Rambunctious
Diamond Member
- Jan 19, 2010
- 78,372
- 77,014
- 3,605
I don't need to explain anything to you.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't need to explain anything to you.
The only times our country has experienced unity was during times of extreme crisis.There's another current thread that uses the term "unity" but under a different context. So rather than derail that one, let's try one that is specific to the term itself.
In that thread and pretty much all threads here, the term "unity" is scoffed at and mocked. No surprise. Personally, given this country's present condition, I thought it was dumb when Biden tried to use it when he was first elected. We're just not close enough to it to even discuss it right now.
Anyway, here's what I'm wondering: Since so many here are pretty much on the other side of the fence from unity, what would "disunity" look like to you? My guess is that you want to "beat" the other side and impose your will on them (with specific laws and legislation, I guess) going forward. Is that correct?
So can anyone here go into detail on what "anti-unity" would look like, in practice, on a day-to-day basis? Think out of the box and lay it out. What is the goal here?
![]()
Americans Agree Nation Is Divided on Key Values
Eight in 10 Americans, a new high, perceive the U.S. as being greatly divided on the most important values.news.gallup.com
Trying to help you... do you want to be wrong?... you won't last... you won't make it man... MAGA is in control for 12 years at least....
See there you go... that wasn't so hard now was it?... nice hat...
That's you. You're too dumb to even suss out a clue.See there you go... that wasn't so hard now was it?... nice hat...
~~~~~~I wonder why no one wants to just answer the question.
Well, I can guess why not, but I'd rather wait.
You didn't understand the question.~~~~~~
I just answered the question. Democrats will not allow 'Unity' within Congress. It's only when they are in the minority in Congress. When they are the majority they run roughshod over those of the minority. Ergo: Segregation. Racism, anti-Semitism, DEI, Lawfare, etcetera.,
~~~~~~
I just answered the question. Democrats will not allow 'Unity' within Congress. It's only when they are in the minority in Congress. When they are the majority they run roughshod over those of the minority. Ergo: Segregation. Racism, anti-Semitism, DEI, Lawfare, etcetera.,
That's not an answer. That's standard magaturd hyperbole and bilge.~~~~~~
I just answered the question. Democrats will not allow 'Unity' within Congress. It's only when they are in the minority in Congress. When they are the majority they run roughshod over those of the minority. Ergo: Segregation. Racism, anti-Semitism, DEI, Lawfare, etcetera.,
It's not a very clear one. How are you defining unity? Agreeing to live peacefully, for the most part, in a society where differences of opinion are settled with legislation? Because that's mostly everyone.You didn't understand the question.
I thought this was about disunity. Which I believe involves continuing to self segregate, violence and ill will towards fellow citizens and non citizens alike.It's not a very clear one. How are you defining unity? Agreeing to live peacefully, for the most part, in a society where differences of opinion are settled with legislation? Because that's mostly everyone.
That's where it goes wrong though. Most differences of opinion don't need to be "settled with legislation". And shouldn't be. That's the opposite of living peacefully. It's one group forcing their values on another.It's not a very clear one. How are you defining unity? Agreeing to live peacefully, for the most part, in a society where differences of opinion are settled with legislation?
You don't self segregate? You have an open door policy at your house?I thought this was about disunity. Which I believe involves continuing to self segregate, violence and ill will towards fellow citizens and non citizens alike.
But that's just like your opinion, man.....That's where it goes wrong though. Most differences of opinion don't need to be "settled with legislation". And shouldn't be. That's the opposite of living peacefully. It's one group forcing their values on another.
Everyone self segregates. This isn't about me.You don't self segregate?
So what's it about? Human nature?Everyone self segregates. This isn't about me.
What??But that's just like your opinion, man.....
I don't see the sense in crying about which opinions are really important and who gets to have them. I just find those conversations hilariously ironic.
Quite likely.So what's it about? Human nature?
You gave me your opinion about what legislation is important, just like everyone else will. We all have an opinion about what's legislatively important.What??
So Mac is crying that humans are doing human shit?Quite likely.