Unearthed video: Did Obama and Eric Holder get paid to rig court cases?

[excalibur]

Obama and his wangman... errrr.... wingman.

We know that Clinton undercut America in permitting rocket, telemetry, and similar tech to the CCP.

We know Biden and his family made millions from the CCP.

Seeing a pattern?

There’s a new video making the rounds, and it’s raising a massive red flag and asking: Did Obama and Eric Holder get paid to rig court cases? That’s the question many are now asking, and the allegations are so serious that Pam Bondi and Kash Patel should take a closer look once they get their offices setup.

The video was posted by an account “Against the Giants,” and it exposes a shocking timeline that suggests Big Tech, the Obama regime, and his DOJ may have colluded to rig our nation’s courts.

The building blocks of the left’s lawfare?

This disturbing story centers around a small, relatively unknown innovator who developed some cutting-edge wireless technology—and then had it allegedly stolen by Qualcomm.

When he sued for patent infringement, the court ruled in his favor.

But here’s where things get deeply disturbing and very interesting…

In shocking twist, that decision was mysteriously overturned right after Eric Holder’s DOJ was caught tracking the case. Suspicious? Yes. But there’s more…

The White House Executive Office was apparently busted visiting the inventor’s website, specifically looking at information related to the lawsuit against Qualcomm.

This has many people asking some very serious questions: Did the company Qualcomm grease the wheels inside the Obama regime to protect their billion-dollar empire?



...​

Unearthed video: Did Obama and Eric Holder get paid to rig court cases? - Revolver News

Sadly, this would make sense, right?

revolver.news

 

[konradv]

Obama and his wangman... errrr.... wingman.

We know that Clinton undercut America in permitting rocket, telemetry, and similar tech to the CCP.

We know Biden and his family made millions from the CCP.

Seeing a pattern?

​

There’s a new video making the rounds, and it’s raising a massive red flag and asking: Did Obama and Eric Holder get paid to rig court cases? That’s the question many are now asking, and the allegations are so serious that Pam Bondi and Kash Patel should take a closer look once they get their offices setup.​

​

The video was posted by an account “Against the Giants,” and it exposes a shocking timeline that suggests Big Tech, the Obama regime, and his DOJ may have colluded to rig our nation’s courts.​

​

The building blocks of the left’s lawfare?​

​

This disturbing story centers around a small, relatively unknown innovator who developed some cutting-edge wireless technology—and then had it allegedly stolen by Qualcomm.​

​

When he sued for patent infringement, the court ruled in his favor.​

​

But here’s where things get deeply disturbing and very interesting…​

​

In shocking twist, that decision was mysteriously overturned right after Eric Holder’s DOJ was caught tracking the case. Suspicious? Yes. But there’s more…​

​

The White House Executive Office was apparently busted visiting the inventor’s website, specifically looking at information related to the lawsuit against Qualcomm.​

​

This has many people asking some very serious questions: Did the company Qualcomm grease the wheels inside the Obama regime to protect their billion-dollar empire?​

​

​

​

...​

Unearthed video: Did Obama and Eric Holder get paid to rig court cases? - Revolver News

Sadly, this would make sense, right?

revolver.news

Distraction designed to deflect attention from The Biggest Rigger, Donald Trump. He rigged SCOTUS in an attempt to turn the US into a fascist state.

 

[crossbody]

Scheme? Conspiracy? Smoking gun?

This is a good one, thanks for posting it. I always figured the law fare behind the democrats rigging the courts against Trump was done at the root in connection to a ring of "black sisterhood quid pro quo" of campaigns funded by Soros dirty money. They acted as the mafia going out to get the payload (favors) on the back end. It was a weaponization of lawyers from the top down. Starting with Michelle Obama and Kamala Harris. Followed by those two reaching out to Fanni Willis and Letitia Brown. Add in the short fat black lawyer Alvin Bragg as a winning hand; short of winning the game.

When things appeared to be moving too slow due to a clog in Fanni Willis' toilet; they quickly brought in what they hoped to be an ace in Jack Smith, but turned out to be the joker.

Now we see why this was so easy for those females to do such wickedness as it was already done by Obama and Holder against the rightful owner of that patent in favor of Qualcomm. The House of cards; where they deal from the bottom.