Video Clip of a kid with two fathers (yes, that kind)

[glockmail]

So are you a shining example of womanhood and femininity? Should we look to you as the feminine model?

Who's we? You and your poodle?

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Who's we? You and your poodle?

We as in the members of this board, and the world beyond.

 

[glockmail]

We as in the members of this board, and the world beyond.

I wasn't aware that you represented all those people. My, aren't you special!

 

[The ClayTaurus]

I wasn't aware that you represented all those people. My, aren't you special!

Perhaps you could point out where I claimed I did.

 

[glockmail]

Perhaps you could point out where I claimed I did.

You alluded to it in Post #42.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

You alluded to it in Post #42.

Hardly. You made an assumption. An incorrect one.

 

[glockmail]

Hardly. You made an assumption. An incorrect one.

So it is just you and your poodle then?

 

[Said1]

Well. This thread sucks now.

I can prove it too.

And no, I have no 'scientific proof' to offer with respect to my observations, which, btw I do asssert as fact.

Pretentious enough? If not let me know, bad day at the mines.

 

[Kagom]

Well. This thread sucks now.

I can prove it too.

And no, I have no 'scientific proof' to offer with respect to my observations, which, btw I do asssert as fact.

Pretentious enough? If not let me know, bad day at the mines.

I demand scientific evidence regardless!

 

[Said1]

I demand scientific evidence regardless!

Biteth, moi!

 

[Kagom]

Biteth, moi!

But, but, I wanted you to prove your point with science!

You have hurt me deeply, Said1.

 

[Said1]

But, but, I wanted you to prove your point with science!

You have hurt me deeply, Said1.

Ok, you asked for it:0111010001101111001000000111010001101111011100000010000001101001011101000010000001100001011011000110110000100000011011110110011001100110001011000010000001101101011110010010000001100100011011110110011100100000011000110111001001100001011100000111000001100101011001000010000001101111011011100010000001110100011010000110010100100000011001100110110001101111011011110111001000101110001000000101010001100001011011000110101100100000011000010110001001101111011101010111010000100000011110010110111101110101011100100010000001110011011010000110100101110100001000000110110001110101011000110110101100100001

 

[Kagom]

Ok, you asked for it:0111010001101111001000000111010001101111011100000010000001101001011101000010000001100001011011000110110000100000011011110110011001100110001011000010000001101101011110010010000001100100011011110110011100100000011000110111001001100001011100000111000001100101011001000010000001101111011011100010000001110100011010000110010100100000011001100110110001101111011011110111001000101110001000000101010001100001011011000110101100100000011000010110001001101111011101010111010000100000011110010110111101110101011100100010000001110011011010000110100101110100001000000110110001110101011000110110101100100001

How DARE you speak Robotese to me! You goddamn metalback.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

So it is just you and your poodle then?

The sophistication (not to mention originality) is slaying me. Your husband is a lucky man!

 

[glockmail]

The sophistication (not to mention originality) is slaying me. Your husband is a lucky man!

Best to keep it simple with young boys.
:spank3:

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Best to keep it simple with young boys.
:spank3:

Yeah that's probably best... you wouldn't want to be shown up by one.

 

[glockmail]

Yeah that's probably best... you wouldn't want to be shown up by one.

But yet you keep trying, Clitty.:rotflmao:

 

[The ClayTaurus]

ockmail;496442]But yet you keep trying, Clitty.:rotflmao:

Except for you're the one who instigated in this thread. I know it boosts your self esteem to think that I'm obsessed with you, but please don't let it get in the way of reality. You look foolish.

 

[glockmail]

..... You look foolish.

Missed again: http://www.usmessageboard.com/forums/showpost.php?p=493357&postcount=86

Learn how to shoot like a white boy.

 

[mattskramer]

You were the one making tha claim, therefore the burden of proof is yours.

Other claims came before mine. The people who posted the following assumptions must establish the burden of proving their statements.

Post number 2 was before my post. It says No YouTube from work - but if that's a vid showing a boy living with/influenced by two Gay men, it's a VERY sad story. They are likely causing that boy irreparable harm.

Post number 6 says Friends & family are nice, but only a female in the ROLE of a mother can provide a child with the kind of influence against which he/she molds his/her character. Same applies to children of divorced parents

Where is the scientific basis for their comments?