USAID headquarters in Washington closed/websites down after Musk says Trump agrees to close the aid agency

The leftists unhinged response to the closure of USAID is ample evidence that Trump is right on target.
I'd describe it more as the shock that DOGE really does have power, and that rusty levers are being pulled by Trump that have not been pulled in decades of USAID and other .gov abuse.

Even sad-sack Dana Bash was forced to admit that USAID has a lot of problesms....I could hardly believe those words came out of her mouth.
 
LOL....From the **** around and find out files:


WASHINGTON (AP) — Staffers of the U.S. Agency for International Development were instructed to stay out of the agency’s Washington headquarters, and yellow police tape and officers blocked the agency's lobby on Monday, after billionaire Elon Musk announced President Donald Trump had agreed with him to shut the agency.

USAID staffers also said more than 600 additional employees had reported being locked out of the agency’s computer systems overnight. Those still in the system received emails saying that “at the direction of Agency leadership” the headquarters building “will be closed to Agency personnel on Monday, Feb. 3.” The agency's website vanished Saturday without explanation.

The fast-moving developments come after thousands of USAID employees already have been laid off and programs shut down in the two weeks since President Donald Trump took office and show the extraordinary power of Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, in the Trump administration. Musk announced closing of the agency early Monday

It’s not enough just to shut it down. There needs to be investigations, arrests, trials, and punishment.

Clearances need to be pulled, and people need to be forbidden to ever work for the govt again.

I’ll settle for nothing less than scorched earth.
Wow. That's a bold move.
 
While I do not wish to debate the merits of your statement, I would note that these are congressionally legislated and funded programs, yes? If so, they cannot be unilaterally ended by the Executive.
Correct, they legally cannot.
 
.


Not worried. I donate regularly to the hungry locally and to a maternity home where they save babies from being aborted.

The rest of them are not my business.

But that was a nice try. We are all SO OVER the guilt y'all try to use as a cudgel.







.
I hope you have the courtesy and the courage to read my entire post.

I see you proudly display a cross in your avatar. I will take you at your word when you say you donate locally.

Perfect.

As a Reagan conservative, I used to buy into the narrative that private organizations should carry the social welfare load.

But I discovered it's bullshit, and I will explain why.

One day at work during a meeting, I saw through our conference room window a homeless man eating out of a garbage can. After the meeting, I went and found him.

He was mentally ill, and our state thoroughly sucks at taking care of such people. Part of his affliction was that he could not bear to be around other people. This paranoia was part of his illness. He explained this to me when I offered to take him to a shelter. He chose to live in a tent in the woods.

Due to this interaction, and out of tremendous gratitude I feel for the gifts God has given me, I founded two faith-based non-profits to help the people in need in my community.

As a social experiment, I registered one with the government. Any donations to that one would be tax deductible. I did not register the second one. Any donations to that one would not be tax deductible.

In this way, I would be able to see whether donations were for write-offs or came from the heart.

It takes some time to get word around about a new non-profit in town, but as time passed these non-profits grew far beyond my wildest dreams. We had donations from every community leader and every community organization like the Kiwanis, the Chamber of Commerce, and so forth. We also had a large base of individual donors. We have a deeply religious community.

It seemed like the conservative narrative was working.

In addition to my own charities, the local churches were also actively involved in helping the less fortunate.

I did due diligence in the extreme. A person could not just walk in off the street and ask for our help. They would have to be referred to me by a community leader. The fire department chaplain would frequently send people to me. People like that.

I only accepted people who were in dire straits through no fault of their own. A boy with cerebral palsy who needed a new wheelchair his mother couldn't afford. A mentally disabled man who had cancer who needed new clothes because he was wasting away. A family whose breadwinner had died in a car accident. I could go on for hundreds of cases.

One of the more bizarre cases was a Native American who was stabbed in the head by our local Nazis.

I could not believe this was true. But I found his landlord who said the victim never missed a rental payment. I talked to the police. I even talked to the paramedics who treated and transported the guy.

Holy shit, it was for real!

Those of us who ran my charities never took so much as a penny for ourselves. Our administrative costs were paid out of my pocket.

I never once gave our recipients cash. Not a nickel. I paid their utility bills. I paid their rent. I paid for their family members' funeral expenses. I bought them groceries and Christmas presents for their kids. Hundreds and hundreds of things like that.

Years prior, I was in a conversation with some people. A woman was complaining she had some party animal neighbors who had no money to buy groceries, so she gave them money for food. They used the money to buy more booze instead, and she was pissed.

A wise old man said to her, "If you wanted them to have FOOD, you should have given them FOOD!"

And that was the basis for my two organizations and why I never gave anyone cash.

Over time, this work exploded. The donations were phenomenal. Beyond my wildest dreams.

For some strange reason, the tax exempt one faltered while the non tax-exempt one flourished. So I shut down the tax-exempt one.

And here is where the narrative about welfare should be handled privately broke down.

Despite every church in town assisting the needy, and despite various other organizations assisting the needy, and despite my own wildly successful charity assisting the needy, it wasn't enough.

Not nearly enough.

I had to take on the soul-crushing task of performing triage. I had to decide which cases to take, and which ones to refuse. And then I had to look into the eyes of the people I had to turn away.

I had to turn away a woman with ovarian cancer. I'll never forget that one. It will always be with me.

So you can wave your cross around, and you can "regularly" donate to your favorite local charity.

But it isn't enough. Not nearly enough.
 
Last edited:
Correct, they legally cannot.
This is my issue.

If you want to make things more efficient. Thats fine. but getting rid of agencies and spending that the government does is not decided by the Executive, but by the Legislature. Its up to the Legislature to get rid of USAID, anything else is an unconstitutional usurpation of legislative authority.
 

USAID headquarters in Washington closed​


https://media.giphy.com/media/l4HnRU5mEEnbfInYI/giphy.gif
 
We don't need no stinking evidence....

Thank you for your honesty.

Thats HONESTLY what goes on in most MAGA heads and it explains most of the bs they believe. They are just usually not bold enough like you to simply admit it.

Bravo :clap:
 
This is my issue.

If you want to make things more efficient. Thats fine. but getting rid of agencies and spending that the government does is not decided by the Executive, but by the Legislature. Its up to the Legislature to get rid of USAID, anything else is an unconstitutional usurpation of legislative authority.

Marco Rubio is in charge as of now.

If the money isn't verifiably going to the ones that the legislature designated it for, that would then be a problem for you, yes?
 
15th post
I hope you have the courtesy and the courage to read my entire post.

I see you proudly display a cross in your avatar. I will take you at your word when you say you donate locally.

Perfect.

As a Reagan conservative, I used to buy into the narrative that private organizations should carry the social welfare load.

But I discovered it's bullshit, and I will explain why.

One day at work during a meeting, I saw through our conference room window a homeless man eating out of a garbage can. After the meeting, I went and found him.

He was mentally ill, and our state thoroughly sucks at taking care of such people. Part of his affliction was that he could not bear to be around other people. This paranoia was part of his illness. He explained this to me when I offered to take him to a shelter. He chose to live in a tent in the woods.

Due to this interaction, and out of tremendous gratitude I feel for the gifts God has given me, I founded two faith-based non-profits to help the people in need in my community.

As a social experiment, I registered one with the government. Any donations to that one would be tax deductible. I did not register the second one. Any donations to that one would not be tax deductible.

In this way, I would be able to see whether donations were for write-offs or came from the heart.

It takes some time to get word around about a new non-profit in town, but as time passed these non-profits grew far beyond my wildest dreams. We had donations from every community leader and every community organization like the Kiwanis, the Chamber of Commerce, and so forth. We also had a large base of individual donors. We have a deeply religious community.

It seemed like the conservative narrative was working.

In addition to my own charities, the local churches were also actively involved in helping the less fortunate.

I did due diligence in the extreme. A person could not just walk in off the street and ask for our help. They would have to be referred to me by a community leader. The fire department chaplain would frequently send people to me. People like that.

I only accepted people who were in dire straits through no fault of their own. A boy with cerebral palsy who needed a new wheelchair his mother couldn't afford. A mentally disabled man who had cancer who needed new clothes because he was wasting away. A family whose breadwinner had died in a car accident. I could go on for hundreds of cases.

One of the more bizarre cases was a Native American who was stabbed in the head by our local Nazis.

I could not believe this was true. But I found his landlord who said the victim never missed a rental payment. I talked to the police. I even talked to the paramedics who treated and transported the guy.

Holy shit, it was for real!

Those of us who ran my charities never took so much as a penny for ourselves. Our administrative costs were paid out of my pocket.

I never once gave our recipients cash. Not a nickel. I paid their utility bills. I paid their rent. I paid for their family members' funeral expenses. I bought them groceries and Christmas presents for their kids. Hundreds and hundreds of things like that.

Years prior, I was in a conversation with some people. A woman was complaining she had some party animal neighbors who had no money to buy groceries, so she gave them money for food. They used the money to buy more booze instead, and she was pissed.

A wise old man said to her, "If you wanted them to have FOOD, you should have given them FOOD!"

And that was the basis for my two organizations and why I never gave anyone cash.

Over time, this work exploded. The donations were phenomenal. Beyond my wildest dreams.

For some strange reason, the tax exempt one faltered while the non tax-exempt one flourished. So I shut down the tax-exempt one.

And here is where the narrative about welfare should be handled privately broke down.

Despite every church in town assisting the needy, and despite various other organizations assisting the needy, and despite my own wildly successful charity assisting the needy, it wasn't enough.

Not nearly enough.

I had to take on the soul-crushing task of performing triage. I had to decide which cases to take, and which ones to refuse. And then I had to look into the eyes of the people I had to turn away.

I had to turn away a woman with ovarian cancer. I'll never forget that one. It will always be with me.

So you can wave your cross around, and you can "regularly" donate to your favorite local charity.

But it isn't enough. Not nearly enough.

Because only our intelligence agencies can do it properly.
 
Back
Top Bottom