First, my suspicions was initially that it would require a special forces unit to take out this location. An entry, place explosives, a very daring and risky attack.
If this is true, it cannot be good. If the buildings did collapse though and are not useable, than I can't see how it would only put them back a couple of months unless they are enriching in another country.
I suppose we will know over time as more intelligence and hopefully accurate information is purchased by dissidents. You can be sure that the Iran regime will be promoting to their own people that everything is fine because they suspect such information would leak out. This is going to require recruiting some very trustworthy and high ranked Iranians, not an easy task.
A new U.S. intelligence report found that Iran's nuclear program has been set back by only a few months after a U.S. strike, and was not "completely and fully obliterated" as U.S. President Donald Trump has said, according to two people familiar with the early assessment.
The early intelligence report issued by the U.S. Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) on Monday contradicts statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
According to the people, the report found that while
the Saturday strikes at the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites did significant damage, the sites were not totally destroyed.
The assessment found that at least some of Iran's highly enriched uranium was moved out of multiple sites before the strikes and survived, according to the people. It also found that Iran's centrifuges are largely intact.