MarcATL
Diamond Member
- Aug 12, 2009
- 48,389
- 27,033
- 2,605
Check my posts.So deadly force is kosher if a Brother pushes a White guy in the WalMart parking lot ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Check my posts.So deadly force is kosher if a Brother pushes a White guy in the WalMart parking lot ?
You’re mixed up. It’s the Islamists who think that.I wonder if they think there are 72 virgins waiting for them when they go tits up.
Still, worse for one than the other. One has NO life, and the other has a chance at freedom in his 40s.
No, you’re ******* stupid. You don’t create shit and then said you fear for your life.And there you have it folks, "I'm white and I say so" defense sprinkled w/good ole white American violence to top it off.
![]()
Of course it's reasonable, if a group of very large white football players aggressively approaches a small black boy, it's total fear in the air.You need to apply the reasonable standard. Would a REASONABLE person fear for his life?
NO.
No. The standard is reasonable fear. The codicil is the legal and factual doctrine in Texas that you can't start a fight, kill the guy, and claim self defense.His argument is bullshit.
I hope you’re not excusing the killer. HE is the one who turned a petty argument into a murder.Pretty much. What should have been a petty situation turned into something awful
One life was lost. The other gets three hots and a cot.The entire thing is unfortunate. Two young lives lost or ruined.
I understand.I do not believe that he created that scenario.
However, I understand that's what was presented as the truth.
So if someone refuses to leave your property and said you are a threat, that should be accepted as truth?I do not believe that he created that scenario.
However, I understand that's what was presented as the truth.
I hope you’re not excusing the killer. HE is the one who turned a petty argument into a murder.
Who's property was it in this case?So if someone refuses to leave your property and said you are a threat, that should be accepted as truth?
But you’re equating the two as if they both suffered the same.No I'm not. I said the entire thing is unfortunate.
But you’re equating the two as if they both suffered the same.
Any suffering by the killer is the killer’s own fault.
Again, the takeaway in this tragedy should be "keep your hands to yourself."I understand.
This is also why you don't start fights with old guys in Texas. We will just kill you and call our lawyer.![]()
I don’t care which state. If someone trespasses on my property and refuses to leave, I’ll exterminate the vermin and I don’t care if that person fights back.No. The standard is reasonable fear. The codicil is the legal and factual doctrine in Texas that you can't start a fight, kill the guy, and claim self defense.
It happens here, a lot. We are a state full of absolute assholes. God made Texas to train the Faithful after all.
It was not private property. That case would never go to trial because the defense would have immediately pled out. Surprised they did not here.So if someone refuses to leave your property and said you are a threat, that should be accepted as truth?
So let’s say I’m standing on the corner in a poor, urban city and a group of black youths are walking down the street towards me - and looking at me. I am in fear of my life. Can I take out my gun and blow them all to smithereens?Of course it's reasonable, if a group of very large white football players aggressively approaches a small black boy, it's total fear in the air.
I would accept that as a maxim.Again, the takeaway in this tragedy should be keep your hands to yourself.
It will serve everybody well going forward. Agree?
No property in this case. This was the sidelines of a sport meet- track I think.I don’t care which state. If someone trespasses on my property and refuses to leave, I’ll exterminate the vermin and I don’t care if that person fights back.