Unfortunately, Liberal Keep Being Liberals

[GreenBean]

The notion that liberals are not Americans is probably the most retarded idea I've heard in my entire life. Get a life, chickie.

She's using a tactic popular with Lefties in that she has altered the definition of a word - in this case "American" to suit her needs for a particular preposition. She is basically stating that Liberals are "Un-American" . Most of what she had to say is too deep for you to comprehend ... I think "Special" people such as yourself should limit yourselves to conversations relative to spongebob and mickey mouse

For a girl that can't spell, I'd say your shoveling shit about Polivinylchic......

For a guy who has an avatar with its ass hanging out - I'll take your opinion for whats it worth ...lol

 

[Moonglow]

The notion that liberals are not Americans is probably the most retarded idea I've heard in my entire life. Get a life, chickie.

She's using a tactic popular with Lefties in that she has altered the definition of a word - in this case "American" to suit her needs for a particular preposition. She is basically stating that Liberals are "Un-American" . Most of what she had to say is too deep for you to comprehend ... I think "Special" people such as yourself should limit yourselves to conversations relative to spongebob and mickey mouse

For a girl that can't spell, I'd say your shoveling shit about Polivinylchic......

For a guy who has an avatar with its ass hanging out - I'll take your opinion for whats it worth ...lol

Some can adjust, other sublimate....

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Evidence of the fascism present throughout the US University System:

"Whiteness is a form of racial oppression. The question is, that it is somehow possible to separate whiteness from oppression. It is not. There can be no ". "There can be no white race, without the phenomenon of 'white supremacy'." Professor Noel Ignatiev. ~ 14 minutes into the above evidenced video: Indoctrinate-U.

 

[GreenBean]

The notion that liberals are not Americans is probably the most retarded idea I've heard in my entire life. Get a life, chickie.

She's using a tactic popular with Lefties in that she has altered the definition of a word - in this case "American" to suit her needs for a particular preposition. She is basically stating that Liberals are "Un-American" . Most of what she had to say is too deep for you to comprehend ... I think "Special" people such as yourself should limit yourselves to conversations relative to spongebob and mickey mouse

For a girl that can't spell, I'd say your shoveling shit about Polivinylchic......

For a guy who has an avatar with its ass hanging out - I'll take your opinion for whats it worth ...lol

Some can adjust, other sublimate....

Sorry Bart - the only purpose I see for you hanging your ass out is for me to stick my boot up it at a very high velocity

 

[Nyvin]

Pretty much all of PoliticalChic's threads can be summed as:

"Demonize, Demonize, DEMONIZE!!!"

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I'm trying to debate you on the facts of the issue.

LOL! Seriously?

To be representative of liberalism in general, an action would have to be characteristic of most liberals' actions in the same scenario on the same issue.

Prove that, please.

ROFLMNAO! You're seeking evidence of characteristics in US Academia, which reasonably sustain the premise that such is liberal; which is to say mired in the counter-cultural morass of Left-think?

Here ya go: brace yourself...

"Indoctrinate-U"

Wow.

"...SILENCE PEOPLE WITH ALTERNATIVE IDEAS...."
The film......makes one want to cry.

Where has America gone?

It's still here, but as in life so goes society, once you leave, you can never go back, or, the more things change, the more they stay the same..Well, now there is a tidbit of non-liberal philosophy for you to squander...like the tree that made no noise as it hit the ground, since no one was around to hear it.....

Except, we were around to hear it... as we watched, listened and experienced it, contesting it every step, even as we tolerated and compromised with it, as a means to appease it.

Sadly... it turns out that what we were looking at was EVIL... and we didn't fully understand that. Thus we thought that because it was expressed in human form that it was inherently reasonable, thus that we could reason with it. HUGE mistake on our part. HUuuge mistake.

 

[GreenBean]

Evidence of the fascism present throughout the US University System:

"Whiteness is a form of racial oppression. The question is, that it is somehow possible to separate whiteness from oppression. It is not. There can be no ". "There can be no white race, without the phenomenon of 'white supremacy'." Professor Noel Ignatiev. ~ 14 minutes into the above evidenced video: Indoctrinate-U.

The tunnel of oppression ,is a freshman orientation program that has been adopted at most major colleges and universities and required of new students as part of their freshman experience. Students are taught about the evils of white privilege, and rape culture and are forced to discuss their sexuality with total strangers before they attend their first class. It is basically a sanitizing session, to delouse the incoming inmates lest the poor professors have to deal with unindoctrinated people from the real world.

Paid Resident advisers are on staff, at public expense of course, to facilitate the students on their path to indoctrination and reinforce predetermined conclusions, in support of Liberal-Progressive ideology. Resident advisers are somewhat reminiscent of the Party commissar of that last great "failed social experiment" Russian Communism. To qualify as a Resident Adviser, you must be thoroughly indoctrinated in the racist, feminist, sexist, socialist, class-warfare ideology of Liberal Progressivism.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Pretty much all of PoliticalChic's threads can be summed as:

"Demonize, Demonize, DEMONIZE!!!"

So you're cool with demonization... as demonstrated by the Left. But discussion OF THAT... presenting evidence OF Demons... THAT you have a problem with?

 

[Moonglow]

The notion that liberals are not Americans is probably the most retarded idea I've heard in my entire life. Get a life, chickie.

She's using a tactic popular with Lefties in that she has altered the definition of a word - in this case "American" to suit her needs for a particular preposition. She is basically stating that Liberals are "Un-American" . Most of what she had to say is too deep for you to comprehend ... I think "Special" people such as yourself should limit yourselves to conversations relative to spongebob and mickey mouse

For a girl that can't spell, I'd say your shoveling shit about Polivinylchic......

For a guy who has an avatar with its ass hanging out - I'll take your opinion for whats it worth ...lol

Some can adjust, other sublimate....

Sorry Bart - the only purpose I see for you hanging your ass out is for me to stick my boot up it at a very high velocity

Since you've not been around the block, I'll give you a map to the stars and let you understand that before the software change at USMB, Bart pulled his pants down to Moon people, since Bart, being the impish kid in some of us is not looking for your jackboot gay thug BDSM antics.....you may carry on...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pretty much all of PoliticalChic's threads can be summed as:

"Demonize, Demonize, DEMONIZE!!!"

Well, in the case of Liberals, that is neither difficult nor untrue.


"Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement....Beyond that, conservatives represent a distinct minority on college and university campuses."
Survey shocker Liberal profs admit they d discriminate against conservatives in hiring advancement - Washington Times

 

[Moonglow]

Evidence of the fascism present throughout the US University System:

"Whiteness is a form of racial oppression. The question is, that it is somehow possible to separate whiteness from oppression. It is not. There can be no ". "There can be no white race, without the phenomenon of 'white supremacy'." Professor Noel Ignatiev. ~ 14 minutes into the above evidenced video: Indoctrinate-U.

The tunnel of oppression ,is a freshman orientation program that has been adopted at most major colleges and universities and required of new students as part of their freshman experience. Students are taught about the evils of white privilege, and rape culture and are forced to discuss their sexuality with total strangers before they attend their first class. It is basically a sanitizing session, to delouse the incoming inmates lest the poor professors have to deal with unindoctrinated people from the real world.

Paid Resident advisers are on staff, at public expense of course, to facilitate the students on their path to indoctrination and reinforce predetermined conclusions, in support of Liberal-Progressive ideology. Resident advisers are somewhat reminiscent of the Party commissar of that last great "failed social experiment" Russian Communism. To qualify as a Resident Adviser, you must be thoroughly indoctrinated in the racist, feminist, sexist, socialist, class-warfare ideology of Liberal Progressivism.

What is the name of the class as if you were wanting to take such class, if you have ever been to college or university you'd know..Why does the story writer leave out evidence of these classes and their description given from the college website or cataloge?

socialist, class-warfare ideology of Liberal Progressivism

One does not win debates by showing poor grammar and spelling skills.....

 

[Mad_Cabbie]

Once again - definitions - see my signature quote from PJ Orouke which will give you a more correct understanding of how she is defining "Liberal"

“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

I was a spoiled child? Really? I grew up VERY poor and severely mentally Ill; how in the hell is that "spoiled???"

I sat in my house too ill to attend school, while I watched the world move along without me ... I don't mind ONE BIT, because it taught me to understand human suffering and made me a much more in-tuned and sympathetic person.

Ill-disciplined??? I taught myself Spanish, American Sign, plumbing, music, voice and I have ALWAYS held down a job without ever ONCE taking a dime of unemployment.

Unsatisfied? No, I'm exceedingly happy with my life and do not ever blame anyone else for my short-comings.

Useless? I have not put a car in the shop since the early nineties as I do, not only all my own car repairs, but my own home repairs as well.

I have given hospice care to friends and family, offered free rides to people who could not pay, helped my neighbors who were to sick to shovel their own drive ways ... Jesus, do you ever use the brain that the good lord gave you?

 

[Ava]

And per the title....that means not being Americans.


Seems to raise hackles when I point out that Liberalism is simply one more iteration of the totalitarian political persuasion.
And, yes, I do mean that Liberalism belongs in the same family with communism, socialism, Nazism, etc.

And no, I don't mean that Liberalism is about gulags and concentration camps, FDR's efforts toward the Japanese notwithstanding, because the American version is suffused through, and extenuated by, America's history.



"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’"
Jonah Goldberg

Modern Liberalism is not guided by such American concepts as unalienable rights.
Liberalism, and institutions pervaded by its tenets, accept the silencing of those with opposing views.

Yes, they do.
Most especially universities, the monasteries of Liberalism....as you will find below.




1. " Marquette Philosophy Instructor: “Gay Rights” Can’t Be Discussed in Class Since Any Disagreement Would Offend Gay Students

2. A student ... in a philosophy class (“Theory of Ethics”), and the instructor (one Cheryl Abbate) was attempting to apply a philosophical text to modern political controversies. ...She listed some issues on the board, and came to “gay rights.”

She then airily said that “everybody agrees on this, and there is no need to discuss it.”




3. The student, a conservative who disagrees with some of the gay lobby’s notions of “gay rights” (such as gay marriage).... told Abbate that if she dismisses an entire argument because of her personal views, that sets a terrible precedent for the class.

4. The student argued against gay marriage and gay adoption, ... Abbate made some plausible arguments to the student — pointing out that single people can adopt a child, so why not a gay couple? She even asked the student for research showing that children of gay parents do worse than children of straight, married parents. The student said he would provide it.

5. Abbate explained that “some opinions are not appropriate, such as racist opinions, sexist opinions” and then went on to ask “do you know if anyone in your class is homosexual?” And further “don’t you think it would be offensive to them” if some student raised his hand and challenged gay marriage?

The point being, apparently that any gay classmates should not be subjected to hearing any disagreement with their presumed policy views.





6. .... as the student said that it was his right as an American citizen to make arguments against gay marriage. Abbate replied that “you don’t have a right in this class to make homophobic comments.”

She further said she would “take offense” if the student said that women can’t serve in particular roles. And she added that somebody who is homosexual would experience similar offense if somebody opposed gay marriage in class.

She went on “In this class, homophobic comments, racist comments, will not be tolerated.”

She then invited the student to drop the class."
Marquette Warrior Marquette Philosophy Instructor Gay Rights Can t Be Discussed in Class Since Any Disagreement Would Offend Gay Students

Liberalism is what the United States of America was founded on. We are liberals to varying degrees.

maybe you need to take a few adult education classes?

The modern term 'Liberal' was stolen by communist John Dewey...he changed 'Socialist' to Liberal.

But you know that, don't you.


The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government....conservative principles.

'Fess up.

AKA Classical Liberals.

 

[GreenBean]

Once again - definitions - see my signature quote from PJ Orouke which will give you a more correct understanding of how she is defining "Liberal"

“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.”

I was a spoiled child? Really? I grew up VERY poor and severely mentally Ill; how in the hell is that "spoiled???"

I sat in my house too ill to attend school, while I watched the world move along without me ... I don't mind ONE BIT, because it taught me to understand human suffering and made me a much more in-tuned and sympathetic person.

Ill-disciplined??? I taught myself Spanish, American Sign, plumbing, music, voice and I have ALWAYS held down a job without ever ONCE taking a dime of unemployment.

Unsatisfied? No, I'm exceedingly happy with my life and do not ever blame anyone else for my short-comings.

Useless? I have not put a car in the shop since the early nineties as I do, not only all my own car repairs, but my own home repairs as well.

I have given hospice care to friends and family, offered free rides to people who could not pay, helped my neighbors who were to sick to shovel their own drive ways ... Jesus, do you ever use the brain that the good lord gave you?

I was a spoiled child? Really? I grew up ....severely mentally Ill; how in the hell is that "spoiled???"

And apparently you still are Mentally ill .

I grew up VERY poor ...how in the hell is that "spoiled???

Poverty is a relative concept and is not necessarily relative to how spoiled a brat is - capice brat ?

Unsatisfied? No, I'm exceedingly happy with my life and do not ever blame anyone else for my short-comings.

That would be way too much blame to assign - but based on your past posts it is apparent that you blame society for everything that doesn't go exactly as your warped sense of self worth dictates. You are not as hopeless as many libtards - but you're still a "Brat"

So far as the rest of your post ...lol ... yes - i am certain in my diagnosis that the mental illness which afflicted you in your childhood has not diminished - but has steadfastly grown with you - there's no hope for people like you - just stiock your thumb back in your mouth [That is your thumb isn't it ?] , sit in a corner , choke your chicken and STFU.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Comments about everything except the point: Liberals are out to prevent any discussion or debate about their dictums.
Afraid to draw the obvious conclusion that Liberals like nothing better than censoring opposing views.....and no where is this less appropriate than in universities???

The professor is a douchebag.

However, do you have anything other than anecdotes to conclude that liberals broadly don't want any discussion or debate about their beliefs such that any reasonable person would conclude that they are tantamount to Nazis or communists?

I'm trying to differentiate the professor's over-reaction and yours. I'm not seeing any.

"I'm not seeing any."

I'm responsible for what I post, not for the lack of comprehension you evince, as a result of your biases.

The professor is both courageous and correct.
In the thread, I've given not only the case of the university employee forbidding any exchange of opinion beyond that advanced by the Liberal agenda, but included the administration of the university taking the very livelihood of anyone....the professor....who dares to make the Liberal fascism known.

But...in the vain hope that yours was an honest post.....I will post more on this case.

Why not make the thread about ONE individual who happened to do this, instead of making a wholly indefensible argument that this one individual's actions are representative of liberalism in general?

Because the actions highlighted in the OP are representative of liberalism in general.

True story.

And the shoe fit....that's why you're squealing like a stuck pig.

I'm trying to debate you on the facts of the issue.

To be representative of liberalism in general, an action would have to be characteristic of most liberals' actions in the same scenario on the same issue.

Prove that, please.

" [Steve] Hinkle attempted to post a flier in the common area of the campus Multicultural Center that advertised a speech by Mason Weaver, author of the book It’s OK to Leave the Plantation. Weaver argues that dependence on government puts many African Americans in circumstances similar to slavery. The flier displayed only the title of the book, the time and place of the event, and a picture of the author. Several students at the Multicultural Center objected that the poster was “offensive.” Hinkle offered to discuss the flier, but to no avail. After he left, a student called the university police, whose official report stated that officers had responded to complaints about “a suspicious white male passing out literature of an offensive racial nature.

The Cal Poly Judicial Affairs Office, after a seven-hour hearing in February 2003, found Hinkle guilty of “disruption of a campus event,” as several students in the Multicultural Center public area claimed that they were having a meeting at the time, although no sign, announcement, or record of that event existed. For engaging in constitutionally protected expression, he was ordered to write letters of apology to the offended students. Failure to do so could lead to severe disciplinary penalties. .... Cal Poly President Warren Baker and, after the university refused to restore Hinkle’s rights,...."
Major Victory for Free Speech at Cal Poly FIRE


Liberals inhibiting free speech and restrictions of opinions not authentically Liberal....proven.

 

[GreenBean]

conservatives finished the year angry about the same thing they were angry about at the beginning of the year: liberal double standards.

As I write this, GOP House whip Steve Scalise is in hot water over reports that he spoke to a group of racist poltroons in Louisiana twelve years ago. Whether it was an honest mistake, as Scalise plausibly claims, or a sign of something more nefarious, as his detractors hope, remains to be seen.

But one common response on social media is instructive. Countless conservatives want to know: Why the double standard? Barack Obama was friends with a domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers. His spiritual mentor was a vitriolic racist, Jeremiah Wright. One of his administration’s closest advisers and allies is Al Sharpton, a man who has inspired enough racial violence to make a grand dragon’s white sheets

Meanwhile, the Democratic party venerated the late senator Robert Byrd, a former Klansmen himself. He was one of 19 senators (all Democrats) to sign the Southern Manifesto opposing integration. One of his co-signers was William Fulbright, Bill Clinton’s mentor.

When Republicans are in power, “dissent is the highest form of patriotism.” When Democrats are in power, dissent is the racist fuming of “angry white men.”

Peaceful, law-abiding tea-party groups who cleaned up after their protests — and got legal permits for them — were signs of nascent fascism lurking in the American soul. Violent, anarchic, and illegal protests by Occupy Wall Street a few years ago or, more recently, in Ferguson, Mo., were proof that a new idealistic generation was renewing its commitment to idealism.

When rich conservatives give money to Republicans, it is a sign that the whole system has been corrupted by fat cats. When it is revealed that liberal billionaires and left-wing super PACs outspent conservative groups in 2014: crickets.

When Republicans invoke God or religious faith as an inspiration for their political views, it’s threatening and creepy. When Democrats do it, it’s a sign they believe in social justice.

One can do this all day long. But while examples are easy, explanations are hard.

I don’t know who first said, “Behind every apparent double standard lies an unconfessed single standard” (and as far as I can tell, neither does the Internet), but whoever did was onto something.

What looks like inexplicably staggering hypocrisy from the conservative perspective is actually remarkably consistent from the liberal perspective.

Well, “perspective” is probably the wrong word because it implies a conscious, deliberate, philosophical point of view. What is really at work is better understood as bias, even bigotry.

If you work from the dogmatic assumption that liberalism is morally infallible and that liberals are, by definition, pitted against sinister and — more importantly — powerful forces, then it’s easy to explain away what seem like double standards. Any lapse, error, or transgression by conservatives is evidence of their real nature, while similar lapses, errors, and transgressions by liberals are trivial when balanced against the fact that their hearts are in the right place.

Despite controlling the commanding heights of the culture — journalism, Hollywood, the arts, academia, and vast swaths of the corporate America they denounce — liberals have convinced themselves they are pitted against deeply entrenched powerful forces and that being a liberal is somehow brave. Obama, the twice-elected president of the United States, to this day speaks as if he’s some kind of underdog.

Frank Rich, the former New York Times columnist and theater critic, recently interviewed Chris Rock for New York magazine. He wanted to know why right-leaning comedian Dennis Miller isn’t as funny (at least according to Rich) as Jon Stewart of The Daily Show. He asked Rock, “Do you think that identifying with those in power is an impediment to laughter?”

It was a hilarious and revealing moment. Stewart — who recently had to turn down a pleading request from NBC to take over Meet the Press — has long identified with liberals in power. Moreover, he’s easily one of America’s most powerful liberals, routinely creating and enforcing liberal conventional wisdom (much as Rich had done from his perch at the Times). Miller, meanwhile, has nowhere near the same cultural clout precisely because he doesn’t affirm the single standard at the heart of liberalism: “We’re the good guys.”

A Year of Liberal Double Standards National Review Online

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Say whatever you like kiddos but if you lose your job or your life falls apart because of it, that is the price to be paid for shooting your mouth off. Free Speech can be very expensive.

 

[GreenBean]

Evidence of the fascism present throughout the US University System:

"Whiteness is a form of racial oppression. The question is, that it is somehow possible to separate whiteness from oppression. It is not. There can be no ". "There can be no white race, without the phenomenon of 'white supremacy'." Professor Noel Ignatiev. ~ 14 minutes into the above evidenced video: Indoctrinate-U.

The tunnel of oppression ,is a freshman orientation program that has been adopted at most major colleges and universities and required of new students as part of their freshman experience. Students are taught about the evils of white privilege, and rape culture and are forced to discuss their sexuality with total strangers before they attend their first class. It is basically a sanitizing session, to delouse the incoming inmates lest the poor professors have to deal with unindoctrinated people from the real world.

Paid Resident advisers are on staff, at public expense of course, to facilitate the students on their path to indoctrination and reinforce predetermined conclusions, in support of Liberal-Progressive ideology. Resident advisers are somewhat reminiscent of the Party commissar of that last great "failed social experiment" Russian Communism. To qualify as a Resident Adviser, you must be thoroughly indoctrinated in the racist, feminist, sexist, socialist, class-warfare ideology of Liberal Progressivism.

What is the name of the class as if you were wanting to take such class, if you have ever been to college or university you'd know..Why does the story writer leave out evidence of these classes and their description given from the college website or cataloge?

socialist, class-warfare ideology of Liberal Progressivism

One does not win debates by showing poor grammar and spelling skills.....

..Why does the story writer leave out evidence of these classes and their description given from the college website or cataloge?

White Guilt/privilege is a concept taught ion almost every major College/University throughout the land - if you are unfamiliar with it - kindly educate yourself little fella - for at your present level of knowledge you are wholly unqualified to discuss/debate this topic.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Say whatever you like kiddos but if you lose your job or your life falls apart because of it, that is the price to be paid for shooting your mouth off. Free Speech can be very expensive.

Free Speech can be very expensive in a dictatorship.
Thanks, Liberals.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Say whatever you like kiddos but if you lose your job or your life falls apart because of it, that is the price to be paid for shooting your mouth off. Free Speech can be very expensive.

Free Speech can be very expensive in a dictatorship.
Thanks, Liberals.

Liberals gave you Free Speech, but we never said there wouldn't be a price to be paid.