WalMart is not only an economic menace to any and every place it places its flag. It is also, when it decides to become the arbitor of what is socially acceptable in the arts, a menace to the free exchange of ideas that come of free speech in the arts.
Should WALMART be given that much power?
Of course not.
WALMART is a corporation...a creature whose existence depends on the laws of the land and the tolerance of the citizens of that land to exist at all.
It should not have rights, and it should certainly not be allowed to pretend that it has anything remotely approaching the RIGHT to censor the arts.
I realize that many of you believe that this sort of business is nothing more than a giagantic mom and pop store. You're completely wrong in assuming that.
I realize that many of you think it should have all the rights that the CITIZEN who owns a store might have, too.
WALMART is not a CITIZEN doing business.
It is a corporation, a legal fictional entity.
It is beholden to the people of the USA, and not the other way around.
WALMART is a symptom of the disease which is destroying our society, folks.
I don't entirely blame WALMART for becoming that because, after all, our laws have allowed it to thrive.
But I defintiely do think that we have allowed an economically predatory corporation to sytematically rape our nation.
The net effect of a WALMART coming into an economic community is an increase in poverty with all the adverse economic fallout which results from same.
And now we are going to allow this corporation to dictate artistic tastes, too?
Sad. Very sad.
Sadder still that many of you cannot understand what I am even talking about.