US Court Of International Trade Blocks All Of Trumps Tariffs. All Of Them

[M14 Shooter]

The court’s ruling, however, found that justification inadequate under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).=

A list of ongoing "National Emergencies" used to invoke executive action under the IEEPA:

International Emergency Economic Powers Act - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I'd love to see a rational, reasoned argument for the position that the justifications for the last 5 national emergencies are inconsistent with the preceding 40 or so.
Anyone?
skews13 ? 0311 ? You got anything?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Why did Congress delegate authority to the executive?

The need to act quickly to changing conditions.

 

[Care4all]

Why did Congress delegate authority to the executive?

Google it. There are several good articles on our history of tariffs and trade agreements out there.

 

[Care4all]

Oops…

View attachment 1116784

Not an oops, it makes sense since Trump is appealing....

 

[Mac-7]

NAFTA was voted on in Congress. So was USMCA.

Yes. But all congress did was vote yes or no

The executive negotiated the treaties

However a tariff is not a treaty

 

[Mac-7]

Congress voted on the last 16 of 17 trade agreements negotiated by presidents.

Sure.

But a tariff is not a trade agreement

Congress is not equipped to manage foreign trade

I think trump will win this argument with the libs

But it will leave him - and America - in limbo for a while

 

[Care4all]

Maybe. Much of it depends on the necessity of the product and US competition that does no have tariffs.

True as well.

 

[Unkotare]

A federal court has struck down Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that the president overstepped his legal authority in imposing them on a broad range of countries, according to media reports.

The U.S. Court of International Trade issued the unanimous decision Wednesday, rejecting Trump’s April 2 tariff order – which he claimed was justified by national emergencies, Politico reported. The court’s ruling, however, found that justification inadequate under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The three-judge panel also ordered that tariffs collected under Trump’s order be “vacated.” The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/trump-tariffs-trade-court-ruling

That includes China. And the US may have to pay all of them back.

You were saying?

 

[WEATHER53]

You were saying?

Yeah the false thread title should send this one to General discussion

 

[Care4all]

Sure.

But a tariff is not a trade agreement

Congress is not equipped to manage foreign trade

I think trump will win this argument with the libs

But it will leave him - and America - in limbo for a while

Tariffs are in trade agreements, the President single handedly changing all those tariffs and non tariff products, agreed upon in the legal, sign by all parties trade agreement for no emergency reason that was declared, is illegal....is what this trade court decided yesterday....in the suit brought by State Attorney Generals.

They said the president can keep wheeling and dealing all he wants basically, but he can not do so as sweeping and broad as he did, under the authority of this emergency that he declared which was specific to the fentanyl crisis in America with drugs coming in through Canada and Mexico.

Congress can also legislate more temporary authority given to him.

 

[Delldude]

Google it. There are several good articles on our history of tariffs and trade agreements out there.

New the answer when I posted.....

 

[mudwhistle]

Not an oops, it makes sense since Trump is appealing....

Trump did an emergency appeal and got a stay on their ruling.

Trump's Tariffs Are Back in Effect After Appeals Court Ruling

An appeals court on Thursday stayed the ruling of the U.S. Court of International Trade that blocked President Donald Trump's Liberation Day tariffs, meaning the tariffs are back in effect.

www.breitbart.com

 

[Delldude]

My guess is they couldn't get anything done on their own.

Or vendoring out their own responsibilities. That's how the bureaucracy was born......pass 'fill in the blanks' bills.

You're right on with the lower court ruling.

Tariffs are in trade agreements, the President single handedly changing all those tariffs and non tariff products, agreed upon in the legal, sign by all parties trade agreement for no emergency reason that was declared, is illegal....is what this trade court decided yesterday....in the suit brought by State Attorney Generals.

He's only using that power on the countries who've had the biggest imbalances for decades, which is within the IEEPA . That's why the 10% tariff rates are out there on other countries.

 

[JoeB131]

But you wouldn't pass them all along if your profits decreased because sales decreased due to the price increase. See how that works? Yeah, the same goes for suppliers. They will eat some of the tariffs if their profits decrease due to less purchases. You guys are really stupid.

NO, stupid is imposing a tariff that increases the cost of doing business without providing any benefit.

 

[WEATHER53]

Unblocked
All of them
Fake thread title
All of it

 

[drudge X]

NO, stupid is imposing a tariff that increases the cost of doing business without providing any benefit.

So we should continue to allow other countries especially China to continue taking advantage of this country?

 

[Unkotare]

So we should continue to allow other countries especially China to continue taking advantage of this country?

You're asking that question to the wrong guy. Joeblow is posting with a hand on the back of his neck.

 

[JoeB131]

So we should continue to allow other countries especially China to continue taking advantage of this country?

How are they doing that?
Are there PLA detachments at your local WalMart making you buy Chinese goods?

Wait, there aren't? You are waddling down the rows on your Rascal buying Chinese goods over slightly more expensive American ones?

 

[DonGlock26]

A federal court has struck down Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that the president overstepped his legal authority in imposing them on a broad range of countries, according to media reports.

The U.S. Court of International Trade issued the unanimous decision Wednesday, rejecting Trump’s April 2 tariff order – which he claimed was justified by national emergencies, Politico reported. The court’s ruling, however, found that justification inadequate under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The three-judge panel also ordered that tariffs collected under Trump’s order be “vacated.” The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/trump-tariffs-trade-court-ruling

That includes China. And the US may have to pay all of them back.

Whoops - Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney Celebrated the Federal Trade Court Ruling a Touch too Early - The Last Refuge

The current Canadian Prime Minister is genuinely a walking meme of a Canadian Prime Minister parody. During his remarks to parliament today, Prime Minister Carney waxed gleefully about the U.S. federal trade court ruling against President Trump’s tariffs, just moments before the federal appeals...

theconservativetreehouse.com

 

[g5000]

A federal court has struck down Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs, ruling that the president overstepped his legal authority in imposing them on a broad range of countries, according to media reports.

The U.S. Court of International Trade issued the unanimous decision Wednesday, rejecting Trump’s April 2 tariff order – which he claimed was justified by national emergencies, Politico reported. The court’s ruling, however, found that justification inadequate under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The three-judge panel also ordered that tariffs collected under Trump’s order be “vacated.” The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/trump-tariffs-trade-court-ruling

That includes China. And the US may have to pay all of them back.

Well these judges, whoever they may be, are clearly pedophiles.