Why is this being brought up again? I'm just curious. It was an interesting read for sure.
It was, especially if you go back and read from the beginning. It tells you something about the environment here. I put together a summary, just because it stretches credulity:
RD, intro: Here's my background, blah blah... I voted for Bush, he pulled some shit.
Post 2: So you voted for O'bama?
RD: McCain's education credentials are poor.
Gang: That means have Obama's college transcripts! (non sequitur)
RD: O'bama edited the Harvard Law Review.
Gang: Hey dick weed, where does the Consitution provide for education? (<< red herring)
Gang: But...but.. education doesn't mean smart. Words on a piece of paper. And where are those Obama transcripts?
RD: didn't say I had them. Isn't education important?
Gang: You're dancing, you're losing, you're lame. You're moving goalposts! (<< Danth's Law)
Gang: par for the course for "used to be Republican" types (<< poisoning the well)
Gang: but..but.. you said you couldn't vote for poor academic credentials.
Therefore, prove you have Obama's credentials. (<< affirming the consequent)
Gang: Not arguing against education, but a college degree means nothing.
Gang (
next post): nobody's arguing against education, that's your strawman.

Gang: Hey, you spelled Laboratory [sic] wrong!
Gang: you've been bitch slapped! Can't swim with the sharks! Feeble minded!
RD: you guys never took Bush to task for "nucyulur".
Gang: Liar! Fraud! Baiter! Personal problem! Meltdown!
---- all this in an
Intro to the Board thread.
Not sure what the fuck is
wrong with some of y'all...