Update on Clinton's and Trump's ideas/plans on health care in America

[Wry Catcher]

RAND [http://www.rand.org/about.html]

Food for thought:

Study finds 20M would lose health coverage under Trump plan

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I thought Obungles fixed healthcare? Guess not, eh?

 

[BULLDOG]

I thought Obungles fixed healthcare? Guess not, eh?

Nobody said the plan was perfect. Just that it is much better than doing nothing.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

ObamaCare continues to implode as we speak.

 

[Defiant1]

RAND [http://www.rand.org/about.html]

Food for thought:

Study finds 20M would lose health coverage under Trump plan

Is that because they would have to pay for it themselves?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

RAND [http://www.rand.org/about.html]

Food for thought:

Study finds 20M would lose health coverage under Trump plan

Does it address the cost of the respective proposals? Venezuela guaranteed a lifetime of prosperity and happiness, how'd that work out

 

[Eaglewings]

RAND [http://www.rand.org/about.html]

Food for thought:

Study finds 20M would lose health coverage under Trump plan

Many people do not realize that Trump will change the healthcare over to a pool for those getting sick..


The problem with this is that the congress/senate can easily defund this pool, which will shortly make the pool empty .

We will be right back where we were before Obama and people will be back to loosing our homes and cut off , die.

It is not a fix at all, if you know what his plan is about it is a camouflaged band-aide..

.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I thought Obungles fixed healthcare? Guess not, eh?

Don't lie. There is not evidence to ever support your statement, "I thought"!

 

[Wry Catcher]

ObamaCare continues to implode as we speak.

Idiot-gram. A single sentence not worthy of even being described as an opinion.

 

[Wry Catcher]

RAND [http://www.rand.org/about.html]

Food for thought:

Study finds 20M would lose health coverage under Trump plan

Is that because they would have to pay for it themselves?

Do try to keep up, if you don't know the basics of the issue, why don't you at least read and try to comprehend the issues?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

ObamaCare continues to implode as we speak.

Idiot-gram. A single sentence not worthy of even being described as an opinion.

Translation: I mock what I can't understand

 

[Wry Catcher]

RAND [http://www.rand.org/about.html]

Food for thought:

Study finds 20M would lose health coverage under Trump plan

Does it address the cost of the respective proposals? Venezuela guaranteed a lifetime of prosperity and happiness, how'd that work out

Read the link. Do some research, and stop posting non sequiturs (aka idiot-grams), Venezuela has zero to do with Health Care in America.

 

[Defiant1]

RAND [http://www.rand.org/about.html]

Food for thought:

Study finds 20M would lose health coverage under Trump plan

Is that because they would have to pay for it themselves?

Do try to keep up, if you don't know the basics of the issue, why don't you at least read and try to comprehend the issues?

Nowhere have I read that Trump's plan would forbid 20M people from buying health insurance.

 

[Greenbeard]

Nowhere have I read that Trump's plan would forbid 20M people from buying health insurance.

Repealing guaranteed issue rules means allowing insurers to prevent people from buying insurance. All generic GOP proposals, including Trump's, are designed to maximize the ability of insurers to avoid enrolling or paying for services for people who most need health care.

 

[Defiant1]

Nowhere have I read that Trump's plan would forbid 20M people from buying health insurance.

Repealing guaranteed issue rules means allowing insurers to prevent people from buying insurance. All generic GOP proposals, including Trump's, are designed to maximize the ability of insurers to avoid enrolling or paying for services for people who most need health care.

Do you mean that people will have to take personal responsibility to make sure they purchase the correct plan for their individual circumstances?

 

[Arianrhod]

Do you mean that people will have to take personal responsibility to make sure they purchase the correct plan for their individual circumstances?

You're describing the use of the insurance exchanges that are a result of the PPACA, i.e., what we have now.

 

[Defiant1]

Do you mean that people will have to take personal responsibility to make sure they purchase the correct plan for their individual circumstances?

You're describing the use of the insurance exchanges that are a result of the PPACA, i.e., what we have now.

No, I'm not.

 

[Greenbeard]

Do you mean that people will have to take personal responsibility to make sure they purchase the correct plan for their individual circumstances?

...no. I mean the market will close to people in particular circumstances.

 

[Defiant1]

Do you mean that people will have to take personal responsibility to make sure they purchase the correct plan for their individual circumstances?

...no. I mean the market will close to people in particular circumstances.

I doubt it. The market abhors a vacuum.

Possibly in very few circumstances, Hardly in 20M circumstances.

Now if you are saying that 20M will choose to go without insurance instead of paying high premiums, that's different.

I'll be the first in line.

 

[Arianrhod]

Do you mean that people will have to take personal responsibility to make sure they purchase the correct plan for their individual circumstances?

You're describing the use of the insurance exchanges that are a result of the PPACA, i.e., what we have now.

No, I'm not.

Because you don't understand how the exchanges work? I'll be happy to explain.

I doubt it. The market abhors a vacuum.

Possibly in very few circumstances, Hardly in 20M circumstances.

So no one was ever turned down for insurance prior to 2014? You can prove this, of course.