Universal Basic Income

Funny, I never mentioned any of that stuff.
Just making a joke out of your sky is falling secret organization , controlling your life. " They are hiding behind every bush. I find great humor in people that think the way you do. wouldn't want to be you , I wouldn't want to live in your scary world inside your head.

Quote from You
The ubi intertwines with the upcoming digital currency system and it will identify each person. Most people will accept.





"
 
UBI concept is a good idea , but when you listen to the right wing way that they want you to think it will be implemented. makes it look the way they want you to look at it and of course that is negatively. Point being there is not just one way to implement this concept it literally can be done with a 100 different scenarios 100 different monetary plans. but again it also can be done with tax law ,tax rate and just laws in general. There is only one thing that threatens capitalism in this country and that is not distributing the money into the hands of anyone but the wealthy. Which is known as supply side economics , yup trickle down lie. The only real advantage of capitalism is the promise of the potential for the workers to get ahead , that has literally been taken away totally by Reagan in 1981 and then Bush and Trump.
 
I have read all, or almost all, of Thomas Paine's writings. I think we have a user on this forum who has adopted Paine's name.

Thomas Paine is perhaps most well-known to Americans as being the author of Common Sense, a pamphlet which inspired every patriot to independence.

He also published a series of pamphlets under the title American Crisis. The most famous line most of us have heard from that series is, "These are the times which try men's souls."

Lesser known today, but quite famous during its time, was The Age of Reason. In this three part tome written after we gained independence, Paine completely deconstructed the Christian Bible. He ripped it to pieces.

Paine was an advocate of Deism.

The Age of Reason was a huge bestseller in the US. and led to a revival of deism here.

Not so well known today is Paine's Agrarian Justice.

Like most of our Founders, Paine believe in Natural Rights. He believed "landed property" was an inevitable violation of Natural Rights that needed to be mitigated as the poor were worse off under such a system than when humans had lived in a state of nature.

Paine's solution was for America to provide a tidy sum to every American who reached the age of 21, and to provide an annual sum to everyone who arrived at the age of 50.

The latter half is Social Security. The former is a precursor to a universal basic income, though Paine intended it to be a one time payment so the poor could buy cows or other means to support themselves.

What? Social Security proposed way back in 1797? And UBI, too?!?

It's a very fascinating piece to read, so here it is: http://www.piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Paine1795.pdf

Just as an aside, Thomas Jefferson also felt the same about the landed class violating Natural Rights, and he proposed a progressive tax on the wealthy, with most Americans being exempt from taxation. (Editing note: I originally posted it was James Madison, but I got the recipient and the sender reversed. See letter in post 4 below. My apologies.)

Our Founders were proto-commies! :lol:


Kamala Harris proposed a universal basic income when she was a US Senator in 2018, which puts here squarely in the Liberal column.

More in my next post.
U.B.i. can work within an ambitious predominantly caucasian society.
If U.B.i. is offered in a dark society more weed gets smoked, more Modello’s get drank and the baby factories run around the clock.
 
What value does Universal Basic Income bring to the table? What are the cons of bringing Universal Basic Income to the table? Who pays for it?
It serves as a safety net for the poor. It would help the economy in general because it would boost consumer spending. Paying for it, as a start, would be by cuttitng our bloated defense budget. It could also replace any current welfare for the poor such as SNAP or TANF.

The most important thing about this concept is that it wouldn’t replace people having jobs. The goal of a UBI program should be alleviating poverty for anyone working 40 hours a week.
 
I started this topic because of the current political landscape. To point out then-Senator Kamala Harris introduced a UBI bill.

She claims to have different views about a lot of things she believed back then, but still, this may be a topic of discussion for a while into the future if she wins.

She may move the UBI pebble a little further down the path just by normalizing the subject.
UBI is completely different than a negative income tax.

Everyone gets UBI. There is no reason we need another giant government agency to dole out another huge entitlement program to everyone in the nation.

The middle class and wealthy people need no payment from the government. This is a dumb idea.
 
It serves as a safety net for the poor. It would help the economy in general because it would boost consumer spending. Paying for it, as a start, would be by cuttitng our bloated defense budget. It could also replace any current welfare for the poor such as SNAP or TANF.

The most important thing about this concept is that it wouldn’t replace people having jobs. The goal of a UBI program should be alleviating poverty for anyone working 40 hours a week.
Isn't the point of UBI to give every adult citizen (universal) a small amount (basic income) unconditionally (no work requirements)? So let's pretend all you've proposed is true .. what is the proposed payment and payment frequency?
 
Isn't the point of UBI to give every adult citizen (universal) a small amount (basic income) unconditionally (no work requirements)? So let's pretend all you've proposed is true .. what is the proposed payment and payment frequency?
Some might have proposed no work requirements but isn’t the mainstream idea of it. The payment and frequency would just be based on current economic need. It would be a reflection of the status of cost of living.
 
Some might have proposed no work requirements but isn’t the mainstream idea of it. The payment and frequency would just be based on current economic need. It would be a reflection of the status of cost of living.
That's a nice subjective stance that provides no insight.

How much is the basic income payment? Is it for all or adults? What incentive does it provide to work so you don't need it? How does it make individuals less dependent on government? What economic need would drive frequency, and what is the proposed frequency? Weekly? Bi-weekly? Monthly? Quarterly?

You're just floating a fairy tale idea and can't answer basic questions about it.
 
That's a nice subjective stance that provides no insight.

How much is the basic income payment? Is it for all or adults? What incentive does it provide to work so you don't need it? How does it make individuals less dependent on government? What economic need would drive frequency, and what is the proposed frequency? Weekly? Bi-weekly? Monthly? Quarterly?

You're just floating a fairy tale idea and can't answer basic questions about it.
Those aren't all "basic questions". Asking someone exact dollar amount is not a basic question.

As for your general questions, if you are genuinely curious, there is a lot of material out there to read that answers them.
 
That's a nice subjective stance that provides no insight.

How much is the basic income payment? Is it for all or adults? What incentive does it provide to work so you don't need it? How does it make individuals less dependent on government? What economic need would drive frequency, and what is the proposed frequency? Weekly? Bi-weekly? Monthly? Quarterly?

You're just floating a fairy tale idea and can't answer basic questions about it.
lol this is so stupid. Why is it so important that I specifically say what these metrics would be? Why would that somehow undermine the entire idea of it? You think you’re making some witty argument by demanding specific metrics but it wouldn’t matter. With any economic policy, right wing or left wing, someone has to decide on specific numbers. Imagine if you proposed we cut more taxes for the middle class and then someone says to you “by how much? For who? How long? How would the tax cut be paid for in other revenue sources?” Do you have those metrics figured out for any theoretical economic idea you have? No. You don’t. You wouldn’t play by the same rules. You just want me to throw out an amount and then say “well who would decide that?!” Idiot. ANY economic idea has to be measured with specific amounts.

You’re also further a moron with this incentive to work question. I already explained that the income amount would not be enough for people to quit their jobs. It would just be enough to help impoverished full time workers. They couldn’t survive on the UBI by itself.
 
The ubi intertwines with the upcoming digital currency system and it will identify each person. Most people will accept.

You're complaining about digital surveillance while posting on the internet, fool. That ship sailed long ago, when the entire international banking system when online.

I'm more concerned about digital surveillance by the government to track women's periods and determine if they're going over state lines to get a legal abortion.

I'm concerned that a bunch of right wing theocrats have corrupted the US Supreme Court and are using it to establish laws to favour religious rights over civil rights. Enabling them to re-establish segregation and strip minorities and women of voting rights.
 
You're complaining about digital surveillance while posting on the internet, fool. That ship sailed long ago, when the entire international banking system when online.

I'm more concerned about digital surveillance by the government to track women's periods and determine if they're going over state lines to get a legal abortion.

I'm concerned that a bunch of right wing theocrats have corrupted the US Supreme Court and are using it to establish laws to favour religious rights over civil rights. Enabling them to re-establish segregation and strip minorities and women of voting rights.

No, you missed again.
 
That's a nice subjective stance that provides no insight.

How much is the basic income payment? Is it for all or adults? What incentive does it provide to work so you don't need it? How does it make individuals less dependent on government? What economic need would drive frequency, and what is the proposed frequency? Weekly? Bi-weekly? Monthly? Quarterly?

You're just floating a fairy tale idea and can't answer basic questions about it.

There is no requirement for work. That is the point - it's "universal". But in every jurisdiction where it's been tried, unemployment amoung the recipients declined. In study groups, every group with guaranteed income, had declining rates of unemployment at the end of one year on the program.

One of my neighbours in the 1990's was a single mother with 2 young children living on welfare - high school drop out, teen marriage. She had gone back to school and got her GED, and was taking a college course leading to an apprenticeship program. She was 6 months away from graduation, when Mike Harris was elected and immediately cut welfare payments by 20% across the board. She could no longer afford to buy a transit pass to go back and forth to school. $90 a month at the time.

It was 2 years before my neighbour could afford to return to school. She finished her course at the top of her class and was immediately working full time at a decent rate of pay. Taxpayers supported that family for 2 years at a cost of $20,000, when $540 dollars so she could afford a bus pass for 6 months would have saved taxpayers $19,460.

Being poor and never having enough money is very stressful. You have to have phone or you can't find work, but if you can't afford a phone, because your rent just went up, or you lost your job because of a recession, you're screwed. My single parent daughter just cut her WIFI to save money when she was between jobs, but it's really became a problem for her not to have internet access for herself or her children.

Those who received GUI knew their basic expenses were covered. They weren't juggling money all month long trying to keep their utilities going, deciding how much or how little to pay each account to jolly them along, and guessing wrong. Stress is exhausting, and it affects your health and ability to function.

In the studies done, recipients talked about the positive impact relief from that stress brought to their lives. They were better parents and had more time for their children. They had more time, energy and resources to upgrade their skills, or search for a job. Knowing that if the job didn't work out, they wouldn't be left with no money and no job, enabled them to take a job, and provided them with the window to work.



 
I have read all, or almost all, of Thomas Paine's writings. I think we have a user on this forum who has adopted Paine's name.

Thomas Paine is perhaps most well-known to Americans as being the author of Common Sense, a pamphlet which inspired every patriot to independence.

He also published a series of pamphlets under the title American Crisis. The most famous line most of us have heard from that series is, "These are the times which try men's souls."

Lesser known today, but quite famous during its time, was The Age of Reason. In this three part tome written after we gained independence, Paine completely deconstructed the Christian Bible. He ripped it to pieces.

Paine was an advocate of Deism.

The Age of Reason was a huge bestseller in the US. and led to a revival of deism here.

Not so well known today is Paine's Agrarian Justice.

Like most of our Founders, Paine believe in Natural Rights. He believed "landed property" was an inevitable violation of Natural Rights that needed to be mitigated as the poor were worse off under such a system than when humans had lived in a state of nature.

Paine's solution was for America to provide a tidy sum to every American who reached the age of 21, and to provide an annual sum to everyone who arrived at the age of 50.

The latter half is Social Security. The former is a precursor to a universal basic income, though Paine intended it to be a one time payment so the poor could buy cows or other means to support themselves.

What? Social Security proposed way back in 1797? And UBI, too?!?

It's a very fascinating piece to read, so here it is: http://www.piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Paine1795.pdf

Just as an aside, Thomas Jefferson also felt the same about the landed class violating Natural Rights, and he proposed a progressive tax on the wealthy, with most Americans being exempt from taxation. (Editing note: I originally posted it was James Madison, but I got the recipient and the sender reversed. See letter in post 4 below. My apologies.)

Our Founders were proto-commies! :lol:


Kamala Harris proposed a universal basic income when she was a US Senator in 2018, which puts here squarely in the Liberal column.

More in my next post.

'Landed Property' was the belief of most of the Founders, not Natural Rights.

all the right wing transfer of wealth to the golden few has been done with tax rates, tax law and just law. and can be mostly written to distribute the wealth in honorable way. right now so much wealth his taken in by doing nothing. and then giving that doing nothing a tax break also. it is insane.

Most people who take government assistance work full time. People will.continue to work, if UBI is implemented.

What bothers me about UBI is that other protections are not in place. So this wealth will just get funneled upward, like all wealth is, in this country.

Until we break the spell of the Reaganomics myth, we're just filtering money. Scooping it off the top of the fountain and pouring it into the bottom of the fountain.

There are some who believe that it's inevitable that we'll have to have a serious national conversation about this. Hopefully, given our present condition, that won't be for a while.

But if artificial intelligence and automation/technology continue on their current path, there's a pretty good chance that fewer workers will be needed in several career fields. The question then will be what to do.

If the conversation is needed, one can only hope that the country has eschewed this current childish tribalism and returned to some degree of sanity before that.

Their minds remain mired in the 50's.

If conservativism can't evolve to keep up with an advancing world, perhaps it's time to re-examine its "leaders".

It serves as a safety net for the poor. It would help the economy in general because it would boost consumer spending. Paying for it, as a start, would be by cuttitng our bloated defense budget. It could also replace any current welfare for the poor such as SNAP or TANF.

The most important thing about this concept is that it wouldn’t replace people having jobs. The goal of a UBI program should be alleviating poverty for anyone working 40 hours a week.

lol this is so stupid. Why is it so important that I specifically say what these metrics would be? Why would that somehow undermine the entire idea of it? You think you’re making some witty argument by demanding specific metrics but it wouldn’t matter. With any economic policy, right wing or left wing, someone has to decide on specific numbers. Imagine if you proposed we cut more taxes for the middle class and then someone says to you “by how much? For who? How long? How would the tax cut be paid for in other revenue sources?” Do you have those metrics figured out for any theoretical economic idea you have? No. You don’t. You wouldn’t play by the same rules. You just want me to throw out an amount and then say “well who would decide that?!” Idiot. ANY economic idea has to be measured with specific amounts.

You’re also further a moron with this incentive to work question. I already explained that the income amount would not be enough for people to quit their jobs. It would just be enough to help impoverished full time workers. They couldn’t survive on the UBI by itself.

You're complaining about digital surveillance while posting on the internet, fool. That ship sailed long ago, when the entire international banking system when online.

I'm more concerned about digital surveillance by the government to track women's periods and determine if they're going over state lines to get a legal abortion.

I'm concerned that a bunch of right wing theocrats have corrupted the US Supreme Court and are using it to establish laws to favour religious rights over civil rights. Enabling them to re-establish segregation and strip minorities and women of voting rights.
THIS JUST IN!!!
Free shit loving beggars want more free shit.
They also want 50 million illegal cockroaches and higher taxes for our best most productive citizens.
IMG_0223.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom