VP Candidate Tim Kaine: Bill Clinton Treats Women In 'Intolerable' Ways (Oh My!)

Steve_McGarrett

Gold Member
Jul 11, 2013
19,272
4,378
280
I see absolutely no downsides to Kaine saying this about his running mates’ husband. Not for him, not for her, not for the campaign.

VP CANDIDATE KAINE'S Past Criticism Of Bill Clinton Surfaces...Made BOLD Statement On Philandering President » 100percentfedUp.com

Bill Clinton treats women in ‘intolearble’ ways, should have resigned - said Hillary’s VP Tim Kaine

daviddukeforussentate.jpg
 
Last edited:
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.
Hillary has stated she intends Bill to be a force in her cabinet revitalizing the economy. With that said, he's fair game.

daviddukeforussentate.jpg
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.
Hillary has stated she intends Bill to be a force in her cabinet revitalizing the economy. With that said, he's fair game.

daviddukeforussentate.jpg
Maybe Drumpf will win after all?......Naw not a snowballs chance in hell. :laugh:
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

She is but Steve is confused once again and I will never tell about his other confusion but her name was Lola!



And before you write there is no way you would ever be that confused, well you never been that drunk!

( Yes, I am insane but how many idiots use the word hankering!?! )
 
Uh oh....no cigars for Timmy!

At least Donald John Trump has been faithful and never sire a child out of wedlock, oh wait!

Donald Trump - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Make sure your cheating bastard of a candidate is better than Bill Clinton and if not then shut the fuck up will you!


He is way better than Bill. Melania or Monica?

Are you serious? It's not even close.

As for morality......bill raped chicks and Hillary covered them up and attacked the victim.

She no longer believes a rape.accuswr has.the right to be believed..so let's go there
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.
All married couples are a package deal. However only one person can actually hold the position.
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.

Everything in this post is.true...Clinton's are a twofer. Hill don't bake no cookies...she's too advanced....lololol
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.
All married couples are a package deal. However only one person can actually hold the position.

And Eleanor taught every democratic woman how to hold that position... ( yes, there was Lesbian meaning behind that one and remember I am inane! )
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.
All married couples are a package deal. However only one person can actually hold the position.


But Clinton was very snobby and harsh towards women who didn't share her ambition.....she's a real bitch.
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.
All married couples are a package deal. However only one person can actually hold the position.

Semantics.

It's common, easily demonstrated knowledge that when Bill was President, Hillary was hugely involved in a way no first lady ever had been. She had a great deal of control. And it's not common for candidate spouses to proclaim, as she did, that they will essentially be an unelected co-president. You're clutching at straws.
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.
All married couples are a package deal. However only one person can actually hold the position.


But Clinton was very snobby and harsh towards women who didn't share her ambition.....she's a real bitch.
Thats no way to talk about your next POTUS. At least she isnt a temperamental mental midget like Drumpf. She has experience and....well she isnt Drumpf.
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.
All married couples are a package deal. However only one person can actually hold the position.

Semantics.

It's common, easily demonstrated knowledge that when Bill was President, Hillary was hugely involved in a way no first lady ever had been. She had a great deal of control. And it's not common for candidate spouses to proclaim, as she did, that they will essentially be an unelected co-president. You're clutching at straws.
All FLOTUS have control. Its what happens when you get married. Your wife practically takes over and makes decisions. Its easier just to let them have their way and wisely pick your battles.
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.
All married couples are a package deal. However only one person can actually hold the position.


But Clinton was very snobby and harsh towards women who didn't share her ambition.....she's a real bitch.
Thats no way to talk about your next POTUS. At least she isnt a temperamental mental midget like Drumpf. She has experience and....well she isnt Drumpf.


Before you say that ask people that worked for her.
 
All FLOTUS have control. Its what happens when you get married. Your wife practically takes over and makes decisions. Its easier just to let them have their way and wisely pick your battles.

Not in the way Hillary did, and you know it. There are plenty of arguments you could make without clinging to intellectual dishonesty. You should try it sometime.
 
I thought Hilary was running not Bill? That would be like calling Melania a skank for her porno shoots.

Meh, not really. Bill n'Hill were often fond of saying that they were a package deal. If memory serves, the phrase "two for the price of one" was used. Everybody with more than two neurons to rub together knows that their marriage is just a political partnership.
All married couples are a package deal. However only one person can actually hold the position.

Semantics.

It's common, easily demonstrated knowledge that when Bill was President, Hillary was hugely involved in a way no first lady ever had been. She had a great deal of control. And it's not common for candidate spouses to proclaim, as she did, that they will essentially be an unelected co-president. You're clutching at straws.

Bill Clinton acknowledge his wife when he was President and if you are too young to remember you should study Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and their close bond and goals... She was the force behind him!
 

Forum List

Back
Top