We're talking about federal law.
A federal law that requires that you show your ID before you can exercise your right.
Your argument was that you should not have to obtain something unnecessary in order to practice one of your RIGHTS.
Why do you not then apply this argument to the purchase of a gun?
Where in the 2nd Amendment guarantees you a purchase of a firearm?
You're avoiding the question. I so very much do
not wonder why.
Your argument was that you should not have to obtain something unnecessary in order to practice one of your RIGHTS.
Why do you not then apply this argument to the purchase of a gun?
No I have answered it ad nauseum.
You have not, and you know it.
Under the 2nd amendment....
You apparently do not understand that the plenary nature of your argument does not depend on any particular protection offered to any given right by the constitution. As such, as far as your argument goes, how the 2nd or any other amendment protects any right is meaningless.
You stated that you should not have to obtain something unnecessary in order to practice one of your RIGHTS.
Why do you not then apply this argument to exercise your right to purchase a gun?