- Thread starter
- #21
What, for example, are they reporting happening when it's not happening? The impeachment investigation is happening.
No! It is NOT! THEY ARE LYING TO YOU!
Understand the danger that poses!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What, for example, are they reporting happening when it's not happening? The impeachment investigation is happening.
If we don't know what's happening--not even a clue, how do you know the media is lying?
Let's make sure I've got this straight. Are you saying there is no impeachment investigation going on in the House of Representatives right now?What, for example, are they reporting happening when it's not happening? The impeachment investigation is happening.
No! It is NOT! THEY ARE LYING TO YOU!
Understand the danger that poses!
The House's rules do not mandate a vote for lawmakers to conduct an impeachment investigation, but a vote could give Republicans more power in the Democratic-led inquiry.If we don't know what's happening--not even a clue, how do you know the media is lying?
Discernment.
The house has to vote to have an impeachment investigation...they have not.
Having that vote would give the house minority (republicans) subpoena power...they don't have it.
The House's rules do not mandate a vote for lawmakers to conduct an impeachment investigation, but a vote could give Republicans more power in the Democratic-led inquiry.If we don't know what's happening--not even a clue, how do you know the media is lying?
Discernment.
The house has to vote to have an impeachment investigation...they have not.
Having that vote would give the house minority (republicans) subpoena power...they don't have it.
It would also force lawmakers in both parties to go on the record for or against the inquiry as headlines fly thick and fast about the Ukraine affair.
Trump Challenges House On Impeachment Vote. Pelosi: No Requirement For That
I can see why Trump, a Republican, would want a vote, if it would give the Republicans more power in the process. Seems like kind of a strange rule, actually.
The article I read said that it is not mandated in the House rules. I agree she is sidestepping to keep the Republicans' noses out of it. If anyone has that House rule handy relative to opening an impeachment investigation, it would be interesting to see which of our media sources is lying to us.Pelosi announced a Formal inquiry of Impeachment.
We are a representative republic where the people are represented in the House and States are Represented by the senate.
To Impeach on an Formal inquiry means to get rid of the people's vote.
It was done under Nixon and Clinton.
Pelosi just announced it without a floor vote.
She is right that it is not in the constitution, but it is in the house rules, she is sidestepping that rule.
What I thought was kind of strange is that a formal vote would give the Republicans more say in the proceedings. And that it wasn't a requirement.The House's rules do not mandate a vote for lawmakers to conduct an impeachment investigation, but a vote could give Republicans more power in the Democratic-led inquiry.If we don't know what's happening--not even a clue, how do you know the media is lying?
Discernment.
The house has to vote to have an impeachment investigation...they have not.
Having that vote would give the house minority (republicans) subpoena power...they don't have it.
It would also force lawmakers in both parties to go on the record for or against the inquiry as headlines fly thick and fast about the Ukraine affair
Trump Challenges House On Impeachment Vote. Pelosi: No Requirement For That
I can see why Trump, a Republican, would want a vote, if it would give the Republicans more power in the process. Seems like kind of a strange rule, actually.
It's about holding representatives accountable for their actions.
Dems in purple states may not get reelected if they vote against their constituents views.
That's why the rule is there.
What I thought was kind of strange is that a formal vote would give the Republicans more say in the proceedings. And that it wasn't a requirement.The House's rules do not mandate a vote for lawmakers to conduct an impeachment investigation, but a vote could give Republicans more power in the Democratic-led inquiry.If we don't know what's happening--not even a clue, how do you know the media is lying?
Discernment.
The house has to vote to have an impeachment investigation...they have not.
Having that vote would give the house minority (republicans) subpoena power...they don't have it.
It would also force lawmakers in both parties to go on the record for or against the inquiry as headlines fly thick and fast about the Ukraine affair
Trump Challenges House On Impeachment Vote. Pelosi: No Requirement For That
I can see why Trump, a Republican, would want a vote, if it would give the Republicans more power in the process. Seems like kind of a strange rule, actually.
It's about holding representatives accountable for their actions.
Dems in purple states may not get reelected if they vote against their constituents views.
That's why the rule is there.
We have a "news" media that blatantly lies to us! Not a lie here and there about little things...but on a minute by minute basis about things of global importance!
For example, in the last week the media has been telling us that we are moving very close to the impeachment of the president of the united states. It could happen at any time now.
The truth is we are no closer to impeachment than we were a year ago...2 years ago. There has not even been a vote to formally INVESTIGATE for impeachment, or draw up articles of impeachment...nothing!
This is dangerous folks! This is the stuff of nazi germany!
The article I read said that it is not mandated in the House rules.
Let's make sure I've got this straight. Are you saying there is no impeachment investigation going on in the House of Representatives right now?
The media will get locked up when Donald Trump—Andrew Jackson makes his move !!
The media will get locked up when Donald Trump—Andrew Jackson makes his move !!
In all honesty, many news media personalities SHOULD be locked up for criminal conspiracy!
I know they have special protections under the first amendment...but for Gods sake that can't possibly include trying to overthrow the US gov't with their lies!
It's not the House, it's Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler. Until there's a vote, it's not the House.Or are you saying you don't believe the House has a good reason to consider impeachment?
We have a "news" media that blatantly lies to us! Not a lie here and there about little things...but on a minute by minute basis about things of global importance!
For example, in the last week the media has been telling us that we are moving very close to the impeachment of the president of the united states. It could happen at any time now.
The truth is we are no closer to impeachment than we were a year ago...2 years ago. There has not even been a vote to formally INVESTIGATE for impeachment, or draw up articles of impeachment...nothing!
This is dangerous folks! This is the stuff of nazi germany!
But they misjudged people's ability to quickly forget history. So it's repeating.
This country is in a death spiral. what comes next gets ugly unfortunately.