So what? If that was the case, you get a lawyer and you argue it in court.
You obviously didn't read Dick Reavis' book,
The Ashes of Waco, in which he exhaustively quotes Koresh's lawyer, Dick DeGuerin, who was the only private citizen afforded access to Koresh which was limited to one brief visit. The FBI denied any further access to DeGuerin, citing concern for DeGuerin's safety, which DeGuerin dismissed as subterfuge.
From the very beginning of that standoff Koresh's demand for access to the media, either directly or through his lawyer, was, except for that one brief visit, strenuously avoided. The Press (and the public in general) was confined to an area two full miles from the site of the standoff -- supposedly for their safety. The only thing they (and the public) knew about what was going on was what the FBI told them.
Dozens of reporters pleaded for access to Koresh by telephone, which was denied. This blanket of secrecy convinced Koresh that he would never have access to public opinion, whether via the media by telephone from behind the walls of the compound or in a court of Law. The pivotal question here is
why was Koresh denied this access.
Are you not personally offended by it?
You don't go shooting at the LEO's serving it (a flawed warrant).
It seems that either you are some kind of LEO, or you're a textbook authoritarian personality, or you're both. I believe this because I know two New York City police officers who have candidly condemned the actions of the feds at Waco, both BATF and FBI/HRT (Hostage "Rescue" Team).
Going further; you might not be aware that the jury in a Texas state criminal court
acquitted each of the Branch Davidians who admitted returning fire when the ATF stormed their residence. This acquittal was based on the fact that in accordance with Texas state law the ATF's actions were unlawful, excessively aggressive, and the Davidians had a right to defend their home against them.
JURY ACQUITS CULT MEMBERS OF MURDER IN WACO SHOOTOUT
The federal courts take a different view of the situation. So whichever point of view you happen to agree with will serve as an indicator of your personal orientation in the matter of civil rights and the rights of citizens in relation to the law-enforcement establishment.[/quote]