Unbelievable: Obama Attends Wedding With Unrepentant Domestic Terrorist Bill Ayers

Seems North spent time in prison before being let out...did the president when breaking the laws of Congress?
"North was tried in 1988. He was indicted on 16 felony counts, and on May 4, 1989, he was initially convicted of three: accepting an illegal gratuity, aiding and abetting in the obstruction of a congressional inquiry, and ordering the destruction of documents through his secretary, Fawn Hall. He was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Gerhard A. Gesell on July 5, 1989, to a three-year suspended prison term, two years probation, $150,000 in fines, and 1,200 hours of community service. North performed some of his community service within Potomac Gardens, a public housing project in Southeast Washington, D.C.[21]

However, on July 20, 1990, with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU),[22] North’s convictions were vacated, after the appeals court found that witnesses in his trial might have been impermissibly affected by his immunized congressional testimony.[23]

Because North had been granted limited immunity for his congressional testimony, the law prohibited a prosecutor from using that testimony as part of a criminal case against him. To prepare for the expected defense challenge that North’s testimony had been used, the prosecution team had—before North’s congressional testimony had been given—listed and isolated all of its evidence.[citation needed] Further, the individual members of the prosecution team had isolated themselves from news reports and discussion of North’s testimony. While the defense could show no specific instance in which North’s congressional testimony was used in his trial, the Court of Appeals ruled that the trial judge had made an insufficient examination of the issue. Consequently, North’s convictions were reversed. After further hearings on the immunity issue, Judge Gesell dismissed all charges against North on September 16, 1991."
Oliver North - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Your kind of guy...

Using the ACLU for a positive defense...you just have to LOVE the IRONY!!!!
The ACLU, not what you think: ACLU Defense of Religious Practice and Expression in Public Schools American Civil Liberties Union

Even THEY have to get one right after awhile, like a stopped clock, correct time twice a day!
The defend people you'd support all the time. It's about rights, not left and right.

Most of the time they have a spewed view of what rights are!
 
"Ayers and Dorhn are notorious, un-indicted terrorists who were once part of the 1960s radical terror outfit the Weather Underground. The pair were involved in deadly 1970s bombings, but managed to escape prosecution. Now both are leading cushy lives as professors at the University of Illinois at Chicago."

Ayers was laughing when he talked about how he got off on a technicality. Even he admits he was not innocent, just guilty as sin and free as a bird. His only regret was not bombing more. Hell of a guy.
And Traitor North, who was convicted of multiple felonies but got off on appeal by a technicality, claims in his book that he was found "innocent" on appeal. So who is the more honest of the two, and why does the Right worship the dishonest one?
 
"Ayers and Dorhn are notorious, un-indicted terrorists who were once part of the 1960s radical terror outfit the Weather Underground. The pair were involved in deadly 1970s bombings, but managed to escape prosecution. Now both are leading cushy lives as professors at the University of Illinois at Chicago."

Ayers was laughing when he talked about how he got off on a technicality. Even he admits he was not innocent, just guilty as sin and free as a bird. His only regret was not bombing more. Hell of a guy.
And Traitor North, who was convicted of multiple felonies but got off on appeal by a technicality, claims in his book that he was found "innocent" on appeal. So who is the more honest of the two, and why does the Right worship the dishonest one?

I didn't say anything about North, but am noting your obvious attempt to derail topic. Obama is still hanging out with Ayers, who committed terrorist acts. And he is not sorry about it, meaning his views remain the same.
 
"Ayers and Dorhn are notorious, un-indicted terrorists who were once part of the 1960s radical terror outfit the Weather Underground. The pair were involved in deadly 1970s bombings, but managed to escape prosecution. Now both are leading cushy lives as professors at the University of Illinois at Chicago."

Ayers was laughing when he talked about how he got off on a technicality. Even he admits he was not innocent, just guilty as sin and free as a bird. His only regret was not bombing more. Hell of a guy.
And Traitor North, who was convicted of multiple felonies but got off on appeal by a technicality, claims in his book that he was found "innocent" on appeal. So who is the more honest of the two, and why does the Right worship the dishonest one?

I didn't say anything about North, but am noting your obvious attempt to derail topic. Obama is still hanging out with Ayers, who committed terrorist acts. And he is not sorry about it, meaning his views remain the same.
Obama did NOT invite Ayers, or anyone else to the wedding.
 
Obama is still hanging out with Ayers, who committed terrorist acts. And he is not sorry about it, meaning his views remain the same.
Logic fail.

I've been to weddings before, and it certainly didn't mean I share the same views as every other guest.
 
"Ayers and Dorhn are notorious, un-indicted terrorists who were once part of the 1960s radical terror outfit the Weather Underground. The pair were involved in deadly 1970s bombings, but managed to escape prosecution. Now both are leading cushy lives as professors at the University of Illinois at Chicago."

Ayers was laughing when he talked about how he got off on a technicality. Even he admits he was not innocent, just guilty as sin and free as a bird. His only regret was not bombing more. Hell of a guy.
And Traitor North, who was convicted of multiple felonies but got off on appeal by a technicality, claims in his book that he was found "innocent" on appeal. So who is the more honest of the two, and why does the Right worship the dishonest one?

I didn't say anything about North, but am noting your obvious attempt to derail topic. Obama is still hanging out with Ayers, who committed terrorist acts. And he is not sorry about it, meaning his views remain the same.

Obama went to the wedding of the White House chef. And?
 
The article never makes the claim he attended with Ayers as in the same car. Obama attended the wedding with a lot of people. It is just that Ayers is a unindited criminal and has known Obama for a very long time. Before the last election I doubt Obama would have attended with Ayers, now he doesn't give a crap what people think.
 
Those two are like two peas in a pod..they both hate us and our country
This isn't your country. You are neither wanted nor needed, so get out.
I agree with her 100%. Do I have to leave too? :(


Their post shows you the nasty scary followers that belongs in the Obama cult. they are just like him, bully and a thug
Now wait just a minute there Slick, you wing-nuts say he is a pansy and now you say he's a bully and a thug. Were you liars lying then or are you liars lying now?


I would say then and now.
 

Forum List

Back
Top