Let's see if we can make sense of this: Bush Jr took a surplus and created debt, he reduced taxes and the economy went into a tailspin down, the infrastructure of a once great nation began to collapse, he left having accomplished nothing but more debt and more debt, and yet in the minds of the wingnuts who would sign this nonsense, this was good. The only sense one can make of this is drug overdose caused by money, or glasses so thick reality is no where to be seen.
Even Reagan had more sense than this:
Newsflash: Ronald Reagan Raised Taxes (You Idiots) | Firedoglake
"There is no historical evidence that tax cuts spur economic growth. The highest period of growth in U.S. history (1933-1973) also saw its highest tax rates on the rich: 70 to 91 percent. During this period, the general tax rate climbed as well, but it reached a plateau in 1969, and growth slowed down five years later. Almost all rich nations have higher general taxes than the U.S., and they are growing faster as well."
Tax cuts spur economic growth
The Idolatry of Ideology-Why Tax Cuts Hurt the Economy by Russ Beaton
"I’m fully aware that I risk excommunication from the Church of Economic Science when I argue exactly the opposite: Tax cuts actually hurt the economy. It isn’t just that they don’t help, or that they’re ineffective—THEY REALLY HURT!
I can hear you thinking (even if your values bias makes you otherwise eager to agree): "Here comes the bleeding heart liberal, anti-trickle down, do something for humanity mantra.” No, indeed. I’m talking data here—numbers and empirical evidence. Check your values at the door and come on in."