Violent Rhetoric? How does this Trump Post "lower the temperature"?

[Dante]

Looks like more than a few somebodys, got their buttons pushed.

Simple question set people off:
violent-rhetoric
how-does-this-trump-post-lower-the-temperature

 

[hadit]

Looks like more than a few somebodys, got their buttons pushed.

Simple question set people off:
violent-rhetoric
how-does-this-trump-post-lower-the-temperature

Obvious troll is being obvious.

 

[Dante]

Obvious troll is being obvious.

It's okay, Snowflake


Trump's violent language is noted.

 

[citygator]

Carefully crafted to include only democrats, and ignore violence against Republicans.

Again, carefully crafted to include only democrats and ignore violence against Republicans.

First of all, you need to prove that. Secondly, do the assignment I gave you and tell us how it wasn't violence.

Total BS.

Every president assassinated or shot at was shot at by democrats.

The left is violent, that's clear.

Trump is pumping the violent rhetoric. You wont condemn it because you approve of violence against people who dont support Trump. That is clear. I've shown you how skewed political violence is toward killing and shooting democrats. You just want to talk about attempts on Trump that happen to every president and were all either registered republicans or their family raised them in deep right wing gun culture. The only people being killed for their political positions are left wing democrats.

 

[hadit]

Trump is pumping the violent rhetoric. You wont condemn it because you approve of violence against people who dont support Trump.

And there's the good old foil helmet mind-reading trick again.

That is clear. I've shown you how skewed political violence is toward killing and shooting democrats. You just want to talk about attempts on Trump that happen to every president and were all either registered republicans or their family raised them in deep right wing gun culture. The only people being killed for their political positions are left wing democrats.

Charlie Kirk.

And you continue to ignore the violence on the left, the violent rhetoric from deranged elected democrats, the violent mob behaviors, the attacks on people for simply wearing a red hat, and the list goes on and on. You want to pretend violence against democrats is the only violence going on, that's simple trolling.

 

[Dante]

And there's the good old foil helmet mind-reading trick again.

Charlie Kirk.

And you continue to ignore the violence on the left, the violent rhetoric from deranged elected democrats, the violent mob behaviors, the attacks on people for simply wearing a red hat, and the list goes on and on. You want to pretend violence against democrats is the only violence going on, that's simple trolling.

Violent actor, playing he's peaceful. Got what was coming.

He went out doing the Trump Dance.

good riddance

 

[citygator]

And there's the good old foil helmet mind-reading trick again.

Charlie Kirk.

And you continue to ignore the violence on the left, the violent rhetoric from deranged elected democrats, the violent mob behaviors, the attacks on people for simply wearing a red hat, and the list goes on and on. You want to pretend violence against democrats is the only violence going on, that's simple trolling.

Here is what we CAN agree on... violence is bad... AND only Trump is spewing violent rhetoric as a party leader. You dont see anything like that from Democratic party leaders.

 

[Correll]

Looks like more than a few somebodys, got their buttons pushed.

Simple question set people off:
violent-rhetoric
how-does-this-trump-post-lower-the-temperature

Here teh leftard does the FLEDGLING TACTIC, where he pretends to be ignorant of anything or everything that occurred before this discussion.


ie the context of massive violence from the left and Trump using POLITICAL POWER, to fight his inter-party enemies.


There is no effective response to this tactic. Any attempt to engage the leftard in question, will be ignored and they will just move on to next attack.

Flatworms have more indepth consideration of nuance, than leftards.

 

[citygator]

Here teh leftard does the FLEDGLING TACTIC, where he pretends to be ignorant of anything or everything that occurred before this discussion.


ie the context of massive violence from the left and Trump using POLITICAL POWER, to fight his inter-party enemies.


There is no effective response to this tactic. Any attempt to engage the leftard in question, will be ignored and they will just move on to next attack.

Flatworms have more indepth consideration of nuance, than leftards.

Make it make sense:

 

[Correll]

Make it make sense:

View attachment 1261644

NOte the complete lack of any reference or knowledge of the.... 4? assassination attempts on Trump, or the very recent PRIMARY VICTOR over a "rhino" of Trump's.


The "fledgling" leftard, is pretending to be just a few hours old.

NOthing can make the leftard break character. Any attemp to deal with the leftard, as though they are a person, is wasted.


We can look forward to when such hacks are replaced with actual ai bots. The ai bots, will try to maintain an illusion of human level intelligence.

IN that, they will have a weakness and may mistakenly engage with reality or context, in an attempt to fake being human.

Something a leftard will never do.

 

[citygator]

NOte the complete lack of any reference or knowledge of the.... 4? assassination attempts on Trump, or the very recent PRIMARY VICTOR over a "rhino" of Trump's.


The "fledgling" leftard, is pretending to be just a few hours old.

NOthing can make the leftard break character. Any attemp to deal with the leftard, as though they are a person, is wasted.


We can look forward to when such hacks are replaced with actual ai bots. The ai bots, will try to maintain an illusion of human level intelligence.

IN that, they will have a weakness and may mistakenly engage with reality or context, in an attempt to fake being human.

Something a leftard will never do.

So you cant make it make sense?

 

[Correll]

So you cant make it make sense?

Notice how the leftard refused to engage in any of my points.

Nothing can break that. Any attempt to try to shame the leftard into engaging seriously, or honestly is doomed to failure.

THe leftard has no shame. It is sociopathic.

 

[citygator]

Notice how the leftard refused to engage in any of my points.

Nothing can break that. Any attempt to try to shame the leftard into engaging seriously, or honestly is doomed to failure.

THe leftard has no shame. It is sociopathic.

I asked you to explain how one tweet is worth an indictment and the other is considered no big deal I'll try again....

Make this make sense:

 

[Mac1958]

The division that's in the process of killing us starts at the top. He's been this way his whole life, and he's only getting worse.

He does it every single day. We have never had a President who came within a million miles of this. There is no comparison. Period.

Anyone who denies that is a goddamn liar.

 

[Correll]

I asked you to explain how one tweet is worth an indictment and the other is

The division that's in the process of killing us starts at the top. He's been this way his whole life, and he's only getting worse.

He does it every single day. We have never had a President who came within a million miles of this. Period.

Anyone who denies that is a goddamn liar.

Remeber when your legacy media lied and claimed that Trump said that neo-nazis were "Very fine people".


And instead of calling out the liars, your side lined up to support the lie?

Imagine how much THAT divided us.

Imagine what would have happened, if a significant portion of your side, had the moral courage, to tell the truth and call out the liars.


1. Everyone that did that, would have street cred with the other side, ie cons. We would be willing to listen to you/them, if they had a complaint to make about something.

2. Blacks (and browns), would have seen that Trump was dissing, w.s. and nazis, instead being told that MAGA was W.S.

3. MAGA would have been less pissed off, by that whole event.

4. The legacy media would have been utterly discredited quicker than it was, in reality. Which can only be a good thing. NO one should listen to those assholes anymore.

 

[citygator]

Remeber when your legacy media lied and claimed that Trump said that neo-nazis were "Very fine people".


And instead of calling out the liars, your side lined up to support the lie?

Imagine how much THAT divided us.

Imagine what would have happened, if a significant portion of your side, had the moral courage, to tell the truth and call out the liars.


1. Everyone that did that, would have street cred with the other side, ie cons. We would be willing to listen to you/them, if they had a complaint to make about something.

2. Blacks (and browns), would have seen that Trump was dissing, w.s. and nazis, instead being told that MAGA was W.S.

3. MAGA would have been less pissed off, by that whole event.

4. The legacy media would have been utterly discredited quicker than it was, in reality. Which can only be a good thing. NO one should listen to those assholes anymore.

You're just justifying his violent rhetoric. That's all you are doing.

 

[Correll]

You're just justifying his violent rhetoric. That's all you are doing.

You had a chance to fight back against division. And you choose to support further division.


Would have been the easiest thing in the world, to just tell the truth.

But, it was beyond you.

Even today, you can't do it.

 

[Fang]

The right continues its performative outrage at random unknown twitter users that all read like- bigpubhater123456- posting something.... meanwhile the President of the US is posting imagery of him slaying a RHINO as a warning to people he considers RINOs. Imagery of guns, enemies, and death to make a point. Where is the outrage?

Cricket.. cricket.


View attachment 1261564

The sad truth is there are some Liberals dumb enough to think the picture is real.

 

[citygator]

You had a chance to fight back against division. And you choose to support further division.


Would have been the easiest thing in the world, to just tell the truth.

But, it was beyond you.

Even today, you can't do it.

I spoke out against violent rhetoric by starting this thread. Will you condemn the presidents rhetoric? yes or no?

 

[citygator]

The sad truth is there are some Liberals dumb enough to think the picture is real.

There are republicans dumb enough to think they can distract from the fact Trump posted this divisive and violent post.