Unemployment Rises to 6.2%

I actually have respect for pingy when we disagree. You, not so much.

You should respect him, he's exposed you and made a complete fool out of you in this thread.

So, will you be answering his questions? (yes, we know you can't and won't)
 
Funny seeing pinqy own boedicca and econchic. All they know what to come back with is insults. That's how you know they don't know what they are talking about.

I'm not surprised you don't know substance when you see it. The big picture requires possessing a lot of brain cells folks like you don't have.

We have the big picture. You and your friends are swimming down in data you can't even understand the meaning of.

One thing I've noticed about you is that you use a lot of words to say nothing
 
It means he has a bias. Everyone has a bias. Just that some know it and others don't. Those who think they don't are the biggest idiots of all.
Translation: you cannot argue facts or numbers so can only lean on saying everyone has a bias, asking their education, saying they need to see the big picture, etc.

I don't think I've seen one concrete argument come out of your mouth, and to me it indicates you are phony.

You don't get it. Everyone is biased but her and those who agree with her.
 
you mean the civilian noninstitutional population?
Table A-1. Employment status of the civilian population by sex and age
the one where the population in June 2014 was 247,814,000 and in July 2014 was 245,756,000 for a DECREASE of 2,058,000? .
Look at the chart again. June 2014 was indeed 247,814,000 but July 2014 was 248,023,000. An increase of 209,000

July 2013 was 245,756,000


Wow, you are an idiot.

Here is what I posted AGAIN:

The civilian population increased by 209K, and jobs increased by 209K....a sign of an anemic economy which can barely create enough jobs to keep up with population growth.
Except population growth isn't keeping up with Boomer retirement!!!! And if we cut back on immigration, as the Right wants to do, it will only get worse!
 
econchick clearly doesn't understand the data and has no idea of what is going to happen.
 
Look at the chart again. June 2014 was indeed 247,814,000 but July 2014 was 248,023,000. An increase of 209,000

July 2013 was 245,756,000


Wow, you are an idiot.

Here is what I posted AGAIN:

The civilian population increased by 209K, and jobs increased by 209K....a sign of an anemic economy which can barely create enough jobs to keep up with population growth.
Except population growth isn't keeping up with Boomer retirement!!!! And if we cut back on immigration, as the Right wants to do, it will only get worse!


Boomer retirement is a minor factor. The bigger issue is high unemployment among prime working age men and young people (especially black and hispanic young men).
 
Wow, you are an idiot.

Here is what I posted AGAIN:

The civilian population increased by 209K, and jobs increased by 209K....a sign of an anemic economy which can barely create enough jobs to keep up with population growth.
Except population growth isn't keeping up with Boomer retirement!!!! And if we cut back on immigration, as the Right wants to do, it will only get worse!


Boomer retirement is a minor factor. The bigger issue is high unemployment among prime working age men and young people (especially black and hispanic young men).

Minor?... yapping about something and you have no idea what you're yapping about ..

Baby Boomers Are Retiring - Business Insider


Subtract that 6.544 million still in the labor force from the 15.619 million who made the shift from the first bucket to the second bucket and you get 9.075 million people 55 years of age or over who have left the labor force over the past six years
 
Last edited:
LOL, no nitwit, I'm used to doing algorithms that stretch from one side of the board to the other but I didn't want to intimidate the linear thinkers like you so I tried to keep it simple enough for even you to understand.
I doubt it, I smell a phony. You spend far too much effort trying to prop yourself up (like above post) instead of actually engaging what others say.

All I've seen from you is you believing junior high algebra is complex math. And trust me nothing you've done on any board with equations is too complex for me to understand, Ms. Phony.


I can always count on you to infer the wrong thing from my very big picture points. That's why I have to talk in your baby speak.
Clearly you talk with only one purpose: to avoid having to actually prove anything you say or disprove anything anyone else says.

Still waiting on you answering Pinqy, and yes we all know you can't and won't.

You're right. It's not for me. I was talking about you libs that pretend you understand economics. Bunch of linear thinkers for sure.

And yes, Merc Boy, there's plenty you don't understand.
 
econchick clearly doesn't understand the data and has no idea of what is going to happen.

Except everything I've predicted on this Board so far has been correct. Hell, I don't even stop with economics. PBS did a piece on Obummer about Iraq. It was exactly what I said happened.

Now do I expect small brains like yours, Mercs, Sieste or whatever the hell his name is...to grasp it, no. I expect you to keep talking about pissants while I talk about elephants.
 
Gee, Dow RECOVERED to only DOWN 70 points today.... That's also Bush's fault! ROTFLMFAO!

Hey V! It's been fun getting to see how small the lib brains are on the econ threads. I'm so entertained that it's hard to pull myself away and go see other threads.

I mean I've never seen so many lobotomized people in one group. They are truly a piece of work.

They couldn't think strategically if their lives depended on it, LOL.:eek:

Thank God they only represent about 20% of the country now.
 
Liberals would cry if there was zero unemployment...then all of them would have to have a job.
 
Unemployment Rises to 6.2%

Which is very good news, reflecting the fact that those who gave up looking for work have now returned to the job market seeking employment as a result of sustained job growth and a strong economic recovery.
 
15th post
Like I said earlier, there are a lot of Keynsian trained people that don't know they don't know. Where'd you go to school?
Hah hah perfect and easily predicted.

He didn't ask you your opinion on training, he asked you:
But please, educate me: explain the ways someone enters or leaves the categories of labor force and not in the labor force and how being not in the labor force only means leaving the labor force.

You won't answer it because you don't have a clue.

Why would he ask me moron? I wasn't having the discussion with him; Boedicca was.

Can't you get even the simplest thing right? What's wrong....did I hurt you liddle widdle feeeelings Merc Boy.

Btw, you never answered where you went to school. I'm assuming it was some online degree. Not that that's bad in some cases. But you're just not sharp at all.
 
Unemployment Rises to 6.2%

Which is very good news, reflecting the fact that those who gave up looking for work have now returned to the job market seeking employment as a result of sustained job growth and a strong economic recovery.

That's just one small part of the formula.

And I notice how all of a sudden people talk about the Labor Partic Rate when the rate goes up, but no one, especially liberals, are loathe to mention that when the rate's going down.

Sorry, can't have it both ways.
 
I do not feel an economy should rise and fall based on government spending. Let the free market formula work.
 
Funny seeing pinqy own boedicca and econchic. All they know what to come back with is insults. That's how you know they don't know what they are talking about.

I'm not surprised you don't know substance when you see it. The big picture requires possessing a lot of brain cells folks like you don't have.

We have the big picture. You and your friends are swimming down in data you can't even understand the meaning of.

One thing I've noticed about you is that you use a lot of words to say nothing

But it's funny how I'm always spot on. You know what's funny about you? You're completely incapable of thinking conceptually.

Understand what I mean by that?

I didn't think so.
 
Back
Top Bottom