Underage rape victims crushed by cruel anti abortion laws

The Texas sexual abuse account may well be the same issue as human trafficking. We don't know because there is never enough information to verify it. The point is that young girls are being intimidated by cross dressing boys in schools and women are being raped and killed by illegal aliens. Kids are being kidnapped by the system without parental notification and castrated and thousands of children are victims of human traffickers. States are trying to get the abortion laws right and analyzing the technical aspects is nothing but a political effort that masks what kids are going through every day.
That was world class deflecting sir.
Nothing to do with pervs raping their daughters but a great effort. At least you didnt call these teen mothers ssluts.
 
The Texas sexual abuse account may well be the same issue as human trafficking. We don't know because there is never enough information to verify it. The point is that young girls are being intimidated by cross dressing boys in schools and women are being raped and killed by illegal aliens. Kids are being kidnapped by the system without parental notification and castrated and thousands of children are victims of human traffickers. States are trying to get the abortion laws right and analyzing the technical aspects is nothing but a political effort that masks what kids are going through every day.
ALL true---but I still see them as separate issues---you are presenting an idea like---discussion of abortion is an EVASION.
Kids are being "kidnapped" by the system and castrated? A
governmental program?
 
65000 rapes! How many arrests? How many convictions? How many "my boyfriend dumped me and I feel raped".
 
You know I thought any sane adult would agree that this was wrong and that these children needed protecting.
Not in the US it would seem. They back the rapists instead.
You mean democrats back the rapists and traffickers.

Biden lost track of 100,000 kids. How many are sex slaves? Probably most of them.
 
Many dont. Children in Texas deserve the same protections as children in civilised countries.
WTF are you babbling about?
1. The USSC is behind what? (post #5)
2. Many don't what?
3. What are kids in TX not protected from what?

You make no sense. You don't even post in grammatically correct sentences.
 
First of all, the Supreme Court was absolutely correct in sending the abortion question back to the individual states. This is NOT a Federal issue under the US Constitution.

Many/Most of us in the Right ARE in favor of exceptions for certain circumstances. Most often: Rape, Incest, and the Life of the mother.

That happens to be my stance; with these caveats….

Rape: Myst be willing to name the rapist and/or assist in the investigation and prosecution of the rapist.

Incest: Unless both parties were consenting adults.

Life of the Mother: The actual LIFE of the mother must be in immediate peril. We’re not talking about the mother’s quality of life after the delivery. We’re talking imminent death.
 
First of all, the Supreme Court was absolutely correct in sending the abortion question back to the individual states. This is NOT a Federal issue under the US Constitution.

Many/Most of us in the Right ARE in favor of exceptions for certain circumstances. Most often: Rape, Incest, and the Life of the mother.

That happens to be my stance; with these caveats….

Rape: Myst be willing to name the rapist and/or assist in the investigation and prosecution of the rapist.

Incest: Unless both parties were consenting adults.

Life of the Mother: The actual LIFE of the mother must be in immediate peril. We’re not talking about the mother’s quality of life after the delivery. We’re talking imminent death.
Lol now you're a doctor? Get out of here you sick old man.
 
Lol now you're a doctor? Get out of here you sick old man.
I never claimed to be a doctor. In reference to the “Life of the Mother” option; it would have to be determined by appropriate medical personnel, as laid out in the laws of the individual state. My point was simply that the potential for post-partum depression, stretch marks, etc… do not qualify as threats to the life of the mother.
 
None of the right want to discuss the health of the teens and pre teens affected by this.
Cant you at least admit this is wrong ?
Normal America knows that it is wrong.
 
If Democrats would stop supporting people who **** kids, this would not be such an issue.
 

Some of these stories are too horrific to dwell on. But for the victims it is a life sentence.
Trump was proud of overturning Roe.
I doubt he would comment on this.

I cannt believe that all republicans back this cruelty. That cannot be possible.

Ledbetter said she had seen a 10-year old become pregnant after her mother’s boyfriend sexually assaulted her, with the mother’s knowledge. “Her little body was unable to carry the pregnancy, and she started to have a uterine rupture before the fetus was at a viable gestation.”

The complications of preterm labor and uterine rupture necessitated a C-section to save the child’s life; the fetus did not survive. “An abortion would have saved this 10-year-old child great suffering and trauma for the rest of her life,” Ledbetter said.


Amerixa needs a govt that protects children. Not a new branch of the Inquisition.
I read about this case, it’s not new. She was actually a sex slave trafficked her during harris time as border czar
 
None of the right want to discuss the health of the teens and pre teens affected by this.
Cant you at least admit this is wrong ?
Normal America knows that it is wrong.
It seems that the far right will never condemn this far right crruelty.
 
Is it even safe for a 17 year old to deliver a child? Seems very unhealthy and against rules of nature.
 
First of all, the Supreme Court was absolutely correct in sending the abortion question back to the individual states. This is NOT a Federal issue under the US Constitution.

Many/Most of us in the Right ARE in favor of exceptions for certain circumstances. Most often: Rape, Incest, and the Life of the mother.

That happens to be my stance; with these caveats….

Rape: Myst be willing to name the rapist and/or assist in the investigation and prosecution of the rapist.

Incest: Unless both parties were consenting adults.

Life of the Mother: The actual LIFE of the mother must be in immediate peril. We’re not talking about the mother’s quality of life after the delivery. We’re talking imminent death.

I never get why they include incest as a separate category, as the incest that is the concern here is always rape.
 
15th post
I never get why they include incest as a separate category, as the incest that is the concern here is always rape.
They do it because in certain states parents or even elder family members may have “rights” to “teach/train” or “punish” female family members. At least that’s how it’s been explained to me.
 
Is it even safe for a 17 year old to deliver a child? Seems very unhealthy and against rules of nature.

17 yea, totally safe. 10, not so much.

When I was in 8th grade a very very cute cheerleader in my econ class got pregnant. She was like 13 when she got pregnant, 14 and had the baby normally. She was out a month or so from school to have her baby in 9th grade.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom