Unemployment Rises to 6.2%

[Siete]

Funny seeing pinqy own boedicca and econchic. All they know what to come back with is insults. That's how you know they don't know what they are talking about.

and they're still at it. TFF !

 

[EconChick]

read this to me, you wrote it

And anyone with a full brain (unlike you and your wee half brain) knows that an Executive Branch that refuses to enforce the Rule of Law and instead rules by the Whim of Bureaucrats dampens economic activity
...

and you're saying by not enforcing the law of the land the Executive Branch dampens the economy thus having the ability to control the stock market ... yes or no ?

I have no idea how you infer that. Wait, yes I do. You don't understand how a market economy works.

prolly because I didn't infer that ... your stupid sister boedicca-duh actually TYPED that.


next question..

when are you going to pack up your ass that continually gets handed back to you and stfu?

Why would I shut up, LMAO. Didn't you see my thread about the Dow dropping 317 yesterday and what that meant??? Was right on the money dimwit.

And guess what happened today? It dropped for the fourth day in a row. I know, I know, you're gonna think I'm talking about the number it dropped by...and fail to grasp what it's telling us.

Like I keep saying, lib policies are a mess.

The signal the Dow is sending is that they are losing confidence in the Fed.

Hell, I lost it a long time ago, but some people take a long time to grasp things.

Hell, I bet you don't even know what I'm talking about.

Don't you have some Legos to play with or something?

 

[SteadyMercury]

I have never seen you point out anything I've gotten wrong. Mostly you just sling insults.

I haven't seen much substance from EconChick either, seems to only have a standard fallback of saying people can't see the big picture, which I'm pretty sure is a sign of being unable to support her position.

Plus anyone who types in junior high algebra as an example of the complex math she's capable of is pretty suspect in the intelligence and qualifications department, I suspect she vastly overrates her capabilities and brainpower.

 

[pinqy]

All you've done is proven my assertion that job creation is barely keeping up with population growth and no making a dent in the un&underemployed-given up population.

But you said I showed math illiteracy. So I got the numbers wrong which agrees with what you say? hmmmm

You consistently demonstrate that you don't understand them.

But thanks for playing.

Really? Odd all those years I was paid to explain them.
But please, educate me: explain the ways someone enters or leaves the categories of labor force and not in the labor force and how being not in the labor force only means leaving the labor force.

So far you've only asserted I'm wrong without even attempting to say what I'm wrong about.

 

[EconChick]

The one tenth of a percentage point increase in the unemployment rate to 6.2 percent came as more people entered the labor market, a sign of confidence in the job market.[/U][/B]

are you really trying to spin this as bad news?

LOL, people entered the workforce and couldn't find jobs, I see why you say that isn't bad. OK, I don't...

We need government to stop counting a bunch of unemployed people again to get the rate back down, don't we?

Hey Kaz!

Btw, I like how many smart chicks there are on this Board. (I hope you're a chick, LOL.) It makes me smile that most of the women that hang out on this Board are really smart chicks that see the big picture. Lots of smart guys too, but I pretty much see a lot of fiscal conservative chicks...love it.

 

[SteadyMercury]

Really? Odd all those years I was paid to explain them.
But please, educate me: explain the ways someone enters or leaves the categories of labor force and not in the labor force and how being not in the labor force only means leaving the labor force.

So far you've only asserted I'm wrong without even attempting to say what I'm wrong about.

Good luck with getting a response to that, prepare for vague reference to how you can't grasp what she's been saying instead of any sort of concrete response

 

[boedicca]

pinqy:

If you really were paid to explain them, then you don't need me to tell you how it works, bub.

The basic MATH is that the number of people who are un and under employed, and who have given up has increased. Job creation is barely keeping up with population growth. If you think over 100M people in such a sorry state is progress, then you are one sick freak.

 

[EconChick]

But you said I showed math illiteracy. So I got the numbers wrong which agrees with what you say? hmmmm

You consistently demonstrate that you don't understand them.

But thanks for playing.

Really? Odd all those years I was paid to explain them.
But please, educate me: explain the ways someone enters or leaves the categories of labor force and not in the labor force and how being not in the labor force only means leaving the labor force.

So far you've only asserted I'm wrong without even attempting to say what I'm wrong about.

Like I said earlier, there are a lot of Keynsian trained people that don't know they don't know. Where'd you go to school?

 

[EconChick]

pinqy:

If you really were paid to explain them, then you don't need me to tell you how it works, bub.

The basic math is that the number of people who are un and under employed, and who have given up has increased. Job creation is barely keeping up with population growth. If you think over 100m people in such a sorry state is progress, then you are one sick freak.

Snap!

 

[boedicca]

You consistently demonstrate that you don't understand them.

But thanks for playing.

Really? Odd all those years I was paid to explain them.
But please, educate me: explain the ways someone enters or leaves the categories of labor force and not in the labor force and how being not in the labor force only means leaving the labor force.

So far you've only asserted I'm wrong without even attempting to say what I'm wrong about.

Like I said earlier, there are a lot of Keynsian trained people that don't know they don't know. Where'd you go to school?

Well, even if he went to an Elite Ivy League Institution:

[ame=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peRUTroIuNs].[/ame]

 

[SteadyMercury]

Like I said earlier, there are a lot of Keynsian trained people that don't know they don't know. Where'd you go to school?

Hah hah perfect and easily predicted.

He didn't ask you your opinion on training, he asked you:

But please, educate me: explain the ways someone enters or leaves the categories of labor force and not in the labor force and how being not in the labor force only means leaving the labor force.

You won't answer it because you don't have a clue.

 

[EconChick]

Really? Odd all those years I was paid to explain them.
But please, educate me: explain the ways someone enters or leaves the categories of labor force and not in the labor force and how being not in the labor force only means leaving the labor force.

So far you've only asserted I'm wrong without even attempting to say what I'm wrong about.

Like I said earlier, there are a lot of Keynsian trained people that don't know they don't know. Where'd you go to school?

Well, even if he went to an Elite Ivy League Institution:

[ame=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peRUTroIuNs].[/ame]

Right on, right on. Ivy Leagues are where Keynsians congregate the most! Dumb ass liberals who love to spend spend SPEND.

 

[EconChick]

Like I said earlier, there are a lot of Keynsian trained people that don't know they don't know. Where'd you go to school?

Hah hah perfect and easily predicted.

He didn't ask you your opinion on training, he asked you:

But please, educate me: explain the ways someone enters or leaves the categories of labor force and not in the labor force and how being not in the labor force only means leaving the labor force.

You won't answer it because you don't have a clue.

If you're finished eating your Gerber Baby Food I'll spell it out for ya.

It means he has a bias. Everyone has a bias. Just that some know it and others don't. Those who think they don't are the biggest idiots of all.

 

[pinqy]

Oh but come on, B, don't you know that pingy is the objective number cruncher here?

LOL, there is no such thing for starters and secondly he's full of shit half the time.

I have never seen you point out anything I've gotten wrong. Mostly you just sling insults. And again, I wasn't even addressing Boudicca and my post had nothing to do with her.

What you get wrong is what the data means.

Oh? What have I said that's wrong? I don't recall ascribing any meaning beyond statements of fact.

 

[SteadyMercury]

It means he has a bias. Everyone has a bias. Just that some know it and others don't. Those who think they don't are the biggest idiots of all.

Translation: you cannot argue facts or numbers so can only lean on saying everyone has a bias, asking their education, saying they need to see the big picture, etc.

I don't think I've seen one concrete argument come out of your mouth, and to me it indicates you are phony.

 

[SteadyMercury]

Should have named yourself DodgeChick, for the hilarious way you avoid proving your chops by backing up anything you say.

 

[EconChick]

I have never seen you point out anything I've gotten wrong. Mostly you just sling insults.

I haven't seen much substance from EconChick either, seems to only have a standard fallback of saying people can't see the big picture, which I'm pretty sure is a sign of being unable to support her position.

Plus anyone who types in junior high algebra as an example of the complex math she's capable of is pretty suspect in the intelligence and qualifications department, I suspect she vastly overrates her capabilities and brainpower.

LOL, no nitwit, I'm used to doing algorithms that stretch from one side of the board to the other but I didn't want to intimidate the linear thinkers like you so I tried to keep it simple enough for even you to understand.

I can always count on you to infer the wrong thing from my very big picture points. That's why I have to talk in your baby speak.

 

[EconChick]

Should have named yourself DodgeChick, for the hilarious way you avoid proving your chops by backing up anything you say.

You're small brained enough to think arguing down in the weeds proves anything to anyone. Those numbers mean nothing without context...and they mean nothing unless you little number boys tell me what it's doing for the overall economy.

And you can't.

I on the other hand keep giving the big picture assessments....and they keep happening.

 

[EconChick]

It means he has a bias. Everyone has a bias. Just that some know it and others don't. Those who think they don't are the biggest idiots of all.

Translation: you cannot argue facts or numbers so can only lean on saying everyone has a bias, asking their education, saying they need to see the big picture, etc.

I don't think I've seen one concrete argument come out of your mouth, and to me it indicates you are phony.

I'm not going to repeat everything I say in other threads. I can't help if you can't read. And besides, you mistake me for someone who gives a shit what you think.

I actually have respect for pingy when we disagree. You, not so much.

 

[SteadyMercury]

LOL, no nitwit, I'm used to doing algorithms that stretch from one side of the board to the other but I didn't want to intimidate the linear thinkers like you so I tried to keep it simple enough for even you to understand.

I doubt it, I smell a phony. You spend far too much effort trying to prop yourself up (like above post) instead of actually engaging what others say.

All I've seen from you is you believing junior high algebra is complex math. And trust me nothing you've done on any board with equations is too complex for me to understand, Ms. Phony.

I can always count on you to infer the wrong thing from my very big picture points. That's why I have to talk in your baby speak.

Clearly you talk with only one purpose: to avoid having to actually prove anything you say or disprove anything anyone else says.

Still waiting on you answering Pinqy, and yes we all know you can't and won't.