Did 'Pocahontas' post that it's best to wait for the investigation to be complete or did the kunt essentially claim the church was burned by a Trump supporter???????????????OK I get it dannyboys and cereal_killerIt's not a conspiracy theory its fact....look it upClassic false flag...what the left will stoop to to get votes.
Before you start another conspiracy theory - shouldn't you at least wait until the investigation is complete? The OP did not place blame - it just reported the event.
Oh, so you have "credible" proof that it's a "classic false flag"? Can you please share it with us?
Lakhota is asking for equally documented sources to confirm what DB said that
the fire dept has PICTURES of the church before someone else sprayed it.
So yes, it may have to "wait for the investigation" to be complete before
they can publish more in PUBLIC or else it can HARM the investigation.
For legal reasons, the formal documentation may not be available until after it's fully confirmed.
For as we know, unlike the news sources that can post the rumors as long as they don't NAME
anyone, they can get away with that. But if you are going to PROVE the real person and reason,
who did it and why, then to avoid getting sued it has to be FORMALLY ESTABLISHED.
so yes, that takes "waiting for the formal investigation to be completed"
Lakhota does deserve proof of that, even though this isn't required of the rumors that don't name a specific person as the guilty party
YA FUCKING RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!