Understanding "Replacement Theory"....It's A Fact

[DigitalDrifter]

“Democrat” and “news” media darling Stacy Abrams explicitly claimed that the path to Democrat victories is via “voters of color”, pointing out that the percentage of the “white” vote in Georgia decreased from almost 80% in 2002 to about 60% in 2018 as the percentage of “voters of color” increased from about 25% in 2002 to about 40% in 2018. Abrams has also described “undocumented” (illegal) immigrants as part of the “blue wave” that would sweep her to victory in November 2018. Since a “blue wave” refers to a surge in Democrat voters, this is an invitation for illegal aliens to vote in elections and an admission that she expects illegals to vote her into office.

Further, Jennifer Rubin, who used to pretend to be a Republican but now finds it more profitable to pretend to be a Democrat, explained in Aug. 2021, that “Census data shows [that the] … number of White people falls. … This is fabulous news.” In Nov, 2020, Rubin, one recalls, displayed her bitter and “vengeful” grasp on reality, and on herself, when she expressed her wish that the Republican Party would “burn down” with “no survivors.”

The Latest Hoax By Democrats And Their Media... Great Replacement Theory

Democrats claim that they are not using mass immigration to shift the demographics of America while simultaneously doing exactly that.

thebluestateconservative.com

The real point: does America benefit in any way with a policy of either inviting in people based on their race.......or replacing people based on their race?

Or, does sane immigration policy based on skills, work ethic, and integrity benefit the nation?

Only Democrats endorse the former.

This is why it's fascinating to read Dimocrat posters here now claim they don't want to see the right go away or anything happen to us, when all we've heard for years here is how much they hate us, white supremacy, and how they'd love to see us gone.
Now that someone has put a name tag to it, 'replacement theory', suddenly they are giving us this "who me?" BS.
We all know they see this opportunity of flooding our borders as an opportunity to permanently end the white majority.

 

[kyzr]

Here's some fairly current stuff on republicans. You're fairly unimportant when it comes to national out put which is why the blue states have to subsidize red states. You'd be yesterdays news if not for this antiquated electoral college and the jerrymandering you guys do. Then there's this trump shithead who says the election was stolen from him with out any explanation of how it was stolen and like the obedient and gullible trumbots you are, you believe him and wait for your marching orders. You're nothing but damn fools.

Lots of tripe but no proof to backup your claims.
November is coming, so in your fantasy world democrats will keep the House and Senate, right?
2024 is coming, so who will be president if not Trump? Kamala? Hillary? Buttplug?

Keep drinking that democrat KoolAde.

I could explain how the "open borders" and millions of migrants are hurting you, but you wouldn't believe me.
So keep believing those democrat lies...

 

[Mac1958]

Your party lost and then tried to illegally keep trump in office. Today's republicans are scum. I'm referring to the republican politicians, not the poor bamboozled voters who don't realize the republicans have nothing to offer but hate and lies.

This really has been another fascinating study. They scream about being replaced, for years. They chant it in the streets. It's the driving force of the results of the 2016 presidential election. It's just a given.

Then, when it's connected to something terrible, some of them (such as Tucker, who constantly fanned these particular flames) pretend not to know what the hell anyone is talking about. Huh? What? Replacement what? Others come right out and defend the theory. So we've gotten this weird mix of behaviors in response. And virtually all of them, as always, are then quickly turned into personal attacks to change the subject.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Rules and Laws only apply to Republicans.
Democrats can do whatever they want, and no one will prosecute them.
The MSM is all propaganda all the time.
The deep state persecutes Republicans, and covers up for democrats.
Democracy needs truth and fairness, democrats are destroying democracy.

And punishment only directed at Republicans, the Right.

"...arrested so far and charged...." by a corrupt and Democrat-linked law agency.
.....they only target Republicans for punishments....
General Flynn

Roger Stone

Scooter Libby

Papadopolous, Page, .......Trump

Dinesh D'souza.....

Any charges or investigations of Julie Swetnick ???? Blasey Ford????Kevin Clinesmith?????


How about this:
Clapper lied when asked, under oath, by Senator Ron Wyden (Oregon-Democrat) " On March 12, at a hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Wyden asked Clapper: “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” Clapper responded: “No, sir.” When Wyden followed up by asking, “It does not?” Clapper said: “Not wittingly. There are cases where they could, inadvertently perhaps, collect—but not wittingly.” Clapper did not specify at the time that he was referring to e-mail." James Clapper's Tip for Avoiding Lies: Don't Do Talking Points | emptywheel

 

[PoliticalChic]

Although not current, here's what's happening with

Here's some fairly current stuff on republicans. You're fairly unimportant when it comes to national out put which is why the blue states have to subsidize red states. You'd be yesterdays news if not for this antiquated electoral college and the jerrymandering you guys do. Then there's this trump shithead who says the election was stolen from him with out any explanation of how it was stolen and like the obedient and gullible trumbots you are, you believe him and wait for your marching orders. You're nothing but damn fools.

‘Democrat-run cities’ fuel the economy, keep many red states afloat

Even a cursory analysis of crime in America roundly debunks Trump and his allies’ claims that Democratic policies fuel violence.

thehill.com

Point of clarity: the Democrat media altered the 'color' of states for an obvious reason:

Peripheral to your point, but may I vent on this point.....the 'color of states' thing is like fingernails on a blackboard to me.

We are blue, they are red.



Red is traditionally associated with socialism and communism. The oldest symbol of socialism (and, by extension, communism) is the Red Flag, which dates back to the revolutions of 1848. The colour red was chosen to represent the blood of the workers who died in the struggle against capitalism. All major socialist and communist alliances and organisations – including the First, Second, and Third Internationals – used red as their official colour. The association between the colour red and communism is particularly strong. Communists use red much more often and more extensively than other ideologies use their respective traditional colours.







In the United States, since the year 2000, the mass media have associated red with the Republican Party, despite the fact that the Republican Party is a conservative-leaning party. Since at least 2010, the party has adopted an all red logo.

Political colour - Wikipedia





"The choice of colors in this divide is counter-intuitive to many international observers, as throughout the world, red is commonly the designated color for parties representing labor, socialist, and/or liberal interests [5] [6], which in the United States would be more closely correlated with the Democratic Party. Similarly, blue is used in these countries to depict conservative parties which in the case of the United States would be a color more suitable for the Republicans. For example, in Canada party colors are deeply ingrained and historic and have been unchanged during the Twentieth Century. Red states and blue states - Wikipedia







The Democrats should be Gray….reminiscent of the outfits they wore when they were the Confederacy, and we’re Blue….the color we wore when we pried their slaves away from them.

Justice will not be on the upswing until the true color scheme is put back in place.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I for one do not believe anyone is inferior, I simply want to preserve what is left of the culture that we have here, and not just become another Hispanic country which is all you will find south of our border. If that's what you can't wait to see happen here, you're free to go anywhere south.

That ship has sailed.



. While the reason that Democrats love immigration....legal or otherwise, is that they desire the votes.....there is a corollary to the immigration tale.
Unrestrained immigration is deleterious to the American culture.



Many....or most.....of the cultures that Democrats entice into flooding these shores are corrupt, and based on illegality. In other words, the more third world immigration, the less principled our society will be.

As a result of the Democrat Immigration act of 1965, the nations that contribute the greatest number of immigrants are not the same ones responsible for the founding of the nation. Case in point, we take more immigrants from Nigeria than we do from Britain. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Lawful_Permanent_Residents_2013.pdf




Why is this an example of a change in society for the worse? Nigeria is a criminal society, from internet scams, car-theft, piracy and kidnapping. There are more Nigerians in American than there are in any other country in the world...except Nigeria.


".... the so-called Nigerian 419 scam, named after the fraud section of the Nigerian penal code, never turns out that way.... The 419 scam reached such epidemic proportions in recent years that Congress proposed legislation, the State Department issued travel warnings and the Secret Service launched "Operation 419" to fight a scourge that has cost Americans at minimum $100 Daniel J. Smith, associate professor and chair of anthropology at Brown University, spent years in Nigeria observing the 419 scam up close, insights he shares in his book, "A Culture of Corruption: Everyday Deception and Popular Discontent in Nigeria." million."www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/qa-daniel-j-smith-honest-nigerian-corruption-419-1278.php



a. "The Nigerian mafia is well organized and sophisticated. Investigators have uncovered 'classes' where earlier Nigerian settlers train newcomers to the U.S. in the subtle arts of credit card, banking and insurance fraud and keep up to date on new techniques. " The Social Contract - The Nigerian Crime Network


b. And, of course, .... "In Mexico, every transaction between a citizen and a government official involves a cash bribe." Coulter, Op.Cit.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This is why it's fascinating to read Dimocrat posters here now claim they don't want to see the right go away or anything happen to us, when all we've heard for years here is how much they hate us, white supremacy, and how they'd love to see us gone.
Now that someone has put a name tag to it, 'replacement theory', suddenly they are giving us this "who me?" BS.
We all know they see this opportunity of flooding our borders as an opportunity to permanently end the white majority.

The plan was instituted a half century ago.


. From 1924 to 1965 we actually had a closed border, with near zero immigration.....to allow for assimilation.

In 1965 Democrats passed the Hart-Cellers Act that altered the sort of immigrants into those who needed welfare....Democrat voters.

Under Obama they enticed illegals in.....and he told them to go and vote.





Democrats were all for the Hart Cellers Act.....lying all the while.


" Despite [Democrat] Robert Kennedy's promise that, "Immigration from any single country would be limited to 10 percent of the total," Mexico sent 20 percent of last year's immigrants. Hispanics have made up nearly half of all immigrants since 1968.

[Democrat] Ted Kennedy also claimed the 1965 amendments "will not cause American workers to lose their jobs." Teddy cannot have it both ways: either the immigrant will remain unemployed and become a public charge, or he will take a job that otherwise could have gone to a native American. ....immigrant participation lowers wages.



... the [Democrat] 1965 Immigration Reform Act has remade society into the image its critics most feared. Immigration levels topping a million a year will increase U.S. population to 400 million within 50 years. Meanwhile, exponents of multiculturalism insist new arrivals make no effort to assimilate; to do so would be "genocidal," a notion that makes a mockery of real genocides. Instead, long-forgotten grudges are nursed against the white populace.

All the while, indigenous paychecks drop through lower wages and higher taxes collected to provide social services for immigrants. And this only takes into account legal immigration. "
FrontPage Magazine - The 1965 Immigration Act: Anatomy of a Disaster






Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Bin Mohamad said in a speech in 1997: "We do have the ultimate weapon. People are more mobile now. They can go anywhere. . . . If we are not allowed a good life in our countries, if we are going to be global citizens, then we should migrate North. We should migrate North in our millions, legally or illegally. Masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America."
Half a Century of Barely Controlled Immigration

How would he vote, Democrat or Republican?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

The plan was instituted a half century ago.


. From 1924 to 1965 we actually had a closed border, with near zero immigration.....to allow for assimilation.

In 1965 Democrats passed the Hart-Cellers Act that altered the sort of immigrants into those who needed welfare....Democrat voters.

Under Obama they enticed illegals in.....and he told them to go and vote.





Democrats were all for the Hart Cellers Act.....lying all the while.


" Despite [Democrat] Robert Kennedy's promise that, "Immigration from any single country would be limited to 10 percent of the total," Mexico sent 20 percent of last year's immigrants. Hispanics have made up nearly half of all immigrants since 1968.

[Democrat] Ted Kennedy also claimed the 1965 amendments "will not cause American workers to lose their jobs." Teddy cannot have it both ways: either the immigrant will remain unemployed and become a public charge, or he will take a job that otherwise could have gone to a native American. ....immigrant participation lowers wages.



... the [Democrat] 1965 Immigration Reform Act has remade society into the image its critics most feared. Immigration levels topping a million a year will increase U.S. population to 400 million within 50 years. Meanwhile, exponents of multiculturalism insist new arrivals make no effort to assimilate; to do so would be "genocidal," a notion that makes a mockery of real genocides. Instead, long-forgotten grudges are nursed against the white populace.

All the while, indigenous paychecks drop through lower wages and higher taxes collected to provide social services for immigrants. And this only takes into account legal immigration. "
FrontPage Magazine - The 1965 Immigration Act: Anatomy of a Disaster






Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Bin Mohamad said in a speech in 1997: "We do have the ultimate weapon. People are more mobile now. They can go anywhere. . . . If we are not allowed a good life in our countries, if we are going to be global citizens, then we should migrate North. We should migrate North in our millions, legally or illegally. Masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America."
Half a Century of Barely Controlled Immigration

How would he vote, Democrat or Republican?

Yep, for many years I've said I would love to plan a trip to both of these men's graves in order to take a dump on both of them. They planted the seeds of destruction.

 

[Curried Goats]

The plan was instituted a half century ago.


. From 1924 to 1965 we actually had a closed border, with near zero immigration.....to allow for assimilation.

In 1965 Democrats passed the Hart-Cellers Act that altered the sort of immigrants into those who needed welfare....Democrat voters.

Under Obama they enticed illegals in.....and he told them to go and vote.





Democrats were all for the Hart Cellers Act.....lying all the while.


" Despite [Democrat] Robert Kennedy's promise that, "Immigration from any single country would be limited to 10 percent of the total," Mexico sent 20 percent of last year's immigrants. Hispanics have made up nearly half of all immigrants since 1968.

[Democrat] Ted Kennedy also claimed the 1965 amendments "will not cause American workers to lose their jobs." Teddy cannot have it both ways: either the immigrant will remain unemployed and become a public charge, or he will take a job that otherwise could have gone to a native American. ....immigrant participation lowers wages.



... the [Democrat] 1965 Immigration Reform Act has remade society into the image its critics most feared. Immigration levels topping a million a year will increase U.S. population to 400 million within 50 years. Meanwhile, exponents of multiculturalism insist new arrivals make no effort to assimilate; to do so would be "genocidal," a notion that makes a mockery of real genocides. Instead, long-forgotten grudges are nursed against the white populace.

All the while, indigenous paychecks drop through lower wages and higher taxes collected to provide social services for immigrants. And this only takes into account legal immigration. "
FrontPage Magazine - The 1965 Immigration Act: Anatomy of a Disaster






Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Bin Mohamad said in a speech in 1997: "We do have the ultimate weapon. People are more mobile now. They can go anywhere. . . . If we are not allowed a good life in our countries, if we are going to be global citizens, then we should migrate North. We should migrate North in our millions, legally or illegally. Masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America."
Half a Century of Barely Controlled Immigration

How would he vote, Democrat or Republican?

They are only long forgotten grudges to racist whites. We remember and we're coming to your country to collect.

 

[22lcidw]

They are only long forgotten grudges to racist whites. We remember and we're coming to your country to collect.

Your vengeance will be a second and third world nation in many areas. You have done well. Boeing and other companies have been in equity mode for a while now. Their low earth capsule took three years longer than Elon Musks low earth capsule to dock with the space station. and it has not even had a crew yet with the current mission having a few more problems. They were given a lot more money to develop it also. Just one item out of many and it is growing as the costs rise.

 

[Curried Goats]

Your vengeance will be a second and third world nation in many areas. You have done well. Boeing and other companies have been in equity mode for a while now. Their low earth capsule took three years longer than Elon Musks low earth capsule to dock with the space station. and it has not even had a crew yet with the current mission having a few more problems. They were given a lot more money to develop it also. Just one item out of many and it is growing as the costs rise.

Do you really just come here to toss Elon Musk's salad? How embarrassing for you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They are only long forgotten grudges to racist whites. We remember and we're coming to your country to collect.

Of course not.

This is a low-life demanding that the racist history of his bullwhip and lynching party not be mentioned.....the reference is to you.


Can we agree that you are simply Democrat racist scum?

 

[Jets]

The plan was instituted a half century ago.


. From 1924 to 1965 we actually had a closed border, with near zero immigration.....to allow for assimilation.

In 1965 Democrats passed the Hart-Cellers Act that altered the sort of immigrants into those who needed welfare....Democrat voters.

Under Obama they enticed illegals in.....and he told them to go and vote.





Democrats were all for the Hart Cellers Act.....lying all the while.


" Despite [Democrat] Robert Kennedy's promise that, "Immigration from any single country would be limited to 10 percent of the total," Mexico sent 20 percent of last year's immigrants. Hispanics have made up nearly half of all immigrants since 1968.

[Democrat] Ted Kennedy also claimed the 1965 amendments "will not cause American workers to lose their jobs." Teddy cannot have it both ways: either the immigrant will remain unemployed and become a public charge, or he will take a job that otherwise could have gone to a native American. ....immigrant participation lowers wages.



... the [Democrat] 1965 Immigration Reform Act has remade society into the image its critics most feared. Immigration levels topping a million a year will increase U.S. population to 400 million within 50 years. Meanwhile, exponents of multiculturalism insist new arrivals make no effort to assimilate; to do so would be "genocidal," a notion that makes a mockery of real genocides. Instead, long-forgotten grudges are nursed against the white populace.

All the while, indigenous paychecks drop through lower wages and higher taxes collected to provide social services for immigrants. And this only takes into account legal immigration. "
FrontPage Magazine - The 1965 Immigration Act: Anatomy of a Disaster






Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Bin Mohamad said in a speech in 1997: "We do have the ultimate weapon. People are more mobile now. They can go anywhere. . . . If we are not allowed a good life in our countries, if we are going to be global citizens, then we should migrate North. We should migrate North in our millions, legally or illegally. Masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America."
Half a Century of Barely Controlled Immigration

How would he vote, Democrat or Republican?

And how many republicans also supported the Hart-Cellers Act of 1965?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The same Democratic party that is the most diverse political party in America? You sure you're not taking about the incredibly white Republican party, who's southern population and States make up the constituency that formerly left the union to persevere slavery and later fought hard to preserve segregation? They seem like the more obvious racists to me.

Republicans never left the union to preserve slavery, liar.

You racist Democrats, the party of bullwhips and lynching, were and are still, the scum that is out to destroy this nation.

 

[TemplarKormac]

And how many republicans also supported the Hart-Cellers Act of 1965?

In 1965, we had better control of our borders. We could afford to do away with quotas. Not today.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And how many republicans also supported the Hart-Cellers Act of 1965?

Do you support it?

 

[Jets]

In 1965, we had better control of our borders. We could afford to do away with quotas. Not today.

That’s fine, but the OP is strictly blaming one party when it was bipartisan legislation.

 

[TemplarKormac]

That’s fine, but the OP is strictly blaming one party when it was bipartisan legislation.

Democrats held a 2/3rds majority in the house and Senate in the 89th Congress.

She's not wrong.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That’s fine, but the OP is strictly blaming one party when it was bipartisan legislation.

Do you support it?

Simple question that seems to make you break out in a sweat.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That’s fine, but the OP is strictly blaming one party when it was bipartisan legislation.

The bill was the Hart Cellers Act.
What party was Hart?
What party was Cellers?
Do you support it?