Vaccinated people may never regain full immunity

[Rigby5]

Wrong??? You’re calling the data and conclusions in report referenced in the OP wrong?

Not sure if I misunderstood or not, but here is your post again.

{...
What a fascinating report. Thank you for posting. It really does show how wonderful these vaccines have been. The final conclusions especially….

—————
Summary of impact on hospitalisations, infections and mortality
UKHSA previously reported on the number of hospitalisations directly averted by vaccination. In total, around 261,500 hospitalisations have been prevented in those aged 45 years and over up to 19 September 2021.
UKHSA and University of Cambridge MRC Biostatistics Unit previously reported on the direct and indirect impact of the vaccination programme on infections and mortality. Estimates suggest that 127,500 deaths and 24,144,000 infections have been prevented as a result of the COVID- 19 vaccination programme, up to 24 September.
Neither of these models will be updated going forward. This is due to these models being unable to account for the interventions that would have been implemented in the absence of vaccination. Consequently, over time the state of the actual pandemic and the no-vaccination pandemic scenario have become increasingly less comparable. For further context surrounding this figure and for previous estimates, please see previous vaccine surveillance reports.
...}

It appears you are calling these vaccines "wonderful" and are stressing how "Estimates suggest that 127,500 deaths and 24,144,000 infections have been prevented as a result of the COVID- 19 vaccination programme".

The vaccines are not wonderful, and have not prevented any infections or deaths.
By temporarily reducing infection, they prevent herd immunity, which keeps supplying new hosts, so then cause the epidemic to kill the most people by preventing it from ending.

 

[Slade3200]

Not sure if I misunderstood or not, but here is your post again.

{...
What a fascinating report. Thank you for posting. It really does show how wonderful these vaccines have been. The final conclusions especially….

—————
Summary of impact on hospitalisations, infections and mortality
UKHSA previously reported on the number of hospitalisations directly averted by vaccination. In total, around 261,500 hospitalisations have been prevented in those aged 45 years and over up to 19 September 2021.
UKHSA and University of Cambridge MRC Biostatistics Unit previously reported on the direct and indirect impact of the vaccination programme on infections and mortality. Estimates suggest that 127,500 deaths and 24,144,000 infections have been prevented as a result of the COVID- 19 vaccination programme, up to 24 September.
Neither of these models will be updated going forward. This is due to these models being unable to account for the interventions that would have been implemented in the absence of vaccination. Consequently, over time the state of the actual pandemic and the no-vaccination pandemic scenario have become increasingly less comparable. For further context surrounding this figure and for previous estimates, please see previous vaccine surveillance reports.
...}

It appears you are calling these vaccines "wonderful" and are stressing how "Estimates suggest that 127,500 deaths and 24,144,000 infections have been prevented as a result of the COVID- 19 vaccination programme".

The vaccines are not wonderful, and have not prevented any infections or deaths.
By temporarily reducing infection, they prevent herd immunity, which keeps supplying new hosts, so then cause the epidemic to kill the most people by preventing it from ending.

So the answer is yes you are calling the conclusions of the the report wrong. Is that correct?

 

[Rigby5]

So the answer is yes you are calling the conclusions of the the report wrong. Is that correct?

Yes.
The mRNA injection cause the local cells to go crazy and start growing spike proteins.
The immune system detects the mRNA and spike proteins debris, and stimulates some antibodies.
So that did accidentally have the slight positive effect of these antibodies also taking out some covid viruses.
But only for less than 6 months.
After that, the immune system was depleted and the person even more vulnerable.
No covid memory ever was put into T-cells in your bone marrow, so you got zero immunity memory.
So then yes, the report was wrong.
It jumped to an early conclusion that was not warranted by the long term results.

 

[Slade3200]

Yes.
The mRNA injection cause the local cells to go crazy and start growing spike proteins.
The immune system detects the mRNA and spike proteins debris, and stimulates some antibodies.
So that did accidentally have the slight positive effect of these antibodies also taking out some covid viruses.
But only for less than 6 months.
After that, the immune system was depleted and the person even more vulnerable.
No covid memory ever was put into T-cells in your bone marrow, so you got zero immunity memory.
So then yes, the report was wrong.
It jumped to an early conclusion that was not warranted by the long term results.

Hahaha, so the injections just accidentally created antibodies which prevented contraction in some cases and reduced symptoms in other cases?? You’re funny