"Unity"

There's another current thread that uses the term "unity" but under a different context. So rather than derail that one, let's try one that is specific to the term itself.

In that thread and pretty much all threads here, the term "unity" is scoffed at and mocked. No surprise. Personally, given this country's present condition, I thought it was dumb when Biden tried to use it when he was first elected. We're just not close enough to it to even discuss it right now.

Anyway, here's what I'm wondering: Since so many here are pretty much on the other side of the fence from unity, what would "disunity" look like to you? My guess is that you want to "beat" the other side and impose your will on them (with specific laws and legislation, I guess) going forward. Is that correct?

So can anyone here go into detail on what "anti-unity" would look like, in practice, on a day-to-day basis? Think out of the box and lay it out. What is the goal here?

The only times our country has experienced unity was during times of extreme crisis.

9/11, Pearl Harbor, etc.

I have read a great deal about the early years of our republic and let me tell you, the disunity of those times make today seem like kumbaya.
 
Trying to help you... do you want to be wrong?... you won't last... you won't make it man... MAGA is in control for 12 years at least....
1000001548.webp
 
I wonder why no one wants to just answer the question.

Well, I can guess why not, but I'd rather wait.
~~~~~~
I just answered the question. Democrats will not allow 'Unity' within Congress. It's only when they are in the minority in Congress. When they are the majority they run roughshod over those of the minority. Ergo: Segregation. Racism, anti-Semitism, DEI, Lawfare, etcetera.,
 
~~~~~~
I just answered the question. Democrats will not allow 'Unity' within Congress. It's only when they are in the minority in Congress. When they are the majority they run roughshod over those of the minority. Ergo: Segregation. Racism, anti-Semitism, DEI, Lawfare, etcetera.,
You didn't understand the question.
 
~~~~~~
I just answered the question. Democrats will not allow 'Unity' within Congress. It's only when they are in the minority in Congress. When they are the majority they run roughshod over those of the minority. Ergo: Segregation. Racism, anti-Semitism, DEI, Lawfare, etcetera.,
 
~~~~~~
I just answered the question. Democrats will not allow 'Unity' within Congress. It's only when they are in the minority in Congress. When they are the majority they run roughshod over those of the minority. Ergo: Segregation. Racism, anti-Semitism, DEI, Lawfare, etcetera.,
That's not an answer. That's standard magaturd hyperbole and bilge.
 
You didn't understand the question.
It's not a very clear one. How are you defining unity? Agreeing to live peacefully, for the most part, in a society where differences of opinion are settled with legislation? Because that's mostly everyone.
 
It's not a very clear one. How are you defining unity? Agreeing to live peacefully, for the most part, in a society where differences of opinion are settled with legislation? Because that's mostly everyone.
I thought this was about disunity. Which I believe involves continuing to self segregate, violence and ill will towards fellow citizens and non citizens alike.
 
It's not a very clear one. How are you defining unity? Agreeing to live peacefully, for the most part, in a society where differences of opinion are settled with legislation?
That's where it goes wrong though. Most differences of opinion don't need to be "settled with legislation". And shouldn't be. That's the opposite of living peacefully. It's one group forcing their values on another.
 
I thought this was about disunity. Which I believe involves continuing to self segregate, violence and ill will towards fellow citizens and non citizens alike.
You don't self segregate? You have an open door policy at your house?
 
That's where it goes wrong though. Most differences of opinion don't need to be "settled with legislation". And shouldn't be. That's the opposite of living peacefully. It's one group forcing their values on another.
But that's just like your opinion, man.....


I don't see the sense in crying about which opinions are really important and who gets to have them. I just find those conversations hilariously ironic.
 
But that's just like your opinion, man.....


I don't see the sense in crying about which opinions are really important and who gets to have them. I just find those conversations hilariously ironic.
What??
 
Back
Top Bottom