 
We don’t have time for that either due to the shear numbers thanks to Biden. The hearing is to show their legal paperwork. They don’t have it, then sayonara.

Remind me what part of the constitution says laws don’t apply if you don’t “have time for that”.
 
Remind me what part of the constitution says laws don’t apply if you don’t “have time for that”.

As far as removing illegals, due process isn’t what you think it is, but thanks to Biden ignoring the law, even the process of removing them is almost untenable. For some reason, your side is cool with what Biden did or didn’t do at the border.

As far as investigating each and every vote, that is the beauty of the cheat. Don’t secure it before the vote, make them attempt to investigate each and every vote afterwards and then claim there is no “widespread” voter fraud.
 
Back
Top Bottom