Van Jones' Crime:

[Liability]

Personally insulting someone may make you feel better, but it doesn't help you win an argument. In fact, if you use such a tactic and are proven wrong, it makes you look like a moron.

I insulted you? OH poor boo-boo. I realize that offends you, you hypocritcial gasbag. I mean all you did was to stupidly and baselessly argue that I was somehow "unAmerican." Fuck off. You hypocrites deserve no quarter.



Completely irrelevant since I had not ever said, suggested or implied that the supporters should be barred from expressing their insipid "feelings." It's not my fault that you cannot read or comprehend uncomplicated English sentences, you moron.



Pretty weak. The last one was in the 3rd Circuit. Libs widely expected something new. They didn't get it of course. The SCOTUS DID reject the appeal from the 3rd Circuit determination. Prior to the 3rd Circuit, of course, the case had already run its course through the State appeals process. I guess you just missed ALL the news.



Wow. That's a very insightful revelation. Thanks for sharing it.

And it certainly doesn't make it right to try to stop them from exercising their FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT to speak out for what they feel is right.

Good information. And if you stumble upon anybody who HAS argued that those morons shouldn't have freedom of speech to make their ignorant claims, let us all know. So far, however, the closest you've come seems to be to be your stupid, incoherent and erroneous effort to make that allegation against me.

[Insipid but hypocritical blather about etiquette snipped]

Be that as it may...

The point of this entire conversation was NOT whether Mr Mumia is guilty or innocent. As I stated, I personally do not believe that Mr Mumia is innocent.

The Point was that people were arguing that the fact that Van Jones supported a re-trial for Mr Mumia, is a REASON HE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BE APPOINTED TO PUBLIC OFFICE.

Trying to discriminate against Mr Jones by disqualifying him for eligibility for a job based on his opinion of Mr Mumia's case IS an attempt at denial of MR JONES' first amendment rights. Especially since that opinion has nothing to do with the job in question.

Oh please!

When you take into account that he signed a 9/11 Troofer petition and the racist shit-ass way he categorizes whites as the polluters and the fact that he was getting a gig as a Presidential "Czar" for green jobs WHILE being an avowed communist and then toss in his sub-stupid support of Mumia, a pattern of who and what he is emerges. And that pattern is pretty damn clear. The man is a nutjob.

He CLEARLY didn't get vetted by the Administration (they say he never filled out his 67 page questionnaire -- uhm huh -- so why did they permit that?). The only alternative to him not having gotten vetted is that he DID get vetted and the Obama Administration simply didn't CARE about the nutjobs views.

And stop deluding yourself.

Nutjob views are PERFECTLY proper bases for a decision NOT to accept someone as a spokesman for a government entity.

 

[manu1959]

He called Republicans assholes. A lot of US agree with this.

Bush called a Times reporter a major asshole and never apologized. Cheney told Leahy in the Senate to go fuck himself. The right thought this was so manly. I guess whites can say shit a black can't?

He signed a petition that basically was saying they weren't completely happy with the 9-11 investigation - Duh?

Glenn ( as smart as a fly on shit) Beck didn't start this. He jumped on the bandwagon after a rather wealthy oil man started the attack on Van Jones. Too much of the green job stuff isn't good for big oil.

The current RNC is morally corrupt and empty of any plans except to attack Obama and give more tax cuts to the rich.

They do come up with some really nice patriotic sounding names for all their little attack groups, howerver.

van jones quit......he works for soros now.....

 

[Darkwind]

What a load of regurgitated, apologist tripe.

You of course couldn't be troubled to PROVE any of these assertions could you? Like, starting with the "wealthy oil man" who "started" the "attack" on Jones? Who is it? Where's your evidence?

If you weren't such an idiot you would know that "big oil" is ALL OVER this green crap. "Big oil" stands to make hundreds of billions of dollars off it!

Meanwhile, the White House has said they messed up, didn't "scrub" Van Jones. Scrub? As in, scrubbing all the bad stuff off the internet? What does it mean? And doesn't it trouble you?

Here's Jones' radical resume:

1. One of the founders and current board member of Apollo Alliance
2. Ardent black separatist/black nationalist. VAN JONES: "The white polluters and the white environmentalists are essentially steering poison into the people of colored communities." What?
3. Founder of Color of Change, which includes Bay Area PoliceWatch, a group devoted to "protect[ing] the community from police misconduct"
4. One of the founders of STORM (Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement) a communist radical group which held study groups on the theories of Marx and Lenin and dreamed of a multiracial socialist utopia. They protested police brutality and got arrested for crashing through police barricades.
5. Founder of the Ella Baker Center which is STORM re-imagined, with many of the same board members
6. Was arrested in the 1993 Rodney King riots in LA
7. Was arrested in the 1999 WTO riots in Seattle
8. Ardent supporter of convicted cop killer and communist Mumia Abu-Jamal. (AKA Wesley Cook)

He didn't get into the "green" movement until 2005. How convenient. What a way to mainstream a marxist/racist/black seperatist/revolutionary.

And that's just the start. This is a guy you want working shoulder to shoulder with the President of the United States?

He committed no "crime" and no one's alleged he has. That's just more far-left spin which you have so faithfully regurgitated here. He exercised his free speech rights, but the WH failed to scrub them so we wouldn't find them.

Why again, would they need to scrub anyone? And why are you okay with it?

I was going to type out a reply, but I'll just use this one. It is concise and blows the OP right out of the water...

 

[Ravi]

I insulted you? OH poor boo-boo. I realize that offends you, you hypocritcial gasbag. I mean all you did was to stupidly and baselessly argue that I was somehow "unAmerican." Fuck off. You hypocrites deserve no quarter.



Completely irrelevant since I had not ever said, suggested or implied that the supporters should be barred from expressing their insipid "feelings." It's not my fault that you cannot read or comprehend uncomplicated English sentences, you moron.



Pretty weak. The last one was in the 3rd Circuit. Libs widely expected something new. They didn't get it of course. The SCOTUS DID reject the appeal from the 3rd Circuit determination. Prior to the 3rd Circuit, of course, the case had already run its course through the State appeals process. I guess you just missed ALL the news.



Wow. That's a very insightful revelation. Thanks for sharing it.



Good information. And if you stumble upon anybody who HAS argued that those morons shouldn't have freedom of speech to make their ignorant claims, let us all know. So far, however, the closest you've come seems to be to be your stupid, incoherent and erroneous effort to make that allegation against me.

[Insipid but hypocritical blather about etiquette snipped]

Be that as it may...

The point of this entire conversation was NOT whether Mr Mumia is guilty or innocent. As I stated, I personally do not believe that Mr Mumia is innocent.

The Point was that people were arguing that the fact that Van Jones supported a re-trial for Mr Mumia, is a REASON HE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BE APPOINTED TO PUBLIC OFFICE.

Trying to discriminate against Mr Jones by disqualifying him for eligibility for a job based on his opinion of Mr Mumia's case IS an attempt at denial of MR JONES' first amendment rights. Especially since that opinion has nothing to do with the job in question.

Oh please!

When you take into account that he signed a 9/11 Troofer petition and the racist shit-ass way he categorizes whites as the polluters and the fact that he was getting a gig as a Presidential "Czar" for green jobs WHILE being an avowed communist and then toss in his sub-stupid support of Mumia, a pattern of who and what he is emerges. And that pattern is pretty damn clear. The man is a nutjob.

He CLEARLY didn't get vetted by the Administration (they say he never filled out his 67 page questionnaire -- uhm huh -- so why di they permit that?). The only alternative to him not having gotten vetted is that he DID get vetted and the Obama Administration simply didn't CARE about the nutjobs views.

And stop deluding yourself.

Nutjob views are PERFECTLY proper bases for a decision NOT to accept someone as a spokesman for a government entity.

3/4 of the Republicans in office and their staffers are some combination of birthers, troofers, and deathers that allow religious leaders to dictate their thoughts. Nutjobs. So your point is invalid. But it is noted that you are yet another person that embraces communistic ideals while pretending to decry them.

 

[WillowTree]

He called Republicans assholes. A lot of US agree with this.

Bush called a Times reporter a major asshole and never apologized. Cheney told Leahy in the Senate to go fuck himself. The right thought this was so manly. I guess whites can say shit a black can't?

He signed a petition that basically was saying they weren't completely happy with the 9-11 investigation - Duh?

Glenn ( as smart as a fly on shit) Beck didn't start this. He jumped on the bandwagon after a rather wealthy oil man started the attack on Van Jones. Too much of the green job stuff isn't good for big oil.

The current RNC is morally corrupt and empty of any plans except to attack Obama and give more tax cuts to the rich.

They do come up with some really nice patriotic sounding names for all their little attack groups, howerver.

van jones quit......he works for soros now.....

that's the same guy barry works for innit?

 

[Roxiebell]

He called Republicans assholes. A lot of US agree with this.

See my correction below.

He said Bush caused 9/11. A lot of US agree with this.

A lot of you would know an A-Hole when you see one since look at one in the mirror each day.

9/11 Terrorists planned, with impunity, the attack for 2 1/2 or more years, and MOSTof that time was under the Clinton administration.

 

[Liability]

[Insipid but hypocritical blather about etiquette snipped]

Be that as it may...

The point of this entire conversation was NOT whether Mr Mumia is guilty or innocent. As I stated, I personally do not believe that Mr Mumia is innocent.

The Point was that people were arguing that the fact that Van Jones supported a re-trial for Mr Mumia, is a REASON HE SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BE APPOINTED TO PUBLIC OFFICE.

Trying to discriminate against Mr Jones by disqualifying him for eligibility for a job based on his opinion of Mr Mumia's case IS an attempt at denial of MR JONES' first amendment rights. Especially since that opinion has nothing to do with the job in question.

Oh please!

When you take into account that he signed a 9/11 Troofer petition and the racist shit-ass way he categorizes whites as the polluters and the fact that he was getting a gig as a Presidential "Czar" for green jobs WHILE being an avowed communist and then toss in his sub-stupid support of Mumia, a pattern of who and what he is emerges. And that pattern is pretty damn clear. The man is a nutjob.

He CLEARLY didn't get vetted by the Administration (they say he never filled out his 67 page questionnaire -- uhm huh -- so why di they permit that?). The only alternative to him not having gotten vetted is that he DID get vetted and the Obama Administration simply didn't CARE about the nutjobs views.

And stop deluding yourself.

Nutjob views are PERFECTLY proper bases for a decision NOT to accept someone as a spokesman for a government entity.

3/4 of the Republicans in office and their staffers are some combination of birthers, troofers, and deathers that allow religious leaders to dictate their thoughts. Nutjobs. So your point is invalid. But it is noted that you are yet another person that embraces communistic ideals while pretending to decry them.

Sure, Ravi. I'm SURE --absolutely CERTAIN -- you could back up your made-up figure with something concrete and verifiable. No doubt about it. For, as all who read your posts know full well, you have JUST that much credibility. {Is there any chance that imbecile-Ravi gets sarcasm?}

And it should be fuirther noted that nothing I said is ANY way demonstrates anything whatsoever even tangentially close to embracing communism. But, nothing like facts, honesty or integrity would ever stand in your way, you lowlife mutt.

 

[GHook93]

He called Republicans assholes. A lot of US agree with this.

Bush called a Times reporter a major asshole and never apologized. Cheney told Leahy in the Senate to go fuck himself. The right thought this was so manly. I guess whites can say shit a black can't?

This was not a crime true, but duh he wasn't charged with any crimes. He was fired, YES FIRED, from his job!

He signed a petition that basically was saying they weren't completely happy with the 9-11 investigation - Duh?

What a disingenious way to put it. He signed a petition stating the US government had a role in 9/11! No public official 9/11 truther has any credibility or mental capacity to hold their position!

Glenn ( as smart as a fly on shit) Beck didn't start this. He jumped on the bandwagon after a rather wealthy oil man started the attack on Van Jones. Too much of the green job stuff isn't good for big oil.

Provide proof to your damning claim. Because like always, the Worlddailynet broke this important story, as they did with Rev Wright!


I love how you leave out that Van Jones, unlike Obama, has known radical communist and anti-government ties! He has no business leading even a boyscout pack!

 

[Vast LWC]

Oh please!

When you take into account that he signed a 9/11 Troofer petition and the racist shit-ass way he categorizes whites as the polluters and the fact that he was getting a gig as a Presidential "Czar" for green jobs WHILE being an avowed communist and then toss in his sub-stupid support of Mumia, a pattern of who and what he is emerges. And that pattern is pretty damn clear. The man is a nutjob.

He CLEARLY didn't get vetted by the Administration (they say he never filled out his 67 page questionnaire -- uhm huh -- so why did they permit that?). The only alternative to him not having gotten vetted is that he DID get vetted and the Obama Administration simply didn't CARE about the nutjobs views.

And stop deluding yourself.

Nutjob views are PERFECTLY proper bases for a decision NOT to accept someone as a spokesman for a government entity.

While your opinion is an interesting one, it is just that, your opinion.

Personally, I'd trust an admitted communist over a lying, drug addict, cult member, like Glenn Beck, any day.

You talk about questionable Van Jones "questionable" background, and get your information from a man that has a background more questionable than 99.99% of the populace. He's a DRUG ADDICT.

And Glenn beck calls Democrats a lot worse than "Assholes" every single day, yet you seem to think he's a stand up guy, don't you?

 

[Vast LWC]

And, for that matter, Rush Limgbaugh is ALSO a drug addict!

I sense a theme here.

 

[BigSteve]

Piss and moan about Van Jones all you want.

The piece of shit is gone, and that's what matters...

 

[Vast LWC]

Cool, and now, since Glenn Beck obviously has a big effect on a whole lot of people in this country, probably more than Van Jones, I think it's time we all talked about his background for a while.

For instance, during all that time as a drug addict, did he ever orally pleasure a man in return for drugs?

Because some say he did.

 

[Liability]

And, for that matter, Rush Limgbaugh is ALSO a drug addict!

I sense a theme here.

Typical dishonesty from a libbie. Nothing better is really to be expected from most libbies.

In reality, Rush apparently did have a drug abuse problem. It stemmed from serious pain issues and from, consequentially, prescribed medication; but in the boundlessly sympathetic heart of many of today's endlessly hypocritical liberoidals, like Trashed LWC, there, "sympathy" is reserved for anybody but a person with whom they disagree politically.

 

[Liability]

Oh please!

When you take into account that he signed a 9/11 Troofer petition and the racist shit-ass way he categorizes whites as the polluters and the fact that he was getting a gig as a Presidential "Czar" for green jobs WHILE being an avowed communist and then toss in his sub-stupid support of Mumia, a pattern of who and what he is emerges. And that pattern is pretty damn clear. The man is a nutjob.

He CLEARLY didn't get vetted by the Administration (they say he never filled out his 67 page questionnaire -- uhm huh -- so why did they permit that?). The only alternative to him not having gotten vetted is that he DID get vetted and the Obama Administration simply didn't CARE about the nutjobs views.

And stop deluding yourself.

Nutjob views are PERFECTLY proper bases for a decision NOT to accept someone as a spokesman for a government entity.

While your opinion is an interesting one, it is just that, your opinion.

Personally, I'd trust an admitted communist over a lying, drug addict, cult member, like Glenn Beck, any day.

You talk about questionable Van Jones "questionable" background, and get your information from a man that has a background more questionable than 99.99% of the populace. He's a DRUG ADDICT.

And Glenn beck calls Democrats a lot worse than "Assholes" every single day, yet you seem to think he's a stand up guy, don't you?

The old expression applies to you, but you are far too simplistic to recognize it:

When you ASSume, you make an ASS of U, not me.

I have seen not one full "show" of Glen Beck's, ever; and only a fragmentary portions of a couple of his shows.

In any event, Beck is not the issue. He does not get appointed by the President to "serve" the United States of America. The knucklehead racist assbite Van Jones DID get that nod from President Obama.

 

[GHook93]

And, for that matter, Rush Limgbaugh is ALSO a drug addict!

I sense a theme here.

Is Rush an unelected official to the Federal government? No, so you apples to elephants comparison is Bull shit! Many liberals in hollywood are addicts, but they are not public officials, so let them do their craft!

 

[Meister]

Cool, and now, since Glenn Beck obviously has a big effect on a whole lot of people in this country, probably more than Van Jones, I think it's time we all talked about his background for a while.

For instance, during all that time as a drug addict, did he ever orally pleasure a man in return for drugs?

Because some say he did.

Did you orally pleasure Obama? Because some say you did.

 

[Avatar4321]

Cool, and now, since Glenn Beck obviously has a big effect on a whole lot of people in this country, probably more than Van Jones, I think it's time we all talked about his background for a while.

For instance, during all that time as a drug addict, did he ever orally pleasure a man in return for drugs?

Because some say he did.

His background is pretty much on full display already. He points it all himself all the time. Youd know that if you paid any attention.

And the only one who says he did that is you, and you know what, if he did would that mean he is any less wrong? Your problem is you are so concerned with destroying him that you are ignoring what he says and does.

 

[jeffrockit]

I would like to read an honest answer from the libs on here.....turn Van Jones affiliation around for a minute. If he were a Republican or a Conservative with the same background, how would you feel about him. Blind partisanship on either side makes some people support some truly bad people just as long as they are on their side.
The politicians love the fact that we are split between the parties because there is strength in numbers and divided we don't have the numbers to vote out the corrupt ones (which seems to be very many).

 

[ba1614]

Oh please!

When you take into account that he signed a 9/11 Troofer petition and the racist shit-ass way he categorizes whites as the polluters and the fact that he was getting a gig as a Presidential "Czar" for green jobs WHILE being an avowed communist and then toss in his sub-stupid support of Mumia, a pattern of who and what he is emerges. And that pattern is pretty damn clear. The man is a nutjob.

He CLEARLY didn't get vetted by the Administration (they say he never filled out his 67 page questionnaire -- uhm huh -- so why did they permit that?). The only alternative to him not having gotten vetted is that he DID get vetted and the Obama Administration simply didn't CARE about the nutjobs views.

And stop deluding yourself.

Nutjob views are PERFECTLY proper bases for a decision NOT to accept someone as a spokesman for a government entity.

While your opinion is an interesting one, it is just that, your opinion.

Personally, I'd trust an admitted communist over a lying, drug addict, cult member, like Glenn Beck, any day.

You talk about questionable Van Jones "questionable" background, and get your information from a man that has a background more questionable than 99.99% of the populace. He's a DRUG ADDICT.

And Glenn beck calls Democrats a lot worse than "Assholes" every single day, yet you seem to think he's a stand up guy, don't you?

Lets see, Beck simply asked some questions, and rather than answer them, Jones quit.
So lets attack Beck, ya that's it! lol typical.