Verdict reached in Karmelo murder trial

So, what was the justification for Caysen Allison, the hispanic kid was not armed either. What was the justification for him bringing a knife to school, since I keep hearing that Karmelo shouldn't have had one at a school event.
To maybe help you a bit on that - Ramiriz, the Hispanic kid killed, was known on the scool campus as a kid who liked to fight and had a group that followed him videoing those fights. Ramirez had alredy challenged Allison and confronted him in a scjhool restroom with 4 of his followers! It was being videod by Ramiriez's buddies, Ramirez took the first swing and was tha attacker. Allison had FIVE opponents there in that bathroom! He pulled out a small knife and defended himself! His sentence may well be overturned as the judge refused to allow the jury to consider self defense! NO blows were struck against Anthony!!! NONE that arose to the possibility of bodily injury or harm! The judge in the Anthony case did tell the jury the 'self defense finding' was available and explained it all to them! The jury found 'Anthony guilty' but his parents and peers should also have been on trial there for they created that world for him!!!!
 
And yet I've cited many cases here - Allison, Reeves, Chow, Rittenhouse - where deadly force was used far beyond what the situation justified.




One was white. The other was black
Only real difference.
Allison could have easily forced his way past Ramirez and gotten out. In fact, that's exactly what he did after the stabbing.

Allison got 10 years. He's paying the price for his use of force. Personally i don't think anyone should have to go to jail for killing someone in the heat of the moment, if you've been randomly attacked. As for Chow, he got off because of dumb SC laws. Rittenhouse got off because his defense succesfully made the argument that Rosebaum tried to take Rittenhouse's rifle from him, which constituted an imminent threat of death, if he were then to turn around use it against him. This along with Rosebaum making death threats sealed the case.

A funny thing happens once you stab the subject of whatever is preventing you from leaving a situation. It's no longer a hinderance.


Allison was certainly an "antagonizer". He had boasted for days about how he was going to put Ramirez in the hospital.

I would argue, on balance, Allison was far worse. But again. White privilege.

And then he was confronted by Ramirez, and it was then that Allison said he didn't want to fight and that's when Ramirez punched him and started fighting. Which bit of evidence do you suppose is more relevant to a jury? Allison talking smack about Ramirez with his friends or the actual encounter with Ramirez where he attempted to deescalate. Is that your definition of "antagonizing?" 🤷‍♀️
 
To maybe help you a bit on that - Ramiriz, the Hispanic kid killed, was known on the scool campus as a kid who liked to fight and had a group that followed him videoing those fights. Ramirez had alredy challenged Allison and confronted him in a scjhool restroom with 4 of his followers! It was being videod by Ramiriez's buddies, Ramirez took the first swing and was tha attacker. Allison had FIVE opponents there in that bathroom! He pulled out a small knife and defended himself! His sentence may well be overturned as the judge refused to allow the jury to consider self defense! NO blows were struck against Anthony!!! NONE that arose to the possibility of bodily injury or harm! The judge in the Anthony case did tell the jury the 'self defense finding' was available and explained it all to them! The jury found 'Anthony guilty' but his parents and peers should also have been on trial there for they created that world for him!!!!
That bit of barely literate rambling aside, Allison was the one who went around texting his friends about how he was going to put Ramirez "in the Hospital" and said he "wanted to get a gun".

Oh, yeah, and he stabbed Ramirez multiple times, not just once to get a bully off of him.
 
And then he was confronted by Ramirez, and it was then that Allison said he didn't want to fight and that's when Ramirez punched him and started fighting. Which bit of evidence do you suppose is more relevant to a jury? Allison talking smack about Ramirez with his friends or the actual encounter with Ramirez where he attempted to deescalate. Is that your definition of "antagonizing?"

Um, yeah, he was talking smack about how he was going to "put him in the hospital".

Some of his friends even tried to talk him down from it.

But again

WHITE PRIVILEGE!!!
 
Rittenhouse got off because his defense succesfully made the argument that Rosebaum tried to take Rittenhouse's rifle from him, which constituted an imminent threat of death, if he were then to turn around use it against him. This along with Rosebaum making death threats sealed the case.

Rittenhouse got off because the judge rigged the case in his favor, and because the white folks in Kenosha wanted to send a big F-U to the protestors.

Seriously, Kenosha is the biggest white trash dump in Wisconsin.
 
So, what was the justification for Caysen Allison, the hispanic kid was not armed either. What was the justification for him bringing a knife to school, since I keep hearing that Karmelo shouldn't have had one at a school event.

According to witness testimony, Ramirez had previously pulled a gun on Allison during a prom after party. Allison carried the knife because he feared for his life after that.
 
Rittenhouse got off because the judge rigged the case in his favor, and because the white folks in Kenosha wanted to send a big F-U to the protestors.

Seriously, Kenosha is the biggest white trash dump in Wisconsin.

Ok prove it 🤷‍♀️

Is there a current case against the Judge?
 
Um, yeah, he was talking smack about how he was going to "put him in the hospital".

Some of his friends even tried to talk him down from it.

But again

WHITE PRIVILEGE!!!

Yeah, when someone pulls a gun on you prior, you're thinking up ways to take him out before he takes you out. Not uncommon. This still isn't relevant to the stabbing though. Allison didn't follow and corner Ramirez in a bathroom, didn't want to fight when the encounter happened and didn't throw the first punch. All things a jury takes into account. That's on top of the fact that Ramirez was also known as the campus bully, which i'm sure endured him further to the jurors.
 
From what?

I've already discounted anything from this farce of a trial.
so you dont even believe the witness for the defense but believe a vague statement from an unnamed source??

that would make you a racist troll,,

and a pervert that sleeps with a blowup chinese made sex doll,,
 
I think getting into a fight over who got to stand in a tent is a bit petty.

I guess Metcalf won't be a bully Jock for... well, never.

Again, you have it backwards.

Dawn White

@DawnWhiteNews
·
Jun 6


A new witness, a 16-year-old boy, is testifying.Prosecutor Bill Wirskye: “When you tell him [Karmelo Anthony] to leave, what does he do?”Witness “He doesn’t leave. He gets angry and tries to provoke us, saying, ‘Make me leave.’”
@CBSNewsTexas


Dawn White

@DawnWhiteNews


Prosecutor Bill Wirskye: “Was Austin or Karmelo instigating?”Witness “Yes, Karmelo.”Prosecutor Bill Wirskye: “What happens next?”Witness “Austin tries to force him out because we didn’t have any other choice.





Dawn White

@DawnWhiteNews
·
Jun 6


An teen, 17, is testifying. The prosecutor asked him, “Was there any reason you saw for Karmelo Anthony to stab Austin Metcalf?” Witness: “No.” Prosecutor: “Was Karmelo Anthony acting in self-defense?” Witness “No, that’s lethal force against non-lethal force.”
@CBSNewsTexas
 
I just recently watched some white kid doing interviews after the Karmelo Anthony case. He walked up to a black guy asking for his thoughts on the verdict. The black dude gave his nonsensical opinion and then began insulting the interviewer and egging him into a fight for literally no reason. All the while the interviewer had barely said anything, he was just allowing him to give his answer and speak. This was probably the type of behavior Metcalf and his friends witnessed when Anthony jumped into their tent and wouldn't leave. This is why so many blacks suddenly end up arrested, in jail or dead.
 

To maybe help you a bit on that - Ramiriz, the Hispanic kid killed, was known on the scool campus as a kid who liked to fight and had a group that followed him videoing those fights. Ramirez had alredy challenged Allison and confronted him in a scjhool restroom with 4 of his followers! It was being videod by Ramiriez's buddies, Ramirez took the first swing and was tha attacker. Allison had FIVE opponents there in that bathroom! He pulled out a small knife and defended himself! His sentence may well be overturned as the judge refused to allow the jury to consider self defense! NO blows were struck against Anthony!!! NONE that arose to the possibility of bodily injury or harm! The judge in the Anthony case did tell the jury the 'self defense finding' was available and explained it all to them! The jury found 'Anthony guilty' but his parents and peers should also have been on trial there for they created that world for him!!!!
See now you are trying to justify this kid having a knife in school and using it to murder another kid. It's amazing how when it comes to someone white you will justify them using a knife or gun in what you call a fist fight. We heard over and over as to why Karmelo had a knife at a school event and now you are trying to justify Allison having a knife on school grounds when you know it is not allowed. Now it was a small knife and no he wasn't fighting 5 kids, also the Metcalf brothers were known as bullies as well, but for some reason folks want to ignore that.
 
15th post
Ok prove it 🤷‍♀️

Is there a current case against the Judge?

Okay, Judge Senile

1) Refused to allow the people Rittenhouse shot to be called "victims"
2) Allowed the defense to call them "rioters" and "looters" (even though there was no evidence any of them were looting)
3) Refused to allow the prosecution to admit the tape of Rittenhouse fantasizing about shooting a black man leaving a CVS
4) refused to allow pictures of Rittenhouse partying with the Racist Proud Boys.
5) refused to allow evidence that Rittenhouse had beaten up a 14 year old girl
6) Told the jury to stand up and applaud a defense witness.
7) Openly berated prosecutors in court.
8) seated a mostly white jury. (even though 30% of the population of Kenosha county are people of color
 
Sure you do, you don't ever see right wingers on this forum whining about white criminals, but you damn sure have plenty to say about the black and hispanic ones.

Don't play retard. There have been a few time you have tried to show how conservatives are teh same as leftards, by posting some article about white criminals.


And conservatives DON'T rush to defend them. IF the reports contain details and it looks like the white criminal is a piece of shit, then the conservatives are like, "YEah, execute the subhuman animal".


And the thread dies for lack of discussion.

But, when the criminal is black or brown, then the leftards rush to defend them, and then you have shit to discuss, ie why the **** the leftards are on the side of the sub humans and want to destroy our nation.
 
Don't play retard. There have been a few time you have tried to show how conservatives are teh same as leftards, by posting some article about white criminals.


And conservatives DON'T rush to defend them. IF the reports contain details and it looks like the white criminal is a piece of shit, then the conservatives are like, "YEah, execute the subhuman animal".

Unless it's Kyle Rittenhouse
Or George Zimmerman
Or Rickie Chow (okay, he was Asian, but that's close enough these days)
Or Caysen Allison
Or Curtis Reeves
Or Darren Wilson
Or Timothy Loehmann
Or Derek Chauvin
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom