Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than The Virus
- Thread starter easyt65
- Start date
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,359
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #42
There are safety protocols and required testing for a reason.
This pandemic was a 'Test Of The National Pandemic Response Capability' (tongue-and-cheek, as there is no such official thing).
Attempt and Ability To Mobilize Private Pharmaceudical Companies And Govt / Military / Private research labs / organizations:
- Grade A
Allowing Big Pharma to Throw Safety Protocols & Required Tests Out The Window In An Effort To Save Lives As Fast As Possible:
- F
Giving Immunity To Big Pharma Who Threw Safety Protocols & Required Tests Out The Window:
- F
Great, the Govt moved quickly to save lives to counter the 'biological attack' from the ChiComs...but we STILL Don't know all the effects of COVID, COVID Variants, and Long Haul COVID.
Much like with the seasonal flu, a 'best guess' approach in creating / picking a vaccine, and putting it out / mandating it was taken.
- How can you create a vaccine for something you don't fully understand?
The 'cure' / 'vaccine' wasn't very different - due to skipping many stages, safety protocols, and testing Big Pharma and scientists really didn't know what they had created yet put it out and sold it as a 'vaccine' that wod prevent people from catching COVID or that wod lesson it's effects.
- We now know the vaccines and boosters (many of which were just another round of the same drugs) did NOTHING to prevent anyone from catching COVID whe putting people at risk for some really nasty side effects - from lung and heart damage, strokes,or just falling over dead.
This was an 'experimental drug' in every sense of the definition, and Big Pharma knew it, which is why they demanded prote turn from liability after skipping the legally required tests. WE were the test subjects.
In my mind, partial, this entire govt process with mandate at the end was / is almost no different from the govt conducting tests on unaware military members by injecting them with LSD & uranium past. The only difference in this case was their effort was an attempt to rapidly counter a ChiCom 'WMD'...(and / or to test the govt's ability to react to such enemy attacks in the future).
We already had drugs we KNEW were effective against COVID..SO WHY DID THE US GOVT OPPOSE THEIR USE...REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THEY WORKED, AND ATTACKED ANYONE (USING THE MEDIA TO HELP) WHO SUGGESTED USING THESE OTHER MEDICINES?
(I don't want to get 'conspiratorial' or be labeled a 'Conspiracy Theorist', BUT...
In the midst of a pandemic in which millions are dying why would you reject and demonize ANY already approved medication that proved itself to be even somewhat effective against the virus while you are trying to create a new vaccine?
Why would you do so to protect a new drug that skipped required safety protocols, purposely did not research possible harmful side effects, and was not being tested?
Big Pharma demanding immunity should have set off 'alarm bells'...
...but A LOT of politicians were heavily invested in these Big Pharma companies. So why not legislate / pressuring the squashing of already existing drugs that were proven safe and cod / did help while mandating Americans take multiple doses and boosters of the new drug made by the company you're invested in and stand to make a lot of money from, especially when their profits ate protected from liability law suits?!
It only stands to reason at least SOME of those in charge making these decisions already knew these things....
(I am betting, like with most decisions made by politicians in DC, more could be exposed simy by applying that old adage - 'Flow The Money'.)
This pandemic was a 'Test Of The National Pandemic Response Capability' (tongue-and-cheek, as there is no such official thing).
Attempt and Ability To Mobilize Private Pharmaceudical Companies And Govt / Military / Private research labs / organizations:
- Grade A
Allowing Big Pharma to Throw Safety Protocols & Required Tests Out The Window In An Effort To Save Lives As Fast As Possible:
- F
Giving Immunity To Big Pharma Who Threw Safety Protocols & Required Tests Out The Window:
- F
Great, the Govt moved quickly to save lives to counter the 'biological attack' from the ChiComs...but we STILL Don't know all the effects of COVID, COVID Variants, and Long Haul COVID.
Much like with the seasonal flu, a 'best guess' approach in creating / picking a vaccine, and putting it out / mandating it was taken.
- How can you create a vaccine for something you don't fully understand?
The 'cure' / 'vaccine' wasn't very different - due to skipping many stages, safety protocols, and testing Big Pharma and scientists really didn't know what they had created yet put it out and sold it as a 'vaccine' that wod prevent people from catching COVID or that wod lesson it's effects.
- We now know the vaccines and boosters (many of which were just another round of the same drugs) did NOTHING to prevent anyone from catching COVID whe putting people at risk for some really nasty side effects - from lung and heart damage, strokes,or just falling over dead.
This was an 'experimental drug' in every sense of the definition, and Big Pharma knew it, which is why they demanded prote turn from liability after skipping the legally required tests. WE were the test subjects.
In my mind, partial, this entire govt process with mandate at the end was / is almost no different from the govt conducting tests on unaware military members by injecting them with LSD & uranium past. The only difference in this case was their effort was an attempt to rapidly counter a ChiCom 'WMD'...(and / or to test the govt's ability to react to such enemy attacks in the future).
We already had drugs we KNEW were effective against COVID..SO WHY DID THE US GOVT OPPOSE THEIR USE...REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THEY WORKED, AND ATTACKED ANYONE (USING THE MEDIA TO HELP) WHO SUGGESTED USING THESE OTHER MEDICINES?
(I don't want to get 'conspiratorial' or be labeled a 'Conspiracy Theorist', BUT...
In the midst of a pandemic in which millions are dying why would you reject and demonize ANY already approved medication that proved itself to be even somewhat effective against the virus while you are trying to create a new vaccine?
Why would you do so to protect a new drug that skipped required safety protocols, purposely did not research possible harmful side effects, and was not being tested?
Big Pharma demanding immunity should have set off 'alarm bells'...
...but A LOT of politicians were heavily invested in these Big Pharma companies. So why not legislate / pressuring the squashing of already existing drugs that were proven safe and cod / did help while mandating Americans take multiple doses and boosters of the new drug made by the company you're invested in and stand to make a lot of money from, especially when their profits ate protected from liability law suits?!
It only stands to reason at least SOME of those in charge making these decisions already knew these things....
(I am betting, like with most decisions made by politicians in DC, more could be exposed simy by applying that old adage - 'Flow The Money'.)
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 73,373
- 39,856
- 2,605
mamooth
Diamond Member
18 months ago, you cranks said we'd be dead within a year.
You're doing what all end-times cultists do. After your prediction of doomsday fails, you simply push the date of doomsday back a little more.
LordBrownTrout
Diamond Member
More coming out from the new england journal of medicine:
"A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) shows not only that the effectiveness of the Pfizer Covid vaccine becomes negative (meaning the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated) within five months but that the vaccine destroys any protection a person has from natural immunity."
The study is a large observational study that looks at 887,193 children aged 5 to 11 years in North Carolina, of whom 273,157 (30.8%) received at least one dose of Pfizer vaccine between November 1st 2021 and June 3rd 2022. The study includes 193,346 SARS-CoV-2 infections reported between March 11th 2020 and June 3rd 2022.
dailysceptic.org
"A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) shows not only that the effectiveness of the Pfizer Covid vaccine becomes negative (meaning the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated) within five months but that the vaccine destroys any protection a person has from natural immunity."
The study is a large observational study that looks at 887,193 children aged 5 to 11 years in North Carolina, of whom 273,157 (30.8%) received at least one dose of Pfizer vaccine between November 1st 2021 and June 3rd 2022. The study includes 193,346 SARS-CoV-2 infections reported between March 11th 2020 and June 3rd 2022.
Covid Vaccine Destroys Natural Immunity, NEJM Study Shows – The Daily Sceptic
A new study in NEJM shows not only that Pfizer vaccine effectiveness becomes negative within five months but that the vaccines destroy any protection a person would have had from natural immunity.
dailysceptic.org
Deplorable Yankee
Diamond Member
This is loooooong
stevekirsch.substack.com
Proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID vaccines then deliberately covered it up
Israel didn't start to gather safety data until a year into the vaccine program. They gathered 6 months worth of data and found that the vaccines weren't safe so they lied to the world about it.
Exclusive: Proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID vaccines then deliberately covered it up
Israel didn't start to gather safety data until a year into the vaccine program. They gathered 6 months worth of data and found that the vaccines weren't safe so they lied to the world about it.
stevekirsch.substack.com
LordBrownTrout
Diamond Member
No one is saying that people didn't die from this virus. The discussion at hand is how dangerous and deadly the mRNA injections are.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 73,373
- 39,856
- 2,605
PenelopeMore coming out from the new england journal of medicine:
"A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) shows not only that the effectiveness of the Pfizer Covid vaccine becomes negative (meaning the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated) within five months but that the vaccine destroys any protection a person has from natural immunity."
The study is a large observational study that looks at 887,193 children aged 5 to 11 years in North Carolina, of whom 273,157 (30.8%) received at least one dose of Pfizer vaccine between November 1st 2021 and June 3rd 2022. The study includes 193,346 SARS-CoV-2 infections reported between March 11th 2020 and June 3rd 2022.
Covid Vaccine Destroys Natural Immunity, NEJM Study Shows – The Daily Sceptic
A new study in NEJM shows not only that Pfizer vaccine effectiveness becomes negative within five months but that the vaccines destroy any protection a person would have had from natural immunity.
Hey Penny, your immune system is shot thanks to all those jabs you’ve taken. Good luck.
Unlike you, I don’t demand you die and do so without any medical assistance.
NAZI!
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 73,373
- 39,856
- 2,605
That’s funny. Old dumb Joe Biden said before last winter it was going to be Hell for the unvaxxed. I laughed at the stupid fuck then and still do.
Remember?
mamooth
Diamond Member
Um, no. The study says nothing like that. Your kook-liar source is just flat-out making stuff up.
That is, it's like all antivaxxer sources.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
The government gave a green light, a blank check, and complete immunity from being held responsible for any repercussions to pharmaceutical companies to create an experimental drug and then made getting the vaccines mandatory.
How does it feel to find out, if you got any, you were used as a guinea pig by your federal government, especially after experiencing any of the I'll after-effects of the vaccine?
"Ethically Unjustifiable" - Scientists from Harvard & Johns Hopkins Found Covid-19 Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than the Virus | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
A new pre-print study by nine health experts from major universities showed that the COVID-19 vaccines are 98 times worse than the virus, and mandatory booster vaccination in college is “ethically unjustifiable,” as reported by Epoch Times.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Lets do the math.
97,481,146 people had COVID, 1,078,457 died from it. That is a 1.11% death rate.
225,000,000 people in the US have been vaccinated. 1.11%x98=99.57. That means that in the US there should be 224,000,000 people dead from the vaccine.
Well shit, no wonder there are so many open jobs.
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Yet you do not laugh at those that said all those that took the vaccine would already be dead.
Why is that?
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 73,373
- 39,856
- 2,605
I don’t laugh at everything.
LordBrownTrout
Diamond Member
The nejm is not a kook source.
mamooth
Diamond Member
Yes, but that's not the source that told the fake story. The NEJM said one thing, and antivaxxer loons claimed they said something different.
The government gave a green light, a blank check, and complete immunity from being held responsible for any repercussions to pharmaceutical companies to create an experimental drug and then made getting the vaccines mandatory.
How does it feel to find out, if you got any, you were used as a guinea pig by your federal government, especially after experiencing any of the I'll after-effects of the vaccine?
"Ethically Unjustifiable" - Scientists from Harvard & Johns Hopkins Found Covid-19 Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than the Virus | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
A new pre-print study by nine health experts from major universities showed that the COVID-19 vaccines are 98 times worse than the virus, and mandatory booster vaccination in college is “ethically unjustifiable,” as reported by Epoch Times.
Keep clinging to your lies, loser.
You Trumptards are dying at 10x the rest of the country because of the virus.
LOL
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,359
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #60
So you are saying the CDC lies....
Actually they do and have admitted they have done so...
...but the CDC had admitted that the COVID Vaccine will not prevent you from catching COVID.
HELL, 4-time vaccinated Joe Biden caught COVID, as did the 1st Lady...
....but these facts have not syopped your yapping like an irritating all-mouth chihuahua.
CDC: 'People who are vaccinated may still get COVID-19.'
People who have gotten 4 shots have gotten COVID.
Frequently Asked Questions about COVID-19 Vaccination
FAQs about COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine cost, availability, and types.
www.cdc.gov
Similar threads
New Topics
-
Advertising + Firearms = Homosexuality+Poverty
- Started by SkyscrapersUS
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
