Timbers company disposed of fetuses. Conde Nast is a publication that publishes stuff. I understand you are confused but one of these things is not the other. The Magazine can exist without root canals.
Conde Nast is a publication that sells both it's product and it's service. And yes, it could exist without root canals. Similarly, timbers company handled medical waste, of which trash bags filled with dead babies belonged. Along with syringes. And catheters. And iv bags, etc. no evidence has been put forth that timbers relied on the disposal of dead babies to exist. I understand that, in your zealous rage against profit and succes you are unable to rationally discuss romney's wild success. But carry on. Those that support you are laughing at you.
If Conde Nast took a stance against root canals and profitted from it, you would have a point. Also, if you are against something PUBLICLY and turn around and mistakenly profits from it...you still look like a hypocrite. Even by accident...people in the middle will see that as hypocritical.
If it was by accident, how is he going to say "I'm a smart business man but I didnt know that." He cant. I understand Pho....Let's spend time talking about how Obama is a hypocrite for taking money from a comedian that says bad words. Romney is not a hypocrite for making money from something hes very vocal about being against.
Comedian vs Bag of Fetuses...you cant even be honest and see how one is worst than the other.