Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is the road to depravity as we have seen, and why would Gaddafi or Assad be my enemy?
Well Gaddafi was a major sponsor of international terrorism until Reagan frightened him off by bombing Libya. And it's realpolitik. Sometimes you have to choose between the lesser of two evils when they aren't any good choices to be had.That is the road to depravity as we have seen, and why would Gaddafi or Assad be my enemy?
Was he? Gaddafi was a libyan nationalist, that;s why he was taken down, can't have them leaving the reservation can we?You should have asked them that.
Gaddafi is the one that supported terrorism and was behind multiple attacks on US citizens.
Muammar Qaddafi and Libya's Legacy of Terrorism | FRONTLINE
Attacks that the former Libyan leader is thought to have supported either directly or indirectly spanned more than two decades, multiple nations, and killed or injured countless innocent lives.www.pbs.org
You have a habit of ignoring the big Elephant in the Room, did you watch the vid i posted? Wesley Clark we are going to take out seven Countries in fife years.It wasn't a myth. Some of the boys died. Bashar al-Assad was asked about it in an hour long interview with Barbara Walter's. He said it wasn't him...he said it was the government. He appeared to be on Valium.
Bashar is not in charge. Mehr al Assad is running the show.
Are you familiar with Syrian history of sectarian strife and assassination? Goes back to the 1950s.
Wesley Clark is a crackpot. Is that where you get your information?You have a habit of ignoring the big Elephant in the Room, did you watch the vid i posted? Wesley Clark we are going to take out seven Countries in fife years.
LOL!! i am showing what the man said, most of the US leadership are crackpots that doesn't take away from what he said, you people are in a state of total denial.Wesley Clark is a crackpot. Is that where you get your information?
If you're a fan of Wesley Clark that explains everything.LOL!! i am showing what the man said, most of the US leadership are crackpots that doesn't take away from what he said, you people are in a state of total denial.
Why would i be a fan of Clark? i am just pointing out he let the cat out of the bag on US Imperialism.If you're a fan of Wesley Clark that explains everything.
Wesley Clark is a phony. He doesn't know anything about the middle east.Why would i be a fan of Clark? i am just pointing out he let the cat out of the bag on US Imperialism.
Was he? Gaddafi was a libyan nationalist, that;s why he was taken down, can't have them leaving the reservation can we?
What facts have i ignored?As typical, you ignore any facts you simply do not like and do not agree with your narrative.
And yes, he was. That has not been in doubt for decades.
Guys, this Gaddafi thing is boring already. Can we at last agree “taking him down” turned into a disaster for the people of Libya?
What facts have i ignored?
I don’t doubt that Gaddafi’s days may have been numbered, but I think that is hardly certain, and his son may have continued or even proved better. I’m no expert on Libyan society. The question is … did our intervention truly help? The old Monarchy also couldn’t last, and if Gaddafi had not seized power back in 1969 there were others in the military who would have. I certainly would have preferred a continuation of the basic rights proclaimed in the Idris Constitution … to Gaddafi’s crazy “Green Book” socialism.Point is that we didn't take Gaddafi down. There was no stopping what happened.
I don’t doubt that Gaddafi’s days may have been numbered, but I think that is hardly certain, and his son may have continued or even proved better. I’m no expert on Libyan society. The question is … did our intervention truly help? The old Monarchy also couldn’t last, and if Gaddafi had not seized power back in 1969 there were others in the military who would have. I certainly would have preferred a continuation of the basic rights proclaimed in the Idris Constitution … to Gaddafi’s “Green Book” socialism.
The real issue, I expect, was then what it is today. Who, which tribes or parties, which religious groups, which regions, which foreign powers with their competing companies, militia and even armies … will control Libyan oil wealth.
So who did the tooth fairy?Point is that we didn't take Gaddafi down. There was no stopping what happened.
The Libyans killed him. Have you ever lived in the middle east or north Africa?So who did the tooth fairy?
I doubt Libya had anything to do with Pan Am, there is no real evidence, but it was a political stance by the US at the time who had Libya in it's sights, it's more likely it involved Iran and the PFLPGC under George Habash retaliation for the US shooting down the Iranian airliner in the Gulf.That Gaddafi himself admitted he supported terrorism, and directed groups to attack the US and other countries.
Like Pan Am Flight 103, which killed 270 people over Scotland (259 in the air, 11 on the ground).
Libyans some Islamists Al Qaeda supported by the US and it's Nato vassals, i never lived in Nazi Germany but i know what went down thereThe Libyans killed him. Have you ever lived in the middle east or north Africa?
