US Court Of International Trade Blocks All Of Trumps Tariffs. All Of Them

He either has the authority or doesn’t.

They say his “effort to justify them” exceeded his legal authority.

This is an admission he does have the authority to impose tariffs. They are just claiming he hasn’t properly justified them. What are the requirements to “justify” them according to the law?

Sounds more like radical judges usurping the power of the President again.

Did these judges rule that Obama couldn’t enact tariffs when he did it? Nope. It’s all political with these people.

The only plus side is the idiots challenging this went to maybe the right court, instead of finding some simp district judge.
 

US Court Of International Trade Blocks All Of Trumps Tariffs. All Of Them​


This is a lie.

-Trump might still be able to temporarily launch import taxes of 15% for 150 days on nations with which the U.S. runs a substantial trade deficit. The ruling notes that a president has this authority under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.

-The ruling left in place any tariffs that Trump put in place using his Section 232 powers from the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. He put a 25% tax on most imported autos and parts, as well as on all foreign-made steel and aluminum. Those tariffs depend on a Commerce Department investigation that reveals national security risks from imported products.
 
A federal court has struck down Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that the president overstepped his legal authority in imposing them on a broad range of countries, according to media reports.

The U.S. Court of International Trade issued the unanimous decision Wednesday, rejecting Trump’s April 2 tariff order – which he claimed was justified by national emergencies, Politico reported. The court’s ruling, however, found that justification inadequate under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The three-judge panel also ordered that tariffs collected under Trump’s order be “vacated.” The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


That includes China. And the US may have to pay all of them back.
Trump is a fucked up leader.
 
If American industry can't compete, maybe it needs to die.

Protectionism never works. It just hurts consumers.
Don't you simultaneously argue that unions are doing a good thing when they force higher prices and put American industry in this exact position, unable to compete with cheaper foreign producers?

Seems a little contradictory. If we could force American workers to take significant pay cuts, we would not need tariffs.
 
Ha, this is a hoot!

What a klutz, our fuckin president doesn't even know how the US works, total bozo.

King Trump my ass.

Trump the slump !

Funny how the markets ramp, when Trump is overruled, China must be laughing their ass off!

:auiqs.jpg:
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
It's just a chess game.

I've never heard of this "court" but all Trump has to do is let Congress handle it
Congress can't handle what is already on its plate.
Besides, congress has no agreed upon strategy for managing or negotiating tariffs. It wouldn't work.
They gave the president tariff authority, let the Executive manage tariffs.
 
That includes China. And the US may have to pay all of them back.
First off, your unamerican nature disgusts me, and secondly, there isnt a fucking chance in Hell that the US will being paying anyone back, nor will this dipshit court hold any power whatsoever over Trumps trade war. Grow up, retard. :cuckoo:
 
Oh, he'll flounder around, and then like a five year old, he'll find something else to attract his attention.

He hasn't been talking smack about annexing Greenland lately, has he?

He is constantly doing that. He did it all through his career.

When the buzzards come home to roost on his last disasterous half assed idea, he's already out there with a new shiny object.

In case you haven't notices, all his shiny objects are designed to appeal to his parochial, racist, know nothing (and proud of it) audience.

And he's still campaigning.
 
Don't you simultaneously argue that unions are doing a good thing when they force higher prices and put American industry in this exact position, unable to compete with cheaper foreign producers?

Seems a little contradictory. If we could force American workers to take significant pay cuts, we would not need tariffs.

The right wing fantasy that these high paying union jobs are going to come back if we retreat from global markets and try and manufacture everything in the US. is self contradictory.
 
Back
Top Bottom