US Supreme Court : Agrees with the President : MS13 gangster Kilmar Abrego Garcia must stay in El Salvador's SuperMax

[Blaster]

She is a terrible judge.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Barrett did not join her conservative colleagues in the 5-4 vote. Roberts acquiescence to lawlessness is disappointing. It was expected from the other four.

Disappointing, perhaps, but not surprising.

Roberts is as much of a partisan conservative ideologue more interested in propping up the fascist Trump regime than defending the Constitution.

 

[mudwhistle]

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

Nope. Clearly she's controlled by her bigotry.

She could give a shit about the law.

She supports illegal immigration because she's Puerto Rican

 

[mudwhistle]

Disappointing, perhaps, but not surprising.

Roberts is as much of a partisan conservative ideologue more interested in propping up the fascist Trump regime than defending the Constitution.

Recent events proved otherwise.

 

[theHawk]

Mods, I do not have a link for the dissent. I copied it off screenshots from a TV broadcast I watched. This is as close as I could get.

Sotomayor excoriates 'inexplicable' decision to side with Trump admin in deportation case

Justice Sonia Sotomayor tore into the Trump administration and her colleagues with a scathing dissent in a case over the president's use of the Alien Enemies Act.

lawandcrime.com

She writes, the ruling "may have life or death consequences. Individuals who are unable to secure counsel, or who can not timely appeal an adverse judgement rendered by a habeas court, face the prospect of removal in to perilous conditions of El Salvador's CECOT, where detainees suffer egregious human rights abuses.........Anyone the Government mistakenly deports in its piecemeal and rushed implementation of the challenged Proclamation will face the same risk.

The implication of the Government's position is that not only noncitizens but also US citizens could be taken off the streets, forced on to planes, and confined to foreign prisons with no opportunity for redress if judicial review is denied unlawfully before removal.

History is no stranger to such lawless regimes, but this Nation's system of laws is designed to prevent, not enable, their rise."

Barrett did not join her conservative colleagues in the 5-4 vote. Roberts acquiescence to lawlessness is disappointing. It was expected from the other four.

The majority ignores trump's Proclamation is invalid on its face as we are not at war with Venezuela. Therefore it willfully ignores the extraordinary circumstance surrounding this case.

She’s a total moron who cut-n-pasted her opinion from the ACLU

I mean, we’re talking about a moron who asked why OSHA couldn’t treat Federal employees like buildings in order to force them to be injected with experimental mRNA.

 

[Rawley]

Disappointing, perhaps, but not surprising.

Roberts is as much of a partisan conservative ideologue more interested in propping up the fascist Trump regime than defending the Constitution.

LOL 7-2

Guess Kagan has gone MAGA

Supreme Court halts judge’s order to reinstate federal probationary workers

The case focuses on a judge's requirement that employees fired by the Trump administration be fully reinstated while litigation continues.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[jackflash]

She's Hispanic so **** the law.

The courts are the last stronghold for the statist left commies. The upcoming midterm elections should the conservatives land several more senate seats, may see quite the change in how the court(s) operate in both attitude & compatibility with the executive branch. Until then the lefty judges will remain a thorn in the side of our America, unfortunately.

 

[Rogue AI]

Nope...

ICE have claimed this was an administrative error... If that administrative error was to deport an US Citizen would you say the same thing?

ICE have to understand when a Judge says no, no it is...

The illegal alien is no longer in the country. Judges have no power to compel foreign governments nor the executive branch in matters of foreign policy. This is over.

 

[mudwhistle]

Depends on how fast we can launch the illegal aliens/statist lefties out of country.

Build a wall and catapult them over it.

 

[BluesLegend]

Sotomayor dissents​

IMPEACH her for treason!

 

[BluesLegend]

Build a wall and catapult them over it.

Make catapults great again!

 

[Nostra]

Mods, I do not have a link for the dissent. I copied it off screenshots from a TV broadcast I watched. This is as close as I could get.

Sotomayor excoriates 'inexplicable' decision to side with Trump admin in deportation case

Justice Sonia Sotomayor tore into the Trump administration and her colleagues with a scathing dissent in a case over the president's use of the Alien Enemies Act.

lawandcrime.com

She writes, the ruling "may have life or death consequences. Individuals who are unable to secure counsel, or who can not timely appeal an adverse judgement rendered by a habeas court, face the prospect of removal in to perilous conditions of El Salvador's CECOT, where detainees suffer egregious human rights abuses.........Anyone the Government mistakenly deports in its piecemeal and rushed implementation of the challenged Proclamation will face the same risk.

The implication of the Government's position is that not only noncitizens but also US citizens could be taken off the streets, forced on to planes, and confined to foreign prisons with no opportunity for redress if judicial review is denied unlawfully before removal.

History is no stranger to such lawless regimes, but this Nation's system of laws is designed to prevent, not enable, their rise."

Barrett did not join her conservative colleagues in the 5-4 vote. Roberts acquiescence to lawlessness is disappointing. It was expected from the other four.

The majority ignores trump's Proclamation is invalid on its face as we are not at war with Venezuela. Therefore it willfully ignores the extraordinary circumstance surrounding this case.

I guess she hasn’t been told about all the deaths of innocent Americans at the hands of Biden/Harris and their imported illegal gangsters.

 

[TemplarKormac]

It's a win, and I'm thankful for that, but having to give them a chance to challenge their removal under due process, could really slow the effort to rid the country of Biden's flood.

In addition, ONCE AGAIN Amy Coney Barrett sided with the ******* libs on the court! Trump's one big mistake was nominating her.

Well... I'm happy they included that bit. It tells me SCOTUS is at least trying to stick to the Constitution. If it's wrong for Lincoln to deny habeas corpus then it's wrong for Trump to do it.

I'm working on being a more of a strict Constitutionalist.

How's my driving?

 

[OKTexas]

******* is political terminology. Ike gave them the name.
View attachment 1098263

Words that were acceptable during Ike's time aren't now. You need to adjust your rhetoric.

.

 

[BackAgain]

This is true. The Constitution doesn't even talk about citizenship until (what?) the 14th Amendment. It applies to The People of the United States. Period.

So does apportionment.

But non-citizens who belong to Foreign Terrorist groups who break the Rules of War (attacking civilians and civilian targets is numer uno) are not covered by the Constitution. In fact, they may be subject to summary exectuion depending on how one interprets the law.

So instead of making general, sweeping statements, let's talk about one case, one person or one action on its own merits.

It seems to me that all the COVID experts have now become immigration law experts. And before then, they were Russia-Russia-Russia experts. In between being election theft experts.

The highlighted portion is again not exactly accurate. HOWEVER, it is a good deal closer.

 

[Lesh]

And now Trump is talking aboit deporting American citizens to that jail in El Salvador

Does that bother you at all

 

[BackAgain]

No, it means present the case legally.

No. It’s Latin for “you may have the body.”

 

[BrokeLoser]

Words that were acceptable during Ike's time aren't now. You need to adjust your rhetoric.

.

How do you suppose courageous grown adults would discuss the MAJOR happening of 1954?

Operation Wetback - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[OKTexas]

How do you suppose courageous grown adults would discuss the MAJOR happening of 1954?

Operation Wetback - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Here's a clue, it's not 1954 anymore, things change.

.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Here's a clue, it's not 1954 anymore, things change.

.

Are there any other military operations you think grown adults should be afraid to discuss?