Wall Street Journal criticizes Trump's economic proposed policies

That whole trial was a fraud, Arlette. Corrupt DA...corrupt judge...biased jury. Half a billion dollars on a charge that's never been brought against any other person and a "crime" with no victim? There is a reason why Trump's "conviction" didn't hurt him in the election...people know that it's lawfare not justice.
It was Trump that falsified business records. Nobody else. That's why he was found guilty and not some other entity.
 
Trump's economic plan is spelled out in plain English at Project 2025. It's more tax cuts for corporations and billionaires.
 
Sit down, be sure to take your lunch and lose eight pounds, in a about six months you'll be down to about 200

Be careful
It's the soda that makes the difference. I cut all soda out, only alcoholic beverages for me
 
It was Trump that falsified business records. Nobody else. That's why he was found guilty and not some other entity.
He was found guilty because the judge was a joke. It's why that verdict will be overturned on appeal when it gets to an unbiased court.
 
He was found guilty because the judge was a joke. It's why that verdict will be overturned on appeal when it gets to an unbiased court.
He was found guilty because the evidence showed he was guilty. You are defending a man who stole from cancer kids.
 
But you don't mention your cult leader had the last say. Also your cult leader put together the initial budget sent to Congress.
MAGA is always trying to make their cult leader look good with lies or stretching the truth.
You lost this thread a long time ago, simp.
 
It is. It ended up being slightly higher than Trump's 4 year addition to the debt. Trump says it was because of COVID. Biden had to deal for COVID for multiple years.
But COVID ws not the reason for either one of their entire debt.
Biden declared the pandemic over just a few months into his regime, Stupid.
 
He was found guilty because the evidence showed he was guilty. You are defending a man who stole from cancer kids.
He was found "guilty" because a partisan DA teamed up with a partisan judge and a partisan jury to commit "lawfare"! It was a disgraceful display by the New York Justice System and those who took part should be ashamed of themselves!
 
He was found "guilty" because a partisan DA teamed up with a partisan judge and a partisan jury to commit "lawfare"! It was a disgraceful display by the New York Justice System and those who took part should be ashamed of themselves!
Actually, it was a bench trial. Trump was subject to a summary judgement.
 
In my example, Elmer...revenue went up...yet the "family" was still over budget because they spent too much. With Trump's tax cuts revenue also went up...yet we were over budget because we spent too much. You're so fixated on revenue that you can't seem to get it through your head that it's spending that driving the deficit bus and we're never going to get the deficit under control unless we get spending under control. Kamala's solution to all things dealing with the economy is for the government to give more things away.

As for the classes I've taken? I have an MBA from Boston University. I'll try and dumb it down for you! :)
If you have an MBA. I do also. You have taken more than one class on cost accounting. Based on what you have been saying you were not listening. Basic cost-benefit analysis on revenue and costs is the basics of budgeting.
First if there had not been a tax cut it was predicted the revenues would be up 4% while they were up .3%. If costs stayed the same, the addition to the debt would have been less.
What should be done to take care of the debt is to cut costs substantially. We also need to increase revenue a substantial amount.
American on both sides of the political spectrum are all for cutting costs just so it will not take any of their benefits away. But it will. People are allfor raising other people's taxes, just not their own.
 
Biden declared the pandemic over just a few months into his regime, Stupid.
Do you ever tell the truth?
The federal COVID-19 PHE declaration ended on May 11, 2023. Most tools, like vaccines, treatments, and testing, will remain available.
 
15th post
If you have an MBA. I do also. You have taken more than one class on cost accounting. Based on what you have been saying you were not listening. Basic cost-benefit analysis on revenue and costs is the basics of budgeting.
First if there had not been a tax cut it was predicted the revenues would be up 4% while they were up .3%. If costs stayed the same, the addition to the debt would have been less.
What should be done to take care of the debt is to cut costs substantially. We also need to increase revenue a substantial amount.
American on both sides of the political spectrum are all for cutting costs just so it will not take any of their benefits away. But it will. People are allfor raising other people's taxes, just not their own.
I notice that you ignored my example of what happened when New Jersey implemented a "millionaires tax", Elmer. Revenues were predicted to go up when that took place. They actually went down and they went down substantially. So much for putting stock in revenue projections.
You've declared that cutting costs in government will result in the loss of people's benefits? That might be true if government was running efficiently. As a fellow MBA is that the case that you're making? That the government IS efficient? That our only choice is between cutting benefits or raising taxes?
 
Do you ever tell the truth?
The federal COVID-19 PHE declaration ended on May 11, 2023. Most tools, like vaccines, treatments, and testing, will remain available.
When did Tater declare it was over?
 
I notice that you ignored my example of what happened when New Jersey implemented a "millionaires tax", Elmer. Revenues were predicted to go up when that took place. They actually went down and they went down substantially. So much for putting stock in revenue projections.
You've declared that cutting costs in government will result in the loss of people's benefits? That might be true if government was running efficiently. As a fellow MBA is that the case that you're making? That the government IS efficient? That our only choice is between cutting benefits or raising taxes?
I am not arguing any single plan to add revenue or reduce costs.
At the end of the day, you have to find a way that works, for both. No excuses.
 
When did Tater declare it was over?
He made a comment on 9/18/2022 that the worst of the pandemic is over
he signed the federal COVID-19 PHE declaration ended on May 11, 2023. Most tools, like vaccines, treatments, and testing, will remain available.

Nostra is a blatant liar.
 
Back
Top Bottom